TPR_THE NATURAL APPROACH_CLIL Flashcards
TPR-Total Physical Response
TPR-Total Physical Response
TPR - a method of teaching language using physical movement to react to verbal input in order to reduce student inhibitions and lower their affective filter
language associated with a series of simple actions will be easily retained by LLs
Theories behind TPR
Childhood language acquisition theories: children in learning – listening before speaking, listening is accompanied by physical responses (grabbing, reaching, moving, looking …)
The right brain(moving, acting, using metaphors, drawing, pointing) /left brain divide (logical, analyzing, talking, discussing): motor activity is a right-brain function that should precede left-brain language processing
Lowering stress and the affective filter: Ss learn more when they are relaxed, when feeling nervous, affective filter is high – LLs find it harder to understand, process and remember info
TPR characteristics
the instructor is the director of a stage play in which the Ss are the actors“ (1977)
commands: Open the window, Close the door, Stand up, Sit down, Pick up the book, Give it to John.
NO verbal response necessary
more complex syntax: Draw a rectangle on the chalkboard.
interrogatives: Where is the book? (Ss point)
then Ss one by one – responses, asking questions
TPR Advantages
effective in the beginning levels of the language proficiency
easy to implement/no translation (TPR instruction requires no translation or L1 support)
no disadvantage for academically weaker Ss
working well with a mixed ability class, and with students having various disabilities
good for kinesthetic learners
trains Ss to react to language and not think about it too much
reduces pressure and stress for Ss
different style of teaching/learning - keeps students alert
long-term retention
TPR-limits
it is limited since everything cannot be explained with this method, it must be combined with other approaches
it is not a very creative method, Ss are not given the opportunity to express their own views and thoughts in a creative way
far more useful at lower levels
it is easy to overuse TPR
the nature of TPR places an unnaturally heavy emphasis on the use of the imperative mood, that is to say commands such as “Sit down” and “Stand up”
THE NATURAL APPROACH - GENERAL PREMISES
The goal is the ability to communicate with native speakers of the target language
Comprehension precedes production – the Silent Period
Production “emerges“
Acquisition activities are central (dialogues, interviews, personal charts, preference ranking, activating imagination)
Lower the Affective Filter (they won’t learn if their affective barrier is too high)
Speech emerges in stages
Group work encourages speech
Speech emergence is characterized by grammatical errors.
It is NOT based on grammar, it is based on communication
It rejects formal organization of language
It emphasizes comprehensible & meaningful practice activities rather than production of grammatically perfect sentences
It works based on the use of language in communicative situations
aimed at the goal of basic personal communication skills (everyday language situations – conversations, shopping, listening to the radio)
WITHOUT recourse to the native language and WITHOUT reference to grammatical analysis
T – source of the LLs’ input and the creator of an interesting and stimulating variety of classroom activities (games, skits)
advocacy of “silent period“ (delay of oral production) and the emphasis on comprehensible input
THE NATURAL APPROACH
LEARNERS MOVE THROUGH THREE STAGES:
The preproduction stage (the development of listening comprehension skills)
- The early production stage (marked with errors as Ss struggle with the language. T focuses on meaning, not form. Only gross errors that block meaning are corrected)
- Stage of extending production into longer stretches of discourse. Objective is to promote FLUENCY (more complex games, role plays, open-ended dialogues, discussions, small group work)
What is CLIL?
Content and Language Integrated Learning
CLIL (Obsahovo a jazykovo integrované vyučovanie)
this kind of approach has been identified as very important by the European Commission
the concept of CLIL covers all forms of teaching academic, artistic, technical and vocational subjects through the teaching of a language which is not mother tongue for
CLIL versus ESP
ESP: English for Specific Purposes (Business English, Medical English, …)
ESP teaches mainly subject specific VOCABULARY
Focus on language NOT content
Content and language not integrated