Treatment Planning Flashcards
phases of trauma informed care
phase 1: safety and stability - basic needs as defined by Maslow must be addressed first; interventions including case management to meet those needs. Stabilization focuses on the replacement of the problematic and risky coping strategies with others that are non-harmful.
phase 2: mourning and remembering - survivors acknowledge and speak about what happened and are ready to integrate experiences into a larger life context
phase 3: reconnection and reintegration - a commitment to move forward in life, searching for ways to use the trauma experience for empowerment
Crisis stabilization
- plan and conduct a throughout assessment
- establish a collaborative environment
- identify the major problems
- encourage and explore feelings
- generate and explore alternatives and new coping strategies
- restore functioning through implementation of an action plan
- plan follow-up
Formative Evaluations
ongoing processes that allow for feedback to be implemented during service delivery
Summative Evaluations
occur at the end of the services and provide an overall description of their effectiveness. Examine outcomes to determine whether objectives were met.
SOAP Format
Subjective: client’s report
Objective: documentation of physical examinations/indicators of problems
Assessment: combining subjective and objective
Plan: what will be done as a consequence of the assessment
Types of research: experimental
randomized experiments
Types of research: quasi-experimental
uses intervention and comparison groups but assignment to the groups is not random
Types of research: pre-experimental
contain intervention groups only and lack comparison/control groups, making the the weakest
internal validity
the extent to which causal inferences can be made about intervention and target behavior
external validity
addresses how generalizable those inferences are to the population
interrater or interobserver reliability
assesses the degree to which different raters/observers give consistent estimates of the same phenomenon
test-retest reliability
assesses the consistency of a measure from one time to another
parallel forms reliability
assess the consistency of the results of two tests constructed in the same way from the same content domain
internal consistency reliability
assesses the consistency of results across items within a test
face validity
examines whether the assessments “on the face” measure the contructs
content validity
examines whether all of the relevant content domains are covered
criterion validity
exampines whether constructs perform as anticipated in relation to other theoretical constructs
predicitive validity
assesses whether constructs predict what they should theoretically be able to predict
concurrent validity
assesses whether constructs distinguish between groups that should be able to be distinguished
convergent validity
assesses the degree to which constructs are similar to other constructs to which they should be similar
discriminant validity
assess the degree to which constructs are different from (diverge away from) other constructs to which they should be dissimilar