Torts (Delaware) Flashcards
Intentional Torts: Battery - Corporation’s Liability for President’s Conduct
A corporation can be held liable for a battery in conjunction with its president’s tortious conduct.
Intentional Torts: Battery - Self-Defense (Duty to Retreat)
Other than initial aggressors, there is NO DUTY TO RETREAT if one is in their HOME or PLACE OF WORK.
Punitive Damages - When Is This Available? + Medical Malpractice
Punitive damages are available for INTENTIONAL TORTS and RECKLESS, WANTON or WILLFULL conduct.
This INCLUDES medical malpractice from malicious intent or willful or wanton conduct.
Interference with Business or Contractual Relations
To recover for interference with contract, plaintiff must show:
1) there was a CONTRACT,
2) which defendant had KNOWLEDGE of,
3) an INTENTIONAL ACT caused BREACH of contract,
4) with NO JUSTIFICATION, and
5) it caused INJURY.
Negligence: Professional Standard
General practitioners and specialists are held to a NATIONAL standard.
Negligence: Child - Age for Negligence
Children 4.5 years or younger CAN NOT be held negligent.
Negligence: Liability of Parents for Children’s Conduct
Parents are generally NOT vicariously liable for torts of their children, BUT may be held liable for their own negligence when the children cause harm.
Negligence: Statutory Modification - Liability for Negligent Driving by Minor
Adults liable for negligent driving of a minor under 18 IF they signed the license application.
Negligence: Statutory Modification - Automobile Owner for Driver
Vicarious liability is imposed on the owner of a motor vehicle who allows a minor under the age of 18 to drive the vehicle.
Negligence: Statutory Standard of Care (Safety v. Licensing)
Violation of a statute enacted FOR SAFETY of others is negligence per se, BUT licensing statutes are generally NOT considered to set a standard of care and do not violate negligence per se.
Negligence: Causation - Factual Causation Tests in Delaware
1) But-For, and
2) Substantial factor (most typical in WORKERS COMPENSATION)
Negligence: Causation - Proximate Causation
Only foreseeable plaintiffs can recover, foreseeability is a question for the jury.
Negligence: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Elements (Bystander Case)
Plaintiff must show:
1) defendant NEGLIGENTLY CAUSED FRIGHT to the plaintiff,
2) plaintiff was in the ZONE OF DANGER, and
3) the negligently inflicted fright or shock caused PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES.
Medical Malpractice: Res Ipsa Loquitur Cases
Res ipsa loquitur applies by creating a rebuttable presumption in medical malpractice cases where:
1) a foreign object is left in the patient’s body,
2) an explosion or fire originating in a substance used in treatment of the patient occurred in that treatment,
3) surgery is done on the wrong patient or wrong body part.
Medical Malpractice: Affidavit Rule + Exception
Medical malpractice cases generally require AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT signed by medical expert (EXCEPT in res ipsa cases). This affidavit shows defendant BREACHED STANDARD OF CARE and was PROXIMATE CAUSE to harm
Duty of Care Limitations: Continuous Storm Rule
Landowner has NO DUTY to clean ice/snow until a storm has ended.
Duty of Care Limitations: Filed Rate Doctrine
A contract could validly exclude liability for negligence, but the plaintiffs might still be able to recover upon a showing of GROSS NEGLIGENCE or worse.
Duty of Care Limitations: Open and Obvious Conditions
NO DUTY exists to warn of an open and obvious condition such as a depression in a sidewalk.
Defenses: Modified Comparative Negligence
Delaware has adopted modified (partial) comparative negligence. A plaintiff is barred from recovery ONLY IF their fault is MORE THAN 50% of the total fault.
Defenses: Assumption of Risk (Primary v. Secondary)
Primary Assumption of Risk - Plaintiff KNOWINGLY and VOLUNTARILY assumes a risk, which bars duty owed to plaintiff
Secondary Assumption of Risk - Plaintiff’s conduct is UNREASONABLE when they encounter an UNKOWN RISK.
Defenses: Firefighter Rule + Exceptions
An injured firefighter cannot recover against a party whose negligence caused the fire.
Exception:
1) known pre-existing hidden defects with OPPORTUNITY TO WARN,
2) acts occurring AFTER firefighter’s arrival or from perils not related to what makes firefighting dangerous,
3) ARSON.
Defenses: Failure to Wear Seat Belts + Exception
Failure of plaintiff to wear a seat belt in violation of the seat belt statute is INADMISSIBLE on the issues of comparative negligence, EXCEPT for the limited purpose of negligent design