Torts and contracts Flashcards
Traditional (1R) approach to torts
Governed by law of place where last event of tort occurred
This is almost always INJURY
Governmental Interest Analysis: Torts
Courts examine purpose and policies to determine whether parties are truly interested
Conduct-regulating: states have interest when wrongful conduct occurs within territory, causes injury in territory, and injures state resident
Loss-shifting–states have interest when it would BENEFIT resident
Second Restatement Approach: Torts
Apply most significant relationship test with 7 principles
List of contacts:
1) where injury occurred
2) where conduct causing injury occurred
3) domicile/residence/PPOB of parties
4) where relationship of parties is centered
Second Restatement Approach: Torts Presumption
Rebuttable presumption that law of place of injury will apply
Choice of Law: Contracts
Parties are free to choose law that will govern their transaction due to PARTY AUTONOMY (choice of law generally enforceable)
Exception: when is contract choice of law not enforceable?
When validity of contract relies on choice of law (illegal subject matter, incapacity, or absence of formality)
Second Restatement: Contract Validity for choice-of-law
Parties can choose law applying to validity if
1) chosen state has substantial relationship to parties/transaction
2)some other reasonable basis for choice
UNLESS chosen law would be contrary to fundamental policy w most significant relationship to issue
How to treat K with ineffective choice of law provision
Apply general approaches to choice of law
Contract validity: traditional approach to choice of law
Place of CONTRACTING will govern issues of formation/interpretation/validity
Place of contracting = where last act occurred (usually acceptance)
Issues with contract performance: traditional approach
Issues related to performance (manner, sufficiency, excuse) governed by place of performance
Contract Validity: Second Restatement significant relationship test
Determine which state has most significant relationship to K Using guiding principles, including
1) place of negotiation/performance
2) place where subject matter located
3) parties’ domiciles, incorporation
Contract Validity: Second Restatement Presumption
Rebuttable presumption that when place of NEGOTIATION and PERFORMANCE are same, law of that state usually applies