types of attachment - ainsworth's 'strange situation' Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

who developed it & when

A

mary ainsworth & silvia bell (1970)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aim

A

be able to observe key attachment behaviours as a means of assessing the quality of a baby’s attachment to a caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe the ‘strange situation’

A
  • controlled observation designed to test attachment security in babies
  • they are assessed on their response to playing in an unfamiliar room, being left alone, left with stranger & reunited with caregiver
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how did the researchers observe the behaviour

A

via a two-way mirror and/or cameras

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

name the 5 behaviours used to judge the attachment

A
  1. proximity seeking
  2. exploration & secure-base behaviour
  3. stranger anxiety
  4. separation anxiety
  5. response to reunion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define proximity seeking

A

baby with good quality attachment will stay fairly close to caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define exploration & secure-base behaviour

A

good attachment enables a baby to feel confident to explore, using caregiver as secure base
eg. a point of contact will make them feel safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define stranger anxiety

A

one of signs of becoming closely attached is displaying anxiety when a stranger approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define separation anxiety

A

another sign of becoming attached is to protest at separation from caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define response to reunion

A

babies who are securely attached greet caregiver’s return with pleasure & seek comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how many episodes were in the procedure

A

7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how long did each episode last

A

3 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe each episode & what it was testing

A

caregiver & baby enter unfamiliar playroom
1. baby is encouraged to explore = exploration & secure base
2. stranger comes in, talks to caregiver & approaches the baby = stranger anxiety
3. caregiver leaves baby & stranger together = separation & stranger anxiety
4. caregiver returns & stranger leaves = reunion behaviour & exploration/secure-base
5. caregiver leaves baby alone = separation anxiety
6. stranger returns = stranger anxiety
7. caregiver returns & is reunited with baby = reunion behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

who identified 3 main types of attachment & when

A

ainsworth et. al (1978)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

name the 3 main types of attachment

A

type A: insecure-avoidant attachment
type B: secure attachment
type C: insecure-resistant attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe type A: insecure-avoidant attachment

A
  • babies explore freely & don’t seek proximity/show secure-base behaviour
  • show little/no reaction when caregiver leaves & little stranger anxiety
  • make little effort to make contact when caregiver returns & may even avoid it
17
Q

describe type B: secure attachment

A
  • babies explore happily but regularly go back to caregiver (proximity-seeking & secure-base behaviour)
  • usually show moderate separation distress & stranger anxiety
  • require & accept comfort from caregiver in reunion stage
18
Q

describe type C: insecure-resistant attachment

A
  • seek greater proximity than others = explore less
  • high levels of stranger & separation anxiety
  • resist comfort when reunited with caregiver
19
Q

what percentage of (british) babies are classified as insecure-avoidant attachment

A

20-25%

20
Q

what percentage of (british) babies are classified as secure attachment

A

60-75%

21
Q

what percentage of (british) babies are classified as insecure-resistant attachment

A

3%

22
Q

evaluate ainsworth’s strange situation AO3

A

+)
P: good predictive validity - outcome predicts number of aspects of babies later development
E: lots of research has shown that that babies/toddlers assessed as secure (type b) tend to have better outcome than others, both in later childhood & adulthood. in childhood, this includes higher academic success & less involvment with bullying ( mcCormick et al. 2016, kokkinos 2007). securely attached babies also have better mental health in adulthood (ward et al. 2006). those assessed as being insecure-resistant & those not falling into type a/b/c tend to have worst outcomes
T: suggests strange situation measures something real & meaningful in babies development
COUNTERPOINT
-)
P: measures something more important that’s associated with later development but some psychologists believe this isn’t attachment
E: eg. kagan (1982) suggested that genetically-influenced anxiety levels could account for variations in attachment behaviour in strange situation & later development
T: strange situation may not accurately measure attachment

+)
P: good inter-rater reliability
E: johanna bick et. al (2012) testes inter-rater reliability for the strange situation for a team of trained observers & the agreement on attachment type was in 94% of cases. this high level of reliability may be due to the controlled conditions in which the procedure takes place & because behaviours (eg. proximity seeking) involve large movements and thus, are easy to observe. for instance, anxious babies cry/crawl away from strangers
T: we can be confident that the attachment type assessed by the strange situation doesn’t rely/depend on subjective judgements

-)
P: may not be valid measure of attachment in different cultural contexts (culture-bound)
E: the strange situation was developed in britian/the US and thus, may be culture-bound. one reason for this is babies may have different experiences in different cultures which may affect their responses to the strange situation. for example, takahashi (1986) conducted a study within japan where the babies displayed very high levels of separation anxiety & so a disproportionate number were categorised as insecure-resistant. takahashi (1990) suggests that the anxiety response wasn’t due to high rates of attachment insecurity but the unusual nature of the babies experiences in japan where mother-baby separation is very rare
T: means it’s difficult to know whether the strange situation is measuring what it intends to outside of europe & the US

+)
P: practical application
E: used in court proceedings when a mother/father wants to have contact with their child. if the child is found to have a secure attachment with their non-custodial parent, then it would be in the best interest of the child to establish regular direct contact
T: strange situation can be used to help children develop their relationships with both caregivers, if appropriate

-)
P: ethical issues
E: child is put under stress (separation/stranger anxiety) meaning the study has broken the ethical guideline of protection from harm/of participants. however, the separation episodes were curtailed prematurely if the child became too stressed
T: it still broke the ethical guideline