U2 Measuring Financial Performance Flashcards
A coach of a football team needs to know the running score of the game in order to assess whether he needs to make changes for the team to win. Additionally, the current position in the national league will likely affect the strategy employed. Managers of corporations need similar information to run the organization.
For business,
the running score are data such as profits, gains and losses, or the market share.
However, analyzing costs or other specific measures alone means little.
The context and position in relation to competitors-the ‘national league’ to draw on the football example-is equally important for the organization’s strategy.
Measuring that running and contextual score and using it for better future performance in a business environment is the subject of performance measurement.
Measuring that running and contextual score and using it for better future performance in a business environment is the subject of ———————-.
performance measurement.
The approaches and concepts behind the practical implementation of performance measurement are numerous and diverse in nature. There is no—————————-or ———————————–which will work in every context and organization.
‘one-size-fits-all’
‘standard recipe’
This means that performance measurement is often challenging and requires?
a good understanding of the organization and its core business processes.
Complicating matters further is the fact that ?
We will define it here as “regular measurement of the results or outcomes and efficiency of services or programs”. One of the critical aspects of this definition is the regular measurement of results or outcomes.
performance measurement has many different meanings.
Complicating matters further is the fact that ?
performance measurement has many different meanings.
We will define it here as ?
“regular measurement of the results or outcomes and efficiency of services or programs”.
One of the critical aspects of this definition is the regular measurement of ?
results or outcomes.
Regular measurement is necessary in order to make progress towards ?
specified outcomes and it is a vital component of any customer-oriented process.
Regular measurement is necessary in order to make progress towards ?
specified outcomes and it is a vital component of any customer-oriented process.
Data quality is another essential requirement, because?
if things are not accurate, those using the information will be misled and bad decisions will likely ensue.
The following statements, often used in the context of performance measurement, stress the importance of identifying the right metrics for a business:
=“You cannot manage what you cannot measure.
=“What gets measured gets done.”
=“Measurement influences behavior.”
It is commonly believed that early performance measurement systems have their origin in
?
accounting systems.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The more industrial organizations developed, the greater the need for?
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The more industrial organizations developed, the greater the need for?
The more industrial organizations developed, the greater the need for?
certain measures to determine their effectiveness.
Current management accounting developed in the US between?
the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from piece-work payment systems to wages, single efforts to multiple operations, individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses, and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
the 1850s and 1920s
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
Current management accounting developed in the US between?
the 1850s and 1920s
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing, variance analysis, flexible budgets, return on investment, and other key management ratios. From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The period from 1925 to the 1980s was not characterized by?
inappropriate indicators for businesses effectiveness. The main criticism was focused on the dysfunctional actions of the traditional accounting-based performance measures, especially when used inappropriately.
significant changes in the development of management accounting.
However, beginning from the 1980s, traditional accounting measures were criticized as ?
The period from 1925 to the 1980s was not characterized by?
The main criticism was focused on the dysfunctional actions of the traditional accounting-based performance measures, especially when used inappropriately.
significant changes in the development of management accounting.
However, beginning from the 1980s, traditional accounting measures were criticized as ?
inappropriate indicators for businesses effectiveness.
The period from 1925 to the 1980s was not characterized by?
significant changes in the development of management accounting.
The main criticism was focused on ?
the dysfunctional actions of the traditional accounting-based performance measures, especially when used inappropriately.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
Critics feared these criticisms had the potential to damage?
not only individual businesses,
but the entire economy.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
The main criticism was focused on ?
the dysfunctional actions of the traditional accounting-based performance measures, especially when used inappropriately.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
The main criticism was focused on ?
the dysfunctional actions of the traditional accounting-based performance measures, especially when used inappropriately.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Critics feared these criticisms had the potential to damage?
not only individual businesses,
but the entire economy.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
Considering this historical context, it is not surprising that corporate performance has traditionally been understood in——————– terms. Still today, financial information is the most widely available information source on companies. One of the main reasons for this is the requirement imposed by regulators and supervisors on companies to disclose certain financial information.
financial
Considering this historical context, it is not surprising that corporate performance has traditionally been understood in——————– terms. Still today, financial information is the most widely ———— information source on companies. One of the main reasons for this is the —————————————————————————————— on companies to disclose certain financial information.
financial
available
requirement imposed by regulators and supervisors
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
Performance measures focusing on financial aspects can be divided into two main types:
=Measures based on accounting data
=Market-based measures derived from stock or other financial market values
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Accounting-Based Performance Measures
Traditional accounting-based performance measures are characterized as being?
financially-based,
internally-focused,
retrospective,
and more concerned with local departmental performance rather than with the overall performance of the business.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The validity of these measures has been extensively ——————— and the main focus has been on ————–measures.
neoclassical economists and classical management, which ultimately sees the legitimate objective of any private organization as maximizing profits.
examined
profitability
The search for and interest in profitability measures is in line with ?
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
The validity of these measures has been extensively ——————— and the main focus has been on ————–measures.
examined
profitability
The search for and interest in profitability measures is in line with ?
neoclassical economists and classical management, which ultimately sees the legitimate objective of any private organization as maximizing profits.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
The financial statement is a public document which is targeted at the main user groups which include:
investors
shareholders
employees
lender
ssuppliers
customers
government
the public
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
From a high-level perspective such performance comparisons and analysis may include:
=Comparison of current year’s results with the previous year to identify trends and performance drivers within the organization
=The current year’s results in comparison with the results of companies in the same line of business, in order to establish whether the organization is performing better or worse than its competitors
=Current performance against a standard or benchmark of performance
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The various user groups have different interests in the business and consequently apply a series of accounting ratios to interpret and appraise financial performance based on?
their information needs.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The various user groups have different interests in the business and consequently apply a series of accounting ratios to interpret and appraise financial performance based on?
their information needs.
From a high-level perspective such performance comparisons and analysis may include:
=Comparison of current year’s results with the previous year to identify trends and performance drivers within the organization
=The current year’s results in comparison with the results of companies in the same line of business, in order to establish whether the organization is performing better or worse than its competitors
=Current performance against a standard or benchmark of performance
=Comparisons of one segment or division of a business with others, so as to establish which parts of the business are achieving their goals
Financial performance indicators included in the financial statement can be presented in the form of?
ratios and cover a number of concepts.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Financial performance indicators included in the financial statement can be presented in the form of?
ratios and cover a number of concepts.
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with?
basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios.
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be ?
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with?
basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be ?
the objective that these figures are supposed to accomplish, which highly depends on the context.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
For example, organizations which provide credit to their customers have a need to?
control their debtors through debtors’ balances, presented on a monthly basis.
Those who have a significant investment in stock should implement controls through perpetual inventory records.
Regular debtor and inventory reports will help prevent too much capital being tied up in these areas and allow for prompt follow up action.
Such actions can include changing inventory ordering patterns and allowing for immediate follow-up on debtors to prevent ‘bad’ debts.
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be ?
the objective that these figures are supposed to accomplish, which highly depends on the context.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
For example, organizations which provide credit to their customers have a need to control their debtors through?
debtors’ balances, presented on a monthly basis.
Those who have a significant investment in stock should implement controls through perpetual inventory records.
Regular debtor and inventory reports will help prevent too much capital being tied up in these areas and allow for prompt follow up action.
Such actions can include changing inventory ordering patterns and allowing for immediate follow-up on debtors to prevent ‘bad’ debts.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
Although the use of specific accounting-based performance figures depends very much on the objective and specific context, some performance measures have gained prominence and are frequently used.
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be?
the objective that these figures are supposed to accomplish, which highly depends on the context.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
Although the use of specific accounting-based performance figures depends very much on the objective and specific context, some performance measures have gained prominence and are frequently used.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
For example, organizations which provide credit to their customers have a need to control their debtors through?
debtors’ balances, presented on a monthly basis.
Those who have a significant investment in stock should implement controls through perpetual inventory records.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be?
the objective that these figures are supposed to accomplish, which highly depends on the context.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Within each of these groups, there are numerous ratios which can be built and applied with basically no limit to the creativity of ‘inventing’ new ratios. However, a guiding principle of building and analyzing performance ratios should be?
the objective that these figures are supposed to accomplish, which highly depends on the context.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
For example, organizations which provide credit to their customers have a need to control their debtors through?
debtors’ balances, presented on a monthly basis.
Those who have a significant investment in stock should implement controls through perpetual inventory records.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
Regular debtor and inventory reports will help prevent too much capital being tied up in these areas and allow for prompt follow up action.
Such actions can include changing inventory ordering patterns and allowing for immediate follow-up on debtors to prevent ‘bad’ debts.
Although the use of specific accounting-based performance figures depends very much on the objective and specific context, some performance measures have gained prominence and are frequently used.
Although the use of specific accounting-based performance figures depends very much on?
the objective and specific context, some performance measures have gained prominence and are frequently used.
Return on equity (ROE):
Calculates the earnings over a shareholder’s equity.
It measures a corporation’s profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested.
image
performance measures
=Return on equity (ROE):
=Return on assets (ROA):
=Return on investment (ROI):
=Earning per share (EPS):
=Dividend payout-ratio:
=Cash flow:
=Stock turnover-days:
=Receivables turnover ratio:
=Receivables turnover ratio:
=Debt\/equity ratio:
=Interest coverage ratio:
=Gross profit margin:
=Breakeven sales:
=Price-to-book ratio (P\/B ratio):
=Price-to-earnings ratio (P\/E ratio):
=Dividend yield:
=Net present value (NPV):
=Internal rate of return (IRR):
Return on assets (ROA):
This is an indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. ROA gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. This ratio is calculated by dividing a company’s annual earnings by its total assets.
image
Return on investment (ROI):
Represents the after-tax return which owners are receiving on their investment and should be compared with alternative forms of investment.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
Return on investment (ROI):
Represents the after-tax return which owners are receiving on their investment and should be compared with alternative forms of investment.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
image
Earning per share (EPS):
The portion of a company’s profit allocated to weighted outstanding shares. EPS serves as an indicator of a company’s profitability.
image
Dividend payout-ratio:
Calculates the percentage of earnings paid to shareholders in dividends in a specific period. A stable dividend payout ratio indicates a solid dividend policy by the company’s board of directors.
image
Cash flow:
There are different definitions for cash flows and different types of cash flows (e.g. free cash flow, operational cash flows, etc.). For practical purposes earnings plus depreciations can be used as a simple approximation.
In this unit we will review some of the traditional models of performance measurement with a focus on financial key figures before we draw our attention to some of the more recent approaches to performance measurement.
Reviewing Traditional Models of Financial Performance Measurement
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
After World War I, companies such as du Pont, Sears Roebuck, and General Motors started to use sophisticated budgeting and management accounting techniques, such as?
standard costing,
variance analysis,
flexible budgets,
return on investment,
and other key management ratios.
From these beginnings, the use of budgets spread widely.
image
Cash flow:
There are different definitions for cash flows and different types of cash flows (e.g. free cash flow, operational cash flows, etc.). For practical purposes earnings plus depreciations can be used as a simple approximation.
The minimum accounting-based financial information for any business is compiled in the form of ?
periodic financial statements which consist of (at least) a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement.
image
Although the use of specific accounting-based performance figures depends very much on the objective and specific context, some performance measures have gained prominence and are frequently used.
Current management accounting developed in the US between the 1850s and 1920s when industrial organizations moved from ?
piece-work payment systems to wages,
single efforts to multiple operations,
individual production plants to vertical integrated businesses,
and individual businesses to multi-divisional organizations.
They were also criticized for ?
encouraging short-term decision-making as well as for their inapplicability to modern manufacturing techniques.
These concepts can be grouped as follows:
profitability
liquidity
utilization
financial structur
einvestment–shareholder ratios
Return on equity (ROE):
Calculates the earnings over a shareholder’s equity.
It measures a corporation’s profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested.
The extent to which financial information must be disclosed is dependent upon?
the public or private character of the company, its size, and whether the company is listed on a stock exchange or not.
Return on investment (ROI):
Represents the after-tax return which owners are receiving on their investment and should be compared with alternative forms of investment.