Torts Flashcards
Intentional Torts
- Battery
- Assault
- IIED
- False Imprisonment
- Tresspass to Land/Chattel
- Conversion
Battery
- Intent
- Harm/offensive contact
Assault
- Intent
- Cause apprehension or imminent
- Harmful/offensive contact
IIED
- Intent/Reckless
- Extreme/outrageous conduct
- Severe emotional distress
False Imprisonment
- Intent
- Confine
- Bounded Area
- No reasonable means of escape
- P was aware or harmed
Trespass to Land
- Intent
- physical invasion
- P has right to possession
Conversion
- Trespass to Chattel
- Substantial Interference
- P pays full amount
Intentional Tort Defenses
- Consent
- Self-defense
- Defense of Others
- Defense of Property
- Recapture Chattels
Consent
- Express
- Implied
Self Defense
Reasonable Belief
Reasonable Force
Defense of Others
Reasonable belief that other could defend
Reasonable force
Defense of Property
Reasonable force to prevent tort
Recapture Chattels
- In pursuit
- Reasonable force
- Wrongful taking
Negligence
defendant’s conduct causes unreasonable risk to another which results in injury.
Plaintiff must prove: Duty Breach Actual Cause Proximate Cause Actual Damages
Duty/Standard of Care
A person has the duty to act as a reasonable person unless a special duty applies
- Reasonable Person
- Landowners Standard
- Negligence Per Se
Reasonable Person Duty/Standard of Care
A person has the duty to act as a reasonable person to:
- Foreseeable plaintiffs (cordoza)
- Unforseeable plaintiffs = everyone (andrews)
Landowners Duty/Standard of Care
- Licensee = Guests
Duty to warn of known dangerous conditions - Invitee = Business
Duty to make reasonable inspections to find hidden dangers - Trespasser
Even if a person is a trespasser, force that will cause death or serious bodily harm may not be used. Indirect deadly force also cannot be used as a means to protect property.
the landlord should recognize dangers and expected to notice and appreciate reasonable risk conditions of the common area, ex: “sprinkler head could be a hazard
Negligence Per Se Duty/Standard of Care
- defendant violates the statute
- plaintiff within the class the statute was designed to protect
- statute was created to stop that kind of accident
Breach
- Failure to meet standard of care
- violate negligence per se
- Res ipsa loquitur
Actual Cause
But for test. The injury would not have happened but for the act of the defendant or the defendants conduct was a substantial factor in causing the injury
Proximate Cause
- Also called legal cause, it is the direct cause = foreseeability = defendant is liable for all harmful results that were foreseeable
- Eggshell = defendant is liable for unforseen consequences to plaintiff because defendant takes plaintiff as they are
- intervening = defendant is liable for all foreseeable intervening causes (med mal & negligence by rescuer)