types and explanations for conformity Flashcards
what did helbert kelman (1958) suggest were the three ways in which people conform to the opinion of a majority?
- internalisation
- identification
- compliance
what is internalisation?
- when a person genuinely accepts the group norms
- results in a private and public change of opinions / behaviour
- change is usually permanent as attitudes have been internalised ie. become part of the way the person thinks
- change in opinions / behaviour persists even in the absence of other group members
what is identification?
- conforming to the opinions / behaviour of a group because there is something about that group we value
> we identify with the group, so we want to be part of it - publicly and privately change opinions / behaviour to be accepted by group
- change of belief or behaviour is temporary
- eg. being silly and then acting serious in an office
what is compliance?
- going along with the group to fit in
- conforms publicly but privately disagrees
- behaviour or opinion stops as soon as group pressure stops
who developed the two-process theory and what is it?
- deutsch and gerard (1955)
- there are two main reasons people conform: need to be right (ISI) and need to be liked (NSI)
what is informational social influence (ISI)?
- basic human need to feel confident that their opinions, beliefs and perceptions are correct
- leads to public and private conformity (internalisation) because once we’re convinced that someone else’s behaviour or opinion is correct, we conform privately in our attitudes then also conform in our public attitudes and behaviour
- this is because when we are unsure and not confident in our opinions we may seek other people’s opinions or observe their behaviours
- most likely to occur when the situation is ambiguous and the right action is unclear. also where we believe others to be experts who know more than us in that situation
what is normative social influence (NSI)?
- because as a social species, humans have a fundamental need for social companionship and fear of rejection
- we evaluate our behaviours and opinions against others
- leads to compliance (public but not private conformity)
- to gain approval and acceptance by others we may conform to the behaviour of these groups or say that we agree with their viewpoint
- to avoid rejection or disapproval by others we may conform because we do not wish to go against the group’s behaviour or opinions
- they must believe that they are under surveillance by the group ie. that their behaviour and opinions are being judge by the people around them
evaluation: research support for NSI (asch 1951)
- asked his ps why they conformed; some said they felt self-conscious giving the correct answer and were afraid of disapproval
- when ps wrote their answers down, conformity fell to 12.5%
evaluation: research support for NSI (priebe and spink 2014)
- asked 65 ps to hold a plank for as long as possible
- when half were told that 80% like them could hold for 20% longer, their 2nd attempt was far longer
evaluation: research support for NSI (schultz et al. 2008)
hotel guests who were told ‘75% of guests choose to reuse their towels each day’ had a 25% reduced towel need
evaluation: research support for ISI (lucas et al. 2006)
- ps conformed more often to incorrect answers when they were given difficult maths problems
- ps didn’t want to be wrong so relied on the answers they were given
evaluation: research support for ISI (jenness 1932)
- asked ps to estimate no. of jellybeans in a jar
- ps made their own private estimates and then discussed with group
- individual’s 2nd private estimate shifted to agree with group estimate
evaluation: unclear if NSI or ISI is at work (asch 1955)
- conformity was reduced when there was one other dissenting p
- dissenter could reduce power of NSI as they provide social support. or could reduce power of ISI as they provide an alternative source of info
- hard to separate NSI and ISI; both processes probably operate together in most real-world conformity situations
evaluation: individual differences, NSI does not predict conformity in every case (mcghee and teevan 1967
- nAffiliators were more likely to conform
- nAffiliators are greatly concerned with being liked by others
- NSI underlies conformity for some people more than it does for others
- individual differences in conformity can’t be fully explained by one general theory of situational pressures
evaluation: NSI/ISI distinction is not useful
- asch’s research demonstrates that both NSI and ISI are reasons for conformity
- eg. in terms of group unanimity, a unanimous group is a powerful source of disapproval (NSI), but also conveys the impression that everyone else knows and you don’t (ISI)
- using two explanations together is a useful way of explaining why people conform