Intro, Domicile, Choice of Law Flashcards
Two ways for person to acquire domicile
1) by choice
2) by law
Establishing domicile by choice
1) must ABANDON previous domicile
2) Establish PHYSICAL PRESENCE in chosen domicile
3) INTENT TO REMAIN indefinitely
Relevant facts: owning real estate, voting, paying taxes, setting up bank account, registering vehicle
Establishing domicile by law
For people who do NOT have capacity to choose their domicile
–Child takes domicile of CUSTODIAL PARENT
–Emancipated minor can CHOOSE domicile
Domicile for corporation
Generally where state is INCORPORATED
But other contacts (e.g. PPOB) can be relevant
When does choice of law exist?
Whenever law of one or more jdx arguably applies to the SAME FACTS
3 approaches to choice of law
1) Traditional approach (First Restatement)
2) Governmental Interest Analysis
3) Most Significant Relationship Approach (Second Restatement)
Discuss all on exam if not specified!
Traditional approach/first restatement choice of law
-TERRITORIAL: states determine legal effects of events within their territory
-when legally significant event occurs, legal right VESTS under the LAWS OF THAT STATE
Rule: Right bests where LAST ACT takes place that provides P with cause of action
Governmental interest analysis
A law applies to set of facts if applications would PROMOTE UNDERLYING PURPOSE of law
If a state law applies, state is INTERESTED in that case
Court should NOT balance INTERESTS of different states
Government Interest: False conflict
When only one state is truly interested, there is false conflict
Court should apply law of INTERESTED state
Government interest: True Conflict
When more than one state is interested
Court should apply law of FORUM STATE
Government interest: unprovided-for case
When neither state is interested, court should apply the law of FORUM STATE
Conduct-regulating laws vs. loss-shifting laws
Conduct-regulating: designed to regulate conduct
Loss-shifting: determine who can or cannot be liable (immunity, vicarious liability, etc.)
When do states have interest in applying conduct-regulating laws?
When wrongful conduct occurs WITHIN THE STATE
Or when state RESIDENT IS INJURED (regardless of where)
When do states have interest in applying loss-shifting laws?
When doing so would BENEFIT state resident
Most significant relationship (2R) analysis rule
Apply the law of the state with most significant relationship to issue in question