Evidence Flashcards
Relevant Evidence
Evidence is relevant if it has a tendency to prove or disprove a material fact
Subsequent Remedial Measures
Evidence of safety measures or repairs after an accident are not admissible excpt to prove. Covers any measures taken, even firing someone after an incident
(1) ownership and cntrol
(2) rebut claim that repairs were not possible
Liability Insurance
Evidence that a person has insurance is not allowed except to prove
- ownership and control
- impeachment
- admission = statement admitting to vfault for injury and mentioning insurance is admissible
Offers to pay medical bills
not admissible. However admissions are admissible but any statements regarding medical expenses is inadmissible
Offers to settle
statements made to settle are not admissible. claim has to be filed already. A disputed claim. Statements not made to pay expenses are admissible.
Offers to plead guilty
Not allowed
Present Recollection Refreshed
Witness showed item to refresh memory and witness then testifies from memory. No hearsay problem since witness ends up testifying from memory
Doctor Patient Privilege
For this exception to apply the information must be necessary for the physician to act for the patient (must be medical) If the statement does not relate to treatment it is not protected by the privilege
Martial Testimony
One spouse cannot be compelled to testify against the other spouse
- spouses have to be currently married
- applies to information before or during marriage
- holder= witness spouse
If the witness and the defendant are married at the time of trial, the witness cannot be placed in contempt for refusing to testify against the defendant regardless if it’s just describing the clothes their spouse was wearing that day. The privilege applies regardless if the testimony would involve confidential communication.
Confidential Martial Privilege
One spouse cannot disclose the confidential communications of the other made during the marriage
- survives marriage
- only covers statements during marriage ., not physical acts
- holder = both spouses. One can prevent the other from testifying
The privilege does not apply if the confidential communication was to aid, plan to commit a crime or fraud. Marital privilege doesn’t apply to fraud actions
Exceptions to privileges
- communications for furtherance of crime or fraud
2. dispute with lawyer
Character
in some cases evidence of a persons character may be offered as evidence when
- character is at issue
- Evidence of how a person probable acted during the events in the case. Defendant can only use opinion and reputation. If character at issue (civil) then defendant can use specific acts
Character Civil Case
Character is not admissible in civil cases unless a person’s character is at issue
- defamation
- negligent entrustment
- wrongful death
If charcter is at issue, all three forms of character evidence is admissible. Opinion, reputation and specific bad acts.
Character Criminal Cases
Defendant can present evidence of his good character traits to try to establish that he acted in conformity with the good character and therefore did not commit the crime.
Defendant can also introduce reputation or opinion evidence of bad character traits of the victim if relevant to show defendants innocence. (self defense)
If defendant opens the door then plaintiff can put their foot in the door and rebut with evidence of bad character. Plaintiff can without using extrinsic evidence
- cross the witness and can ask if witness knew or heard of specific bad acts by the defendant.
- Plaintiff can call their own witnesses to provide reputation or opinion testimony about defendants bad character
Once defendant opens the door by introducing evidence to their good character, the plaintiff may rebut. However,, the plaintiff is constrained in the same manner as the defendant and character must be introduced through reputation or opinion evidence only. no specific acts
Character can be used to prove Mimic
Motive intent mistake identity common scheme or plan
Habit
A regular response to a repeated sitution and is admissible to show conduct in conformity
Impeachment
A witness can be impeached
- Sensory deficiencies
- Bias
- Prior inconsistent statement
- criminal convictions
- Prior Bad Acts
You can impeach a witness because of competency . A witness cant be impeached by a statement in a police report because the police report is not the witness statement
Prior Inconsistent Statement
Can impeach a witness with prior inconsistent statement as long as they have the opportunity to either explain or deny.
- Cant be used as substantive evidence unless made under oath at a prior proceeding.
- Can use extrinsic evidence