U1- Electoral Systems Flashcards

1
Q

Describe First Past the Post (FPTP)

A

It is the electoral system used in the U.K. General elections. It is a simple majority system whereby in each of the UK’s 650 constituencies the candidate with the most votes wins the seat and becomes the MP in that constituency.

Each voter casts a single vote and each constituency elects a single MP

The party with the most MPs forms the new government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give 6 advantages of FPTP

A

Easy to use from a voters perspective

Usually creates a strong majority government- they can deliver their manifesto

The UK has worked well with this system for hundreds of years

It’s cheap and quick to have an election

There is a strong MP to constituency link

There is a basic fairness in that the party with the most votes forms the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give 6 disadvantages to FPTP

A

It is not remotely proportional! Approximately 40% of votes will give 60% of the seats

Parties who finish second get nothing

It creates a north south divide which threatens the union

There are many wasted votes

Your chosen candidate/ party may never win, depending on where you live

It is unfair to smaller parties and favours larger parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does FPTP impact Scotland?

A

Millions of labour voters are unrepresented

The UK is run by a party which is deeply unpopular in Scotland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did FPTP impact UKIP in 2015?

A

UKIP got 3.5 million votes and 1 seat

SNP got 1.5 million votes and 56 seats!

This shows that having a concentration of voters is crucial to success- UKIPs votes were too widespread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a major criticism of the FPTP system?

A

It creates a situation where many MPs and the winning party which go on to form the government, do not receive the support of the majority of the electorate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the additional member system?

A

It is a mixed system which combines FPTP and proportional representation (PR)

In Scotland, voters cast 2 votes

The first vote is to elect the 73 constituency MPs

The second vote uses the party list system of PR.
In this vote the electorate chooses between parties who will represent them in their region.

There are 8 regions and each elects 7 MSPs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give 5 advantages of AMS

A

The result is more proportional than FPTP as there are 2 ballot papers

It keeps a strong constituency link- one MSP will live in your area

Voters have a greater choice- mix and match

Smaller parties can benefit e.g. Greens

Usually creates coalitions which lead to compromise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give 4 disadvantages of AMS

A

AMS is more complicated for voters to understand as it features 2 votes

Often creates coalition governments, they are not democratic as no one votes for a coalition!

Can often be the case that smaller parties achieve too much power

The regional MSPs are not directly voted for by the people as the people vote for a party and the party then chooses who will become an MSP. Very few people can hold them accountable as they do not know who they are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Single Transferable Vote? (STV)

A

It is a preferential voting system in multi member constituencies

Voters rank the candidates in order of preference and can vote for as few or as many as they like

A quota system is then used to calculate the minimum number of votes required to win a seat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give 4 arguments for STV

A

It is more proportional as candidates must reach a certain ‘quota’ of votes to be elected, with all votes counting and impacting the result

STV is fairer to smaller parties and gives them a better chance of gaining seats. STV allows small parties to gain a percentage of votes that matches the percentage of seats they have gained

There are usually fewer wasted votes. As candidates must reach a certain quota every vote must be counted

STV allows more choice for the electorate as they can vote for as many or as few candidates as they like

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give 4 arguments against STV

A

It is thought to be more confusing than many other electoral systems. People are asked to cast their vote more than once on the same ballot paper

Can often produce results to which no one agreed. It produces a result which means many local authorises have a party with no overall control

Can allow more power to fall into the hands of smaller parties. It allows parties which have little support to be involved in coalition agreements

The results take longer than other systems. The votes must be counted and recounted until a winner can be declared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does Party List PR work?

A

Parties present lists of candidates and seats are awarded according to their party’s share of the vote.

This is usually done using an electoral formula or quota which prevents too many small parties from winning seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where is Party List PR used?

A

British elections to the European Parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Arguments for PL (Give 5)

A

Party List systems ensure a high degree of Party proportionality

Every vote has equal value

Simple to understand- voters have to make one choice out of a small selection

Open lists over voters more choice and control over who is elected

Traditional creates coalition governments and this results in a broader range of parties being represented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Arguments against PL (Give 3)

A

Lists are completely impersonal, weakening any link between the representative and a regional area

All the power of selection resides with the party leaders as voters have no choice over the candidate elected

It can lead to under representation as party leaders may chose people similar to them to stand, rather than candidates from under represented groups such as woman and ethnic minorities