Tuesday Test Flashcards

1
Q

Define reliability

A

Whether the research can be replicated through a standardised procedure to produce consistent results

  • To what extent can it be accurately replicated?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define validity

A
  • Does it measure what it’s supposed to measure?

Internal = are the variables controlled. Are you sure of the IVs impact on the DV?

External = can it be applied to a real life scenario? (Ecological validity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define subjectivity

A

When the research/results are open to interpretation, opinions and research a bias (Qualitative data)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define objectivity

A

When the research is not open to interpretation, opinions or researcher bias
(Quantitive data)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strengths of quantitive data

A
  • It’s objective - making it easy to analyse and compare data.
    -As it’s not open to interpretation, it’s also a lot less time-consuming meaning more data can be collected which makes the research more reliable and easier to generalise.
  • Reliable and highly scientific because the reseach do not need to be personally interpreted, it is clear and objective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weaknesses to quantitive data

A
  • Numerical data only tells you how often behaviour occurs not the underlying motivation or thoughts - this undermines the research validity
  • It cannot generate qualitative data whereas qualitative data can be broken down to generate quantitive data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strengths to qualitative data

A
  • It produces more detail and allows researchers to make more in-depth conclusions (high ecological validity)
  • It can be broken down into quantitive data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Weaknesses to qualitative data

A
  • It’s difficult to analyse statistically and therefore hard to generalise from

-It’s more likely subjective research which is open to interpretation, opinions and research a bias (low internal validity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples of quantitive data

A

Numerical data, closed questions or likert/ranking scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Examples of qualitative data

A

Open-ended surveys, self report data, interviews, case studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are open questions?

A

Questions that can be answered subjectively, participants can explain and express opinions. It is not a numerical or straight up response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are closed questions?

A

Questions that have a fixed/limited amount of responses. They are very clear and objective
E.g - yes or no or multiple choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the likert/ranking scales?

A

Where participants rate their opinion/attitude through multiple choice or a numerical value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is self report data?

A

Information elicited from questions that rely on participants reporting their own behaviour/feelings
E.g - interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 advantages of the likert/ranking scales

A
  • Easy to analyse and compare data
  • ## Less time consuming so more data can be produced, it can be easily replicated and reliable therefore more generalisable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2 disadvantages of the likert/ranking scales

A
  • They do not generate in-depth, quality responses and participants cannot expand on their views so it may not be an accurate reflection of their thoughts/behaviour
  • Pps may have different opinions to the options available - therefore it is restricting the pps from answering honestly and reducing the validity of the research
17
Q

Strength and weaknesses of closed questions

A

S
- Easy to replicate for reliability
- Easy to interpret and statistically analyse - objective
- Well controlled as the questions require a clear defined response

W
- Demand characteristics I’m more likely to occur as there are ‘socially desirable answers’ - reducing validity
- Limited options may produce a lack of engagement

18
Q

Strength and weaknesses of open questions

A

S
- Detailed and more valid in-depth responses as people can express their opinions
- Good way of accessing pps motivations and feelings

W
- Subjective interpretation means low reliability
- Hard to analyse statistically
- More time consuming meaning less participant data meaning less generalisable

19
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of self-report data

A

S
- More detail into participants thoughts and feelings
- Psychologist can investigate future behaviour from pps from their thought processes
- Pps can use their own experiences increasing the ecological validity

W
- Relies on honest, insightful, articulate pps
- Pps may give ‘socially desirable answers’ to reflect social norms

20
Q

What is a questionnaire?

A

A set of predetermined questions aimed to elicit the attitudes and opinions of participants about an issue

21
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires

A

S
- Time and cost-effective - they can be quickly administered online
This means more people can take part making the results more reliable and generalisable
- Private and anonymous = more honest opinions which improves validity
- Reduced researcher involvement reduces the chance of researcher bias

W
- Response rates can be poor without the presence of a researcher which makes the results hard to generalise
- It may be that only certain types of people take part in questionnaire - not representative of a wider population
- Be difficult to phrase questions in ways that are objective for pps to answer

22
Q

What is an interview?

A

When the researcher and participants engage in a face-to-face conversation gaining verbal information

23
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of interviews

A

S
- A well conducted interview can address sensitive issues that other methods are not able to address
- A good source of qualitative data

W
- Research a bias and demand characteristics are more likely
- It may only be confident, honest and articulate individuals who volunteer which is not representative of a wider population
- The research is highly dependent on the skills of the interviewer especially with unstructured interviews