Trophic Relationships and plant-animal interactions Flashcards
Trophic levels
Primary producers =
plants
* Primary consumers =
herbivores
* Secondary consumers =
predators = carnivores
who eat herbivores
* Tertiary consumers =
carnivores who eat
secondary consumers
(not shown in figure to
the right; also
“predators”)
* Decomposers = eat
dead organic matter
Indirect Effects
One species alters the effect that another
species has on a third
* Already talked about one example:
Exploitative or
scramble
competition, if
the contested
resource is
a species
Trophic Cascades: “HSS”
Interactions between
two trophic levels
‘cascade’ to a third
trophic level
Why is the world green
“The world is green” because carnivores
keep down herbivores so herbivores don’t
limit plant growth
* Example of an indirect effect: one trophic
level exerts influence on a second by
affecting a third
* Trophic cascades involve effects that
alternate across trophic levels
* Can drastically affect communities
Top-down versus bottom-up
control
Top-down control: abundances kept low
because of predation
(Experimental test = predator removal)
* Bottom-up control: abundances kept low
because of resource limitation
(Experimental test = resource addition)
Will lizards benefit plants or not?
Lizards eat spiders
* Lizards eat herbivores
* Spiders eat herbivores
* Herbivores eat plants
* Trophic cascades likely,
but can’t answer from
topology of the food web
alone …
* … so must do
experiments!
Lizards do benefit plants because
of unequal interaction strengths
The effect of lizards on
spiders is weak
* But the effect of lizards on
herbivores is strong
* So lizards reinforce, rather
than counteract, the
effects of spiders …
* … but it could have gone
the other way!
Trophic
cascades across
ecosystems:
far-reaching
effects
of fish in ponds
Solid lines =
Direct effects
Dashed lines =
Indirect effects
Special difficulties of herbivory
Easy to be a carnivore: animal tissues easy to
convert into animal tissues
* Plant tissues hard to convert into animal tissues
21
Special difficulties of herbivory
* Cellulose and lignin tough,
indigestible without
microbial symbionts
* Plant tissues heavily
defended against
herbivores
* Coevolutionary race
between plants and insect
herbivores is responsible
for much of biodiversity:
specialization is common
Plant-herbivore interactions as
an arms race
Plants evolve toxins to reduce herbivory; insects
evolve detoxification or other mechanisms to
overcome plant defenses
* Very common (we think plants taste OK because our
food crops have been artificially selected for low
toxicity)
* Many types of secondary chemicals; alkaloids
especially potent and prominent
* Chemicals often deter generalist herbivores
* But no plant species is toxic enough to escape from
specialist herbivores
* And specialist insects may evolve to use “defense”
chemicals as (1) feeding stimulants or (2) defence
compounds
* Result: escalation, arms race!
Challenges and solutions are
different for vertebrate herbivores
Many insects complete development on a single,
often well-defended plant; they must overcome
plant defences
* Vertebrate grazers often eat some plant tissue,
and then move on to another plant
* Vertebrate herbivores often select mixed diets
containing foods processed by different
detoxification pathways, thereby avoiding high
doses of any one toxin
* Some detoxification by microbes in fermenting
chambers