Torts Essay Review Flashcards
When will sovereign immunity apply in a torts action
Ca has waived this unless the acts are discretionary political or economic policy decisions performed at the operational level of government
what is the vicarious liability of an employer for acts of their employee called?
respondeat superior
strict liability elements
(1) D is a commercial supplier
(2) D produced or sold a defective product (was defective when it left their control)
(3) defective product was actual and proximate cause of P’s injury
(4) p suffered damages to person or property
products liability based on negligence elements
(1) legal duty
(2) breach due to negligent conduct that lead to the supply of a defective product
(3) the breach was the actual and proximate cause of P’s injury
(4) damage to the P’s person or property
Implied warranty of merchantability
goods are of average quality and are generally fit for the average and ordinary purposes of the product
fitness for a particular purpose
arises when the seller knows that the buyer is buying the goods for a particular purpose and is relying on the seller’s skill and judgement in selecting the goods
Defamation
(1) statement
(2) about the P
(3) publication to a 3rd person
(4) falsity
(5) fault (negligence for private figure; actual malice for public)
(6) damage to P’s reputation
slander; what are slander damages?
spoken defamation; not presumed, must allege special damages or prove pecuniary loss
qualifed priviledge
defense to defamation - one may disparage another’s acts in the course of a critique of matters of public interest / or when recipient has a legitimate interest in the information
***but if privilege is abused, loses it (not within scope / made with malice)
False light
(1) publication of facts that put the P in a false light in the public eye
(2) would be highly offensive to a reasonable person
*If public interest involved, requires actual malice
Intentional infliction of emotional distress
(1) extreme and outrageous conduct
(2) performed with intent or recklessness
(3) to cause P emotional distress
(4) causation
(5) damages (emotional distress must be severe)
false imprisonment
(1) act or omisison by D
(2) that confines P to a bounded area
(3) intent to confine
(4) damages
Conversion
(1) such serious interference with a P’s right of possession in a chattel that warrants the D pay the full vbalue of the chattel
(2) intent to interfere with P’s chattel
(3) causation
what makes an activity abnormally dangerous
(1) must create a foreseeable risk of serious harm even when reasonable care is exercised
(2) activity is not common in the community
strict liability elements when activity is abnormally dangerous
(1) nature of D’s activity imposes duty to make it safe
(2) dangerous nature of activity is the actual and proximate cause of P’s injury
(3) plaintiff suffered damage
comparitive negligence - partial
plaintiff can’t recover if they were over 50% negligent
comparative negligence - pure
P may recover no matter the percentage of their fault
affirmative duty to act
(1) generally no legal duty to affirmatively help others
(2) but if your conduct puts another in peril, you have a duty to use reasonable care to aid or assist the person
(3) additionally, those who invite the public to gather for profit have a duty to use reasonable care to aid or assist their patrons
strict liability - domestic animals? wild animals kept as pets?
No, unless owner knew of dangerous propensities; yes, to an invitee or licensee
What must defamatory statement be to be actionable, generally?
(1) a statement of fact
(2) statement of opinion may be actionable if it appears to be based on specific facts that would be defamation if expressed
(3) the broader the language used, the less likely that it will be reasonably interpreted as a statement of fact or an opinion
how does court determine if defamatory statement is of public or private concern?
Looks to
(1) content
(2) form
(3) context
of the publication
when are special damages not necessary to plead in defamation?
all libel and for slander that falls into a slander per se category, no special damages argument required
child standard of care
normally, of a child of like age, intelligence and experience
*treated as adult if engaging in adult activity