tumor specific 25% LC Flashcards
what is the only fda approved veterinary therapy that is adaptive and specific ?
xenogenic DNA vaccine
- oncept
Most common loss of heterozygosity ?
mutations in tumor suppressor genes - p53
examples of loss of heterozygosity mutations
p53
PTCH
BRAF (human melanoma)
loss of INK4a (familial cut melanoma)
common locations of melanoma
- digital, nail bed, foot padn- dog
- haired skin
- oral cavity
- GI tract
- eye,
- nasal cavity
- anal sac
- mucocutaneous junctions
Oral melanoma, should you remove unilateral LN vs both LN vs no literature to support removing LN ?
histologic examination of the LN is recommended either through excision of the major LNs of the head and neck or sentinel LN (SLN) mapping
Selective lymphadenectomy avoids the indiscriminate extirpation of multiple LNs and, because it is a less extensive surgical dissection, reduces the risk of postoperative complications
equine melanoma treated with doxorubicin response rate
25% CR
ORR 47%
location of metastatic melanomas
lymph nodes, lungs, liver, meniges, adrenal gland
most common oral malignancy in the dog and common locations
melanoma
gingiva, lips, tongue, and hard pal- ate
oral melanoma common breeds
goldens, scottish terriers, chow chows, poodles, dachshunds
differentials for oral tumors
melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, fibrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, acanthomatous ameloblastoma, and peripheral odontogenic fibroma
melanoma ihc cocktail
PNL2, Melan A, S100, tyrosinase, vimentin
BRAF mutations are common in human UV induced melanoma are they common in dog oral melanoma
no but they do have downstream ERK constituative activation
melanoma- associated genes clustered in the areas related to what pathways and processes
focal adhesion and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, extracellular matrix–receptor interactions, and protein digestion and absorption
a small subset of dogs with malignant melanoma have mutations in what gene at what exon
c-kit exon 11
biologic behavior of haired skin melanoma
benign
surgery is curative with clean margins
What kind of vaccine is the k9 melanoma vax ONCEPT?
Xenogenic plasmid with human tyrosinase
What are prognostic factors for digit/nailbed tumors?
High stage regardless histo
distant mets in melanoma
Tx and survival times for digit/nailbed SCC?
Dog with sx good 2yr 40% and subungal better with 2yr 75%,
Cat 73days-30wk
2.5 mths - 7.5 mths
Tx and survival for digit melanoma? stage 1
Amp MST 12 months 1yr survivial ~ 50%
2 yr survival 12%
sx+Vax MST 476 days (16mths)
digital melanoma metastasis at diagnosis
30 - 40 %
how do dogs with digital melanoma die from their disease
distant or local mets
What are some molecular pathways that are mutated/changed with melanoma?
C-erb2, c-myc, BRAF(human), VEGF, β catnenin
What are prognositic factors for skin melanoma?
Histology, mitotic, location, breed, DNA ploidy, proliferation, lymphatic invasion
What are prognostic factors for oral melanoma?
Mitotic, size, stage, mets, bone lysis, location
What is the survival time with oral melanoma based on stage treated with surgery ?
Stage 1 (<2 cm no mets)- 12 - 30 months,
stage 2 (2-4cm no mets)- 5 - 27 months,
stage 3- (>4 cm +/- LN mets) 5 - 7 months
Stage 4 (distant mets) 80 days
dogs with stage I oral melanoma treated with standardized therapies, including surgery, RT, and/or chemotherapy, have an MST of approximately
12-14 mths
dogs die of distant mets not local recurrence
stage 1 oral melanoms PFS
19 months
melanoma staging
TNM WHO staging
in melanoma what % of LN are metastatic that are normal in size? big in size?
LN metastasis is present in approximately 70% of dogs with lymphadenomegaly
mets in approximately 40% with normal sized LNs.
what is an advance novel staging modality that may show melanoma mets
gallium citrate scintigraphy
CT
surgical margins for cutaneous melanomas
1 cm and 1 fascial plane deep
malignant melanomas surgical margins
2-3 cm wide and one fascial plane deep - underlying bone resection encouraged
or follow with RT
oral melanoma prognosis without complete excision
65 days
Dogs with incomplete histologic excision are 3.6 times more likely to die of tumor-related causes compared with dogs with complete histologic excision
melanoma behind premolar 3 were how much more likely to cause death (as opposed to rostral tumors)
4.3 times more likely to cause tumor related death
mst oral melanoma no sx
65 days - 2 mths
How does the melanoma vaccine Oncept work?
Human tyrosinase expressed on melanocytes causes Ab & Tcell response, same species do not generate enough response but xenogenic overcomes self tolerance
dendritic
What is survival in CMM with vaccine?
Stage 2-3 locoregional control 569 days. (19 mths)
What is unique about melanoma and RT?
Melanoma low a/B so hypofractionated or course fx better than small dose/fx
Low α/β ratio, or increased sensitivity to large fraction size 5-9 gy ( more acute tox less late tox)
melanoma response to RT?
Yes, 80-94% respond overall
25 - 70% cr
20 - 70% PR
recent study 0% response, 73% stable
pfs with rt for canine melanomas
PFS 4-8 months
How does RT+carbo work for melanoma?
Carbo thought to sensitize but differing results on if it helps, more AE with combo
What are the most common eye tumors in cats and dogs?
Dog conjunctiva melanoma
Cat anterior uveal melanoma
What are risk factors for developing ocular tumors?
UV, trauma
What ocular tumor are blue-eyed dogs at risk for developing?
Spindle cell sarcoma
What ocular tumors have the highest metastatic rate?
cat uveal intraocular melanoma and orbital tumors
melanoma mets but very slowly
local recurrence rate after rt in microscopic dz setting (melanoma)
26%
local recurrence rate after rt in macroscopic dz setting (melanoma)
45%
MST for dogs treated with RT with melanomas
4.5 - 15 months
RT protocols for melanoma
8 Gy x 4 (32Gy)
6 Gy x 6 (36 Gy)
cats treated with rt with oral melanoma mst
146 d (~5 mo)
one complete response
two partial response
dog with t1 or t2 melanoma treated with carbo radiosensitization 6gy x 6
recurrence rate
tt mets
mst
15% recurrence
10.2 months till mets
mst 12 months
dogs with oral melanoma treated with surgery and carboplatin
pfs
mst
when rt added?
recurrence rate?
overall median PFS (259 days - 9 mth)
MST (440 days - 15mth)
- did not significantly change when RT was added to the treatment protocol
- proportion of dogs with local recurrence was lower in the RT group (27%) compared with dogs not treated with RT (67%)
malignant melanoma in oral and non oral sites treated with RT vs RT + temozolamide
ORR
TTP
MST
ORR not sig diff - 81-87%
TTP - 205 d (6.8 mo) with RT+ temo vs 110 (3.5 mo) with RT only
MST not stat sig - 192 d (6.4 mo) vs 402 d (13 mo)
rt and melanoma tumor size MST
size <5cm3 86 weeks- 22 mths
5-15 cm3 16 wks - 4 mths
> 15 cm3 21 wks - 5 mths
RT and melanoma and VEGF
dogs with higher plasma VEGF levels treated with hypofractionated protocols had a shorter time to treatment failure and a shorter MST
RR for gross melanomas treated with:
cisplatin/piroxicam
carbo
chemo in general
- 18%
- 28%
five retrospective studies investigating the role of chemotherapy in the adjuvant set- ting after either surgery or RT found no significant differences in outcomes with the addition of chemotherapy to the treatment protocol
result of oncept trials
(1) is safe
(2) leads to the development of antityrosinase antibodies and T cells (3) is potentially therapeutic
(4) is an attractive candidate for further evaluation in an adjuvant, minimal residual disease phase II setting for canine MM
stage 3 and 4 melanoma treated with masitinib
MST
AE
success
MST 119d - 4 mth
low grade ae in all dogs - anemia diarrhea and anorexia
not good as single agent
microRNA expression in
CMM
OMM
CMM - decreased in some and increased in others
OMM - downregualted
checkpoint expression in melanomas vs melanocytomas
PD1/PDL1 sig higher in melanoma
can endotracheal intubation cause seeding of OMM
Suspected Iatrogenic Seeding of Oral Melanoma Secondary to Endotracheal Intubation in a Dog
pleural effusion reportedly melanocytic
following incomplete mm removal in a dog
Correlation Between KIT Expression and c-Kit Mutations in 2 Subtypes of Canine Oral Melanocytic Neoplasm
No relationship between c-Kit mutations and KIT expression
This DOES NOT support the used of c-kit targeting therapies
tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in oral melanoma
longer survial associated with higher TIL scores and higher CD8+ lymphs
lower CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+Tregs
tumor size as a predictor of lymphatic invasion in omm
tumors <6.5mm (<0.6 cm) had no lymphatic invasion with 100% sn
tumors >24.5 mm (>2.4 cm) had guarantee of lymphatic invasion of 100% sp
expression of cyclin D1, Ki67 in omm
Cyclin D1 was detected in 69%
Ki-67 was present in 88.5%
cyclin d1 may be a marker of prognosis
somatic focal amplification on chromocome 30 Canis Familiaris [CFA] associated with what type of melanoma
amelanotic omm
linked to poor prognosis
prognostic factors for omm
gingival location MUTLIPLE STUDIES, lymphadenomegally, tumor ulceration, >6 mf
Important draining LN in OMM according to Javma study
frequency of LN mets in a OMM
frequency of contralateral ln
37% LN in omm
MRLN 81% (18% of these did not have mand ln)
23% contralateral
Evaluation of prognostic impact of pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte and lymphocyte to monocyte ratios in dogs with oral malignant melanoma treated with surgery and adjuvant CSPG4-antigen electrovaccination
No sig associated between leukocyte ratios and outcome
Evaluation of accuracy for 18F-FDG positron emission tomography and computed tomography for detection of lymph node metastasis in canine oral malignant melanoma
CT clinical grading sens 83%, spec 94%
PET techniques 100% sens but requires SUV (standard uptake value) standardization to be specific
Difference in outcome DFI and ost between curative intent vs marginal excision as a first treatment in dogs with oral malignant melanoma and the impact of adjuvant CSPG4-DNA electrovaccination
DFI sig shorter in dogs with marginal excision over curative intent (6 mths vs 8 th) but not sig. on OST
Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 4 [CSPG4]
cellular membrane Ag overexpressed in canine melanoma cells (57%)
early cell surface progression marker involved in tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion
bone invasion impact on ost for omm
Dogs with bone invasion was sig shorter than without 397 d (13 mth) vs 1063 d (35 mth)
worse ost with high Ki67 and MC >4
pfs and ost in gross omm treated with 36gy
pfs 171 d - 6mth
ost 232 d - 8 mth
improved if low WHO stage (I/II) and irradiating subclinical disease
omm and phagocytic activity
Canine oral primary melanoma cells exhibit shift to mesenchymal phenotype and phagocytic behavior which may play a role in progression
CD146 expression on OMM
expressed on on primary melanoma cells
maybe be a prognostic marker
Long-term survival of dogs with stage 4 oral malignant melanoma treated with anti-canine PD-1 therapeutic antibody
pulmonary nodules regressed
local tumro control
2 dogs
what is the effect of FOXP3, CD3, and IDO on cutaneous melanomas
Increased risk of tumor related death with increased FoxP3 cells per HPF and CD3+ cells that were FoxP3+ surrounding the tumor, and IDO+/HPF
IDO+/HPF independent prognostic factor
metastatic rate of foot pad melanoma
55%
outcome of food pad melanoma treated with surgery +/- adjuvant therapy
PFI 101 d (3.5 mth)
MST 240 d (8 mth)
adjuvant therapy did not improve outcome
TIL in feline mnelanocytic tumorts
TIL increased with MC and cellular pleomorphism
TIL Inversely associated with positive melan A PNL2 staining cells
TIL may be associated with features of malignancy
nasal planum melanocytic tumors in cats predisposing factor
pigmentation
nasal planum melanocytic tumors in cats MST
265d (9 mth)
LN mets in one
short term remission acheived with rt
is circulating cell free dna in cats with diffuse iris melanoma useful
not a good markers even if mets
non ocular melanomas in cats prognostic factors
tumor site ( lips, oral, nasal, mucosa, nasal planum )
MC >4
intratumoral necrosis
grading of non ocular melanomas in cats
SN and SP of the scheme
high grade if aggressive location and one of these: mc>4, intratumoral necrosis present
high grade if other location and both MC>4 and necrosis
80% sensitivity, 92% specificity for predicting tumor related death
MST of non ocular melanomas in cats
MST high grade 90 days
MST low grade not reached
TIL and prognostic factors in canine melanoma
CD20+ TILS sig associated with MI, pleomorphism, and pigmentation as well as tumor related death, presence of mets/recurrence, shorter OST and DFI
high CD20 is neg prog indicator
pevonedistat is a selective NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE) inhbitor. what is its affect on malignant melanoma cells
Pevonedistat sig reduced viability of cells in dose and time dependent manner.
Promotes apoptosis and inhibits growth through DNA re-replication and cell senescence
- Some cell lines resistant
- P21 levels increased in more sensitive lines
COX 2 expression in cutaneous melanomas
over expressed in 42% OF CMM
cox 2 expression in oral mm
over expressed in 34% of omm
Histone demethylase inhibitors may be a potential therapeutic strategy for OMM. may decrease resistance to what chemotherapeutics
platinum agents
JARID1B
histone demethylase that causes proliferation dormancy and decreases drug sensitivity
highly expressed in canine melanomas
Antitumour effects of Liporaxel (oral paclitaxel) for canine melanoma
Induced anti angiogenesis - CD31 antibody on ihc
Induced apoptosis - terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick End labeling assay (TUNEL)
Down regulated cyclin d1 and inhibited cell proliferation - western blot
what cbc findings might you see in a cat with an intestinal mast cell tumor
anemia from perforation
commonly have mastocytosis and eosinophils
when combining vinblastine and palladia for mast cell tumor treatment what is recommended in terms of dosing and why
1.6 mg/m2 vinb - 20% dose reduction from low end 50% dose reduction from high end
palladia 3.25 mg/kg (2.75 in a later paper)
neutropenia is DLT
What do mast cells contain?
Histamine, heparin, vasoactive amines, prostagladinD, proteolytic enzymes
What other disease in dog have mast cells in periphery?
Parvo, skin diz, trauma, other neoplasia
breeds commonly affected by MCT
mbd, boxer, Bos- ton terrier, English bulldog, pug, Labrador and golden retrievers, cocker spaniels, schnauzers, Staffordshire terriers, beagles, Rhode- sian ridgebacks, Weimaraners, and Chinese shar-pei
genes identified in Goldens with MCT
GNAI2 gene and multiple genes associated with hyaluronic acid synthesis may be risk factors for MCT development
how do MCT in young animals behave
can spontaneously regress
described in cats, pigs, horse, and humans
one report of multiple mct regressing in jack Russel
is there a cause of MCT
thought to be chronic inflammation or skin irritants
Chromosomal fragile site expression, a phenomenon thought to genetically predispose humans to develop certain tumors, was shown to be increased in boxer dogs with MCT
VEGFR2 activation and mct
vegf expression has bee shown in many mct
preliminary evidence that VEGFR2 activation may be associated with inferior post surgical outcomes
Which breeds have benign MCT?
boxer, pug, bulldog, goldens in one study
Which breeds have malignant MCT?
GR, mastiff, Shar-pei, rottweiler, Shih Tzu, frenchie, pit bull
Survival of gastric MCT?
10% @ <6months
Are multiple cutaneous MCT worse or better? What stage?
Stage3, Don’t know if de novo but one study MST not reached
What are the metastatic rates with grade in MCT?
Grade1 <10%,
grd2 5-22%,
grd3 55-96%
What is the survival with mets to liver, spleen, abdominal Ln for MCT?
34 days
What is the metastatic rate of SQ MCT?
6%
Prognostic factors for MCT?
Grade, proliferation, size (own , ckit, location, stage(1vs. 3)
What is survival with MI in MCT?
MC <5 MST 70months 5.8 yrs
MC >5 MST 2 months regardless of grade
vs
MC < 7 MST >2 YEARS low grade
MC >7 MST < 4 mth high grade
What is survival with Grade 2 MCT Ki67 >1.8
1yr survival 43%
2yr survival 21%
What locations have been associated with decreased survival for mct?
Mucocutaneous, nailbed, inguinal/peringuinal
Is inguinal truly worse for mct location?
Not in one study but preputial/scrotal MST 4.2months
What is the survival of oral/perioral mct?
MST 52months that decrease to 14months if mets
What is the survival of muzzle mct?
what % have mets at dx
MST 30 months, with 46% with mets @dx
What % of pathologist agreed on grade 1-2 patnick MCT?
<64%
What characteristics are evaluated for 2-tier MCT grading?
Mc, bizarre nuclei, multinucleated cells, karomegaly
What is the % recurrence with incomplete margins mct ?
25-30% especially grade 2
What is the survival with 2-tier MCT grading?
Low >2yr
High 4months
What is the survival with grade3 sx alone?
MST 9months, recurrence 50-60%
What is rr of palladia with RT for gross MCT?
ORR 76.4%
MST not reached
what is rr of pred with rt for gross mct?
ORR 88.5%
PFS 1031days(34 mo. 2.8yr)
Survival times for grade3 MCT sx with vinblastin/pred?
MST 1374 days (45 mo, 3 yr), another not reached
What is the response with pred/vinblastine in gross MCT?
rr 47%
MST 154days
grd3 MST 134days
What is the % response with vincristine and vinorelbine with gross MCT?
Vinc 7%, vinorelbine 13%
What is the response with CCNU with MCT sx removed?
42%
What are the responses of mct with hydroxyurea and chlorambucil?
Hydroxy-28%,
Chloram-38%
What is the survival with bone marrow mets in MCT?
With CCNU MST 43 days, symptomatic ~30days
What is the MST with grade 3 met with mets?
194 day(6 mo) vs. 503 (16 mo) if no mets
What is the MST with grade3 mct with Ln mets and tx/
240 days (8 mo) with tx and 42d if no tx
What is the survival with SQ MCT?
With incomplete margins MST 1199days (~40 mo, ~3 yr)
What feline breed is associated with a better prognosis with MCT?
Siamese, usually younger and develop histiocytic form
Where is MCT diz located in cats?
More visceral, GI and generally do not have cutaneous lesion associated (unlike dogs)
What other disease cause circulating mast cells in cats?
None, generally just MCT; 50% splenic have in BM
What is the tx and survival for splenic MCT in cats?
splenectomy even if distant mets can do well MST 12-19months, chemo unknown
Tx and prognosis with cutaneous MCT in cats?
Surgery with smaller margins because most benign, Histiocytic “wait & see’
Tx and survival with GI MCT in cats?
Surgery need large margins, most succumb to diz quickly
less than 1 year
What is sclerosing GI MCT in cats?
New GI variant, 23/25 cats dead in 2 months
What are the different histologic forms of MCT in the cat?
Histiocytic (spontaneously resolves); Mastocytic-compact (benign),
Diffuse (anaplastic malignant)
Patnaik grading scheme
Gr 1 - 3
looking at depth of invasion, cellular atypic, granularity, nuclear feature, MC, and multi nucleation
Kiupel grading scheme
high or low
HIGH =
MC >7/10hpf ,
>3 cells with multi nucleation/10hpf ,
>3 bizarre nuclei/hpf ,
karyomegaly >10% of cells
MC <7 low grade
bostock mct grading scheme
opposite of patnaik
gr I = anaplastic undifferentiated - highly cellular irregular size and shaped of nuclei, frequent mitosis, few granules
gr ii = intermediate grade, closely packed cells with indistinct cell borders, lower n:c ratio compare to anaplastic, infrequent mitosis, more granules than anaplastic
grIII = clearly defined cell boundaries, well differentiated, spherical or oval nuclei, rare or absent mitosis, large deep staining granules
based on a consensus statement and a study comparing the 2 and 3 category mct grading schemes what recommendation can be made about staging low grade tumors
staging should be recommended regardless of grade to local LN but full staging may not be necessary for low grade tumors
15% of Kiupel low grade tumors had more aggressive behavior
based on mct consensus statement what is the preferred mct grading scheme
kiupel + Ki67 & AgNOR
- help you understand low grade tumors risk of local recurrence
WHO staging scheme of mct
0 = one tumor incompletely excised form the dermis identified histologically without regional ln involvement
a - without signs
b - with systemic signs
1 = one tumor confined to the dermis without regional LN involvement
a - without signs
b - with systemic signs
2 = one tumor confined to the dermis with regional ln involvement
a - without signs
b - with systemic signs
3 = multiple dermal tumors, large infiltrating tumors with or without regional Ln involvement
a - without signs
b - with systemic signs
4 = any tumor with distant metastasis including bone marrow
proposed staging from consensus
Stage I Single tumor, without regional lymph node involvement
Stage II Multiple tumors (≥3), without regional lymph node involvement
Stage III Single tumor, with regional lymph node involvement
Stage IV Large and infiltrative tumors, without delineation, or multiple
tumors (≥3), with regional lymph node involvement
Stage V Any tumor with distant metastasis, including bone marrow invasion
and the presence of mast cells in the peripheral blood
dog with multiple cutaneous tumors - what stage and how does it affect prognosis?
stage 3 for WHO or 4 on new staging
Several studies indicate that there is no difference in outcome between patients with a single cutaneous MCTs and those with multiple MCT
others have suggested an inferior outcome in dogs with multiple tumors
dog with dermal mct and regional Ln metastasis what stage and how does it affect prognosis ?
stage 2 for WHO and stage 3 for new scheme
In 3 studies, the presence of MCs in the regional LNs was a negative prognostic factor for disease-free interval (DFI) and survival
however
Other studies have shown that dogs with intermediately differentiated MCTs with LN metastasis may have a good prognosis if the affected LN is removed and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or RT is administered.
grade seems more impt for outcome
histologic grading scheme of mct metastatic lymph nodes
HN0 = not metastatic, None to rare (0-3), scattered, individualized mast cells in sinuses (subcapsular, paracortical or medullary) and/or parenchyma per field
HN1= Pre Metastatic, Greater than three individualized mast cells in sinuses (subcapsular, paracortical or medullary)
and/or parenchyma in a minimum of 4 fields
HN2 = early metastatic, Aggregates of mast cells (>3 associated cells) in sinuses (subcapsular, paracortical or medullary) and/or parenchymal, or sinusoidal sheets of mast cells
HN3 = overtly metastatic, Disruption or effacement of normal nodal architecture by discrete foci, nodules, sheets, or overt masses composed of mast cells
dfi and ST for HN0/1 tumors
DFI for those classified as HN0/1 was not reached
MST was 1,824 days = 5 yrs
The 2-year disease-free percentages and survival percentages were 90% for HN0/1
dfi and st for HN2/3 tumors
DFI was not reached
MST was 804 days = 27 mths
The 2-year disease-free percentages and survival percentages were 56% for HN2/3.
MST for poorly differentiated tumors with LN mets vs no LN mets
what happens to ST if you treat the LN
high grade Ln mets ST = 194 d = 6.5. mth
high grade NO LN mets ST = 503 d =17 mths
treatment of the LN improved MST (240 days = 8 mth) compared with those dogs whose LNs were not treated (42 days)
how does the biologic behavior of a mct affect outcome
recent rapid progression is a worse outcome
local tumor ulceration, erythema, or pruritus have worse prognosis
recurrence after surgery is a worse prognosis
** all shown in few studies - not definitive**
Comparison of histologic margin status in low-grade cutaneous and subcutaneous canine mast cell tumours examined by radial and tangential sections
Radial sections: 4 radial sections of 5 directions (cr, cd, d, v, and deep) to inked margins
Tangential sections: taken parallel to the ink edge covering great % of total margin surface area
Tangential sections detect sig. More incomplete surgical margins
** 23% are categorized as neg on radial that were pos on tangential sectioning**
Radial sections incorrectly called clean – 50% of margins
when to use radial versus tangential mct margins
Radial sections have 100% specificity of predicting negative tangential margins at a cut point of 10.9 mm
if margins <10.9 mm tangential sectioning should be used
Amount of skin shrinkage affecting tumor versus grossly normal marginal skin of dogs for cutaneous mast cell tumors excised with curative intent
17.7% shrinkage with tumor shrinkage (4.45%) < normal skin shrinkage (24.42%)
Equation created to estimate post excisional margins from pre excisional measurements for mct
18.4%
(pre- excisional margin = postformalin margin/0.244)
compared to intra op how much did the length of surgical margins decrease at each processing step?
for mct
for sts
Compared to intra op measurements the length of surgical margins decreased at each processing step by median of
- 3 mm post op, 5 mm post fix, and 8.8 mm on glass/HTFM for MCT
- 2.5 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm for STS
Max reduction in the total length of margins was 29.6 mm for MCT and 24.2 mm for STS
prognostic factors for mct
grade
stage
location
Proliferation - MC, AgNOR, Ki67
growth rate
microvessel density
recurrence
systemic signs
age
breed
sex f>m
tumor size
c-kit mutation - worse
DNA copy number