Trait Perspective Flashcards

1
Q

Themes of dispositional approach - 1

A

❖Continuity in thoughts, feelings, behaviors
❖Focus on individual differences, rather than
intrapersonal processes
>. Differing approaches of theorists
>. Trait-and-type approach catalogue dimensions of difference:
• traits are assumed static
• trait approach assumes stable inner qualities reflected in behaviour. i.e., predispositions to behave in certain ways
• e.g. feeling anxious & worried before novel events
• types are assumed distinct and discontinuous (e.g. introverts vs. extroverts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Themes of dispositional approach -2

A

The notion that people can be divided into different ‘types’ goes back to Hippocrates (400 BC) where
people were thought to form four groups :
1. choleric (irritable)
2. melancholic (depressed)
3. sanguine (optimistic)
4. phlegmatic (calm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types

A
  • discontinuous categories (e.g., introverts vs. extraverts)
  • represent qualitative differences in people
  • labeling convenience
  • often viewed as biologically or genetically based
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Traits

A
  • continuous dimensions (e.g., sociability, aggressiveness)
  • represent quantitative differences in people
  • individual differences reflect differences in amount of a trait
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Views of Traits

A

❖Nomothetic
• from the Greek meaning ‘law’
• sees traits as universal
• comparison among individuals is possible
• individuality reflected in unique combinations of traits
❖Idiographic
• sees traits as idiosyncratic, not universal
• not all traits are shared
• traits may differ in connotation and importance
among people
• comparisons may be not be possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Empirical approach

A
  • demonstrated by Raymond Cattell
  • language has evolved to describe the basic qualities of human nature
  • factor analysed 171 trait names
  • resulted in 16 primary factors of personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Factor analysis

A

Statistical technique for decomposing large numbers of
intercorrelations into basic underlying dimensions
❖patterns of commonality (covariance) between
descriptors indicate underlying traits
❖results of factor analysis can shed light on the structure of personality
CAVEAT: What you get out of a factor analysis
depends on what you put into it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Steps in a factor analysis

A
❖collect measurements on many variables
• self-reports
• observations
❖collect data from many people
❖compute correlations between all pairs of variables
❖extract factors
❖label factors based on factor loadings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theoretical approach 2

A

Hans Eysenck started with a theory about which qualities were useful to measure:
❖conceptually identified 3 ‘types’ or “supertraits”
• Introversion—Extraversion
• Emotionality—Stability
• Psychoticism (least studied)
❖many individual difference variables can be explained in the cross between extraversion and emotionality
❖Eysenck also used the statistical technique of factor
analysis to emphasise measurement & develop a
classification of traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Theory Agreement

A

Trait theorists agree:
i. traits are the fundamental building blocks of human personality
ii. human behaviour & personality can be organised into a hierarchy
e.g., Hans Eysenck suggests behaviour at it’s simplest level consists of specific responses
which link together & form more general habits - grouped together under traits
>. At an even higher level, traits such as sociability, assertiveness & liveliness tend
to co-occur & link as superfactors/supertraits e.g., extraversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Theoretical approach 3

A

Interpersonal Circle:
❖assumes that core traits derive from
those that concern interpersonal functioning
❖two core traits
• dominance (dominant - submissive)
• love (cold-hearted - warm-agreeable)
❖like Eysenck’s view, individual differences arise from combinations of the two dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The big five

A

❖growing evolution of evidence suggests there are five basic superordinate traits
❖disagreement about the exact nature of the 5 traits
WHY?
• factor analysis is used to identify factors
• labeling of factors is subjective
• results depend heavily on the items you start with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EXTRAVERSION (sociability)

A

❖ other labels: social adaptability; assertiveness;
energy
❖ relevant life domain: power
❖ reflected through behavioral and affective channels
❖ common adjectives:
• gregarious • energetic • timid (-)
• outspoken • seclusive (-)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AGREEABLENESS

A

❖ other labels: conformity; friendly compliance;
likeability
❖ relevant life domain: love
❖ reflected through behavioural, affective, and cognitive channels
❖ common adjectives:
• friendly • considerate • spiteful (-)
• kind • cold (-) • good-natured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CONSCIENTIOUSNESS

A

❖ other labels: responsibility; will to achieve
❖ relevant life domain: work
❖ reflected mostly through cognitive channels
❖ common adjectives:
• cautious • planful • frivolous (-)
• serious • careless (-) • hard-working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EMOTIONALITY (neuroticism)

A
❖other labels: emotional control; emotional lability
❖relevant life domain: affect
❖reflected through affective channels
❖common adjectives:
• nervous • anxious • calm (-)
• excitable • composed (-) • high-strung
17
Q

INTELLECT

A

❖other labels: culture; inquiring intellect; openness to
experience
❖relevant life domain: intellect
❖reflected mostly through cognitive channels with
some affect and behavior input
❖common adjectives:
• imaginative • creative • unreflective (-)
• polished • simple (-) • knowledgeable

18
Q

Is behaviour really trait like?

A

• behaviour across contexts tends to vary
• low association between trait self-reports and
behaviour
• Walter Mischel’s personality coefficient (r ≈ .30)
❖Why low correlations?
• faulty trait self-reports of personality
• faulty measurement of behaviour
❖ Aggregation of behavior as solution

19
Q

Responses to low associations: Part 1

A

SITUATIONISM
❖assumption:
• situations really drive behaviour
• differences in personality are irrelevant

20
Q

Responses to low associations: Part 2

A

INTERACTIONISM
❖assumption:
• differences in personality and situations interact to cause behaviour
❖suggests an “analysis of variance” view of
behavior e.g.,
• effect of personality on behaviour “depends
on” strong ‘v’ weak situations

21
Q

Personality’s influence on situations

A

❖Personality influences the situations people choose to
enter (e.g., church, scuba diving, work, marriage partners)
❖People evoke different responses from others
Result: Personality can influence situations such that the situation is actually different

22
Q

Personality coefficient revisited

A

❖when analysis is restricted to examination of carefully
conducted studies, coefficient is somewhat higher
❖size of correlation is limited by the fact that behaviour
is multiply-determined

23
Q

New view of traits

A

❖Personality is linked to behaviour only when in a situation that brings it out
❖Patterns of linkages between situations and actions vary among people
• represent individuality, uniqueness
• differences represent idiographic differences in trait
expression

24
Q

Assessment of personality

A

❖Represents an important focus of the trait
perspective.
❖Mostly self-report in nature
❖Frequently evaluate multiple indicators
❖Often used to create a personality “profile”

25
Q

Disorders of personality

A

❖From the Big 5 perspective generally indicate patterns of behavior that:
• deviate from cultural norms or expectations
• interfere or disrupt person’s life
• interfere or disrupt the lives of others
• are thought of as extreme manifestations of Big 5
❖From the interactionism perspective:
• traits represent vulnerabilities
• disorder relies on a combination of vulnerability and a catalytic situation (diathesis-stress)