Treatment Planning Process Flashcards
Stepwise process of traditional model of dental treatment planning:
1.Evaluating and examining the px
2. Developing a problem list
3. Constructing a series of treatments
Defined as integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systemic research.
Evidence-based practice
- Integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and px values.
- Based on scientific principles and treatment regimens that have been tried, tested and proven worthy by accurate, substantiated, and reproducible studies.
Evidence-based dentistry
Merits of Evidence-based Dentistry:
- Provides the basis for moving to a specific decision (when several viable alternatives are being weighed)
- Affirms or disproves the efficacy of various dental treatments
- Gives compelling guidance to the px and dentist on the “treat versus not treat” question
Limitations of Evidence-based Dentistry:
- Several treatments do not have strong evidentiary support but may still be viable
- Presence is insufficeint to determine the viability of many treatments
- Multiple treatments need to be further analyzed
- Majority of studies fail to address patient factors
- Most studies on outcomes look exclusively at treatment efficacy and rarely correlate the efficacy with the px’s preferences and desires
Focuses on determining the patient’s probability of acquiring a specific disease or condition.
RISK ASSESSMENT
Describes the strength of the relationship between risk and future disease occurrence
DEGREE OF RISK
Ways Risk Assessment can be a Useful Adjunct to the Dental Treatment Planning Process:
- Identify if there is a need to start counseling pxs about hereditary oral conditions and diseases
- To avoid an undesirable outcome ➡️ provide prophylactic intervention
- For cases when delayed tx would put the px at risk for acquiring more comprehensive tx in the future ➡️ deliver early intervention
- For cases when px is known to be at risk ➡️ work to eliminate recognized causes of oral conditions or diseases
- Any measure that is used to foresee an individual’s risk for a condition or disease
- Related with increased probability of future condition or disease, but does not cause the disease
RISK PREDICTORS
- Condition/s for which an evident causal biologic link between the factor and the disease have been shown to be present
- Best confirmed by longitudinal studies
- 2 Categories: Modifiable and Non-modifiable Factors
RISK FACTORS
- Pertains to identifiable conditions that (when present) are known to be associated with a higher probability of the occurrence of a particular disease
- May be detected by taking a cross-sectional study
RISK INDICATORS
Involves conducting repeated observations of the same subjects over a long period of time.
LONGITUDINAL STUDY
Compares different population groups or a representative subset at a single point in time.
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Categories of Conditions or Behaviors that may be Risk indicators of Oral Disease:
- Hereditary conditions
- Systemic disease as a risk indicator for oral health problems
- Dietary and other behavioral risk indicators
- Risk indicators related to stress and anxiety
- Functional or trauma related conditions
- Environmental risk indicators
- Previous disease experience
- Socioeconomic status
Caused by an external trigger which can be short-term or long-term, but it subsided once the situation has been resolved.
STRESS
Caused by an internal trigger that is characterized by anticipation from an unknown or poorly defined threat, which continues to persist after the concern has passed.
ANXIETY
- Pertains to a prediction of a px’s future condition based on the px’s present circumstances.
- Implies the possible outcomes of a disease and the frequency with which these outcomes can be expected to occur.
PROGNOSIS
Descriptors of Prognosis:
- highest level of certainty
- confidence level is >95%
- safe to proceed without reservation
EXCELLENT
Descriptors of Prognosis:
- high probability of success
- confidence level is more than >80/85%
- safe to proceed with limited reservations
- recommendation with some caution
- restricted assurances
GOOD
Descriptors of Prognosis:
- reasonable but limited probability of success
- confidence level is 50-80%
- restricted assurance (if any)
- realistic discussions
FAIR
Descriptors of Prognosis:
- limited chances of success
- confidence level is <50%
- limited assurance of success
POOR/GUARDED
Descriptors of Prognosis:
- no reasonable chance of success
- confidence level is <5%
- elective treatment must not be initiated
HOPELESS
Descriptors of Prognosis:
- may imply that the available information is not enough to make a prognosis
- might also signify that prognosis remains unclear
- no assurance of success
UNCERTAIN/QUESTIONNABLE
Roles of Outcomes Measures:
HSRPPP
- Helps dentists select the best treatment options to discuss with the patient
- Serves as an important adjunct to the presentation of the treatment plan to the patient
- Refines the list of realistic choices
- Promotes the direct management of individual patient care
- Provides an opportunity for the dental profession to collectively compare types of care
- Presents a chance for the dental profession to mutually evaluate the effectiveness of various treatments