influence of early attachment on later relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

who suggested that a baby’s first relationship with their primary attachment figure leads to a mental representation of this relationship

A

bowlby (1969)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does the internal working model act as

A

template for future childhood & adult relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what leads to an individual having fulfilling & functional relationships

A

the quality of a babies first attachment must be of a loving relationship with a reliable attachment figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who created the ‘love quiz’

A

hazan & shaver 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

aim of hazar & shaver 1987

A

to investigate if there was a correlation between an infant’s early attachment type & their future approach to romantic relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

procedure of hazar & shaver 1987

A
  • developed love quiz consisting of 2 components:
    1. measure of attachment type = simple adjective checklist of childhood relationships w/ parents & parents’ relationship
    2. love experience questionnaire = assessed individual beliefs on romantic love eg. if lasted forever
  • printed in local newspaper (‘rocky mountain news’) & readers sent responses
  • analysed first 620 replies from people aged 14-82
  • classified respondents accorded to mary ainsworth’s attachment types & looked for corresponding adult love styles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

findings for securely attached (type B) of hazar & shaver 1987

A
  • love experiences described as happy, friendly & trusting
  • accept partner regardless of faults
  • more enduring relationships
  • initial passion reappears time-to-time
  • ‘romantic love’ never fades
  • happy to be dependent on others/depended on
  • happy to be close to others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

findings for insecure-avoidant (type A) of hazar & shaver 1987

A
  • feared intimacy
  • emotional highs/lows
  • jealous
  • believed they didn’t need love to be happy
  • uncomfortable being close &/or depending on others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

findings for insecure-resistant (type C) of hazar & shaver 1987

A
  • love was involving obsession
  • desire for reciprocation
  • emotional highs/lows
  • extreme sexual attraction & jealousy
  • worry that partners didn’t love them/would abandon them
  • desire for intense closeness could frighten others away
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

conclusion of hazar & shaver 1987

A

evidence to support the concept of internal working model having a life-long impact. however, they concluded that not everyone stayed true to their infant attachment style & some people grew as they got older.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

kerns (1994)

A

securely attached babies tend to go on to form the best quality childhood friendships whereas insecurely attached babies later have friendship difficulties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

myron-wilson & smith (1998) procedure & results

A

bullying behaviour can be predicted by attachment type
procedure:
- assessed attachment type & bullying involvement using standard questionnaires
- 196 children aged 7-11 from london
results:
- secure children unlikely to be involved in bullying
- insecure-avoidant children most likely to be victims
- insecure-resistant children most likely to be bullies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

which 2 major adult experiences does the IWW effect

A
  • romantic relationships
  • parental relationships w/ own children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

who completed another study on the affect of IWW on adult relationships (other than hazan & shaver 1987)

A

McCarthy (1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

procedure of mccarthy (1999)

A
  • studied 40 adult women who’d been assessed as babies to establish attachment type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

results of mccarthy (1999)

A
  • those assessed as securely-attached had best adult friendships & romantic relationships
  • those classed as insecure-resistant had problems maintaining friendships
  • those classed as insecure-avoidant struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships
17
Q

who completed a study on the affect of IWW on the ability to parent their own children

A

bailey et al. 2007

18
Q

procedure of bailey et al. 2007

A
  • considered attachments of 99 mothers to their babies & own mothers
  • mother-baby attachment assessed via strange situation
  • mother-mother attachment assessed via adult attachment interview
19
Q

results of bailey et al. 2007

A
  • majority of women had same attachment type as their babies & mothers
20
Q

AO3

A

+)
P: research support for research into attachment & later relationships
E: reviews of studies linking attachment to later development (eg. fearon & roisman 2017) have concluded early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional well-being & attachment to own children. the strength of the relationship between early attachment type & later development depends on which attachment type & aspects of later development. even though insecure-avoidant attachment doesn’t show many disadvantages for development, disorganised attachment is strongly associated with later mental disorders.
T: secure attachment as a baby seemingly conveys advantages for future development whilst disorganised attachments may be seriously disadvantageous to children
COUNTERPOINT
-)
P: not all evidence supports existence of close links between early attachment & later development
E: regensburg longitudinal study (becker-stoll et al. 2008) followed 43 individuals from 1 year old. at age 16, attachment was assessed using adult attachment interview & there was no evidence of continuity
T: it’s not clear to what extent the quality of early attachment really predicts later development - may be other important factors

-)
P: early attachment assessed retrospectively
E: most research on link between early attachment & later development aren’t longitudinal. instead, researchers usually ask adolescent/adult participants about their relationships with parents & identify attachment type. this causes 2 validity problems - for example, asking questions relies on honesty & accurate perception of participant. secondly, it’s very hard to know whether what is being assessed is early attachment or adult attachment.
T: measures of early attachment used in most studies may be confounded by other factors making them meaningless

-)
P: confounding variables
E: some studies assess attachment in infancy (eg. mccarthy) meaning assessment of early attachment is valid. however, these studies may have validity problems due to associations between attachment quality & later development being confounded. for example, parenting style may influence attachment quality & later development. on the other hand, genetically-influenced personality may be an influence on both factors
T: we can never be entirely sure it’s early attachment & not other factors influencing later development

-)
P: alternative explanations
E: temperament hypothesis (kagan 1982) argues some infants are born with an innate personality making them more friendly & so it’s easier for the mother/caregiver to be caring & nurturing whereas, other infants may have difficult personalities that will make it less likely for the mother to want to comfort them
T: thus, early attachment type may not be a valid explanation for impacts on later adult relationships