Civil Procedure Flashcards
SMJ
SMJ is the courts power to hear a case. In federal court, SMJ is based on either (1) federal question or (2) diversity of citizenship
Federal question = federal law
Diversity = citizens of different states and amount in controversy over $75,000
CA=
Unlimited = over $25k
Limited = over $7500
Small Claims = under $7500
Personal Jurisdiction
Personal jurisdiction is a court’s power to have jurisdiction over the defendant.
The Traditional Basis of PJ
a. consent
b. domicile
c. presence
d. waiver
Long arm statute
In order for a court to have PJ over a defendant who is not a resident of the state, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the forum.
- systematic and continuous presence in the forum state
- purposeful availment
- foreseeable to be hauled into court
- Relatedness
Venue
Venue is proper in any district where
i. claim arose
ii. all defendants reside if all the defendants reside in the same state.
CA = where any defendant resides
Supplemental Jurisdiction
Supplemental jurisdiction brings additional claims into a case that arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original claim. The supplemental claim could not stand in federal court alone.
- common nucleus of operative fact
- same transaction or occurrence
For cases based solely on diversity, plaintiff cannot use supplemental jurisdiction to overcome the diversity requirement but the defendant can through impleader.
Removal/Remand
Removal = A defendant is allowed to remove a case to federal court if case could have been brought in either state or federal court. In diversity cases, the defendant may not remove to federal court if he is a citizen of the forum state The defendant must remove no later than 30 days after the 1st document is served. but never later than one year.
Remand = when removal of a case to federal court is improper, the plaintiff can request the case be remanded back to state court. must remand within 30 days or removal. No time limit if federal court doesn’t have SMJ.
Certain actions are not removable. A workers comp case cannot be removed to federal court, or VAWA, and railroad cases. ‘
Notice of removal must be filed in the federal district of the district state court where the action is pending. Ex: if State B has northern and southern district or state B, and the case was brought in northern district of state b, removal must be in the northern district of state B as well..
Erie Doctrine
Federal court hearing a diversity claim must apply state substantive law to state law claims because the federal court has no authority to create law for the states. For procedural matters, federal court must use federal procedural law and they take precedence over contrary state law.
federal law alone governs and no erie problem if they are in court over a federal problem. If the court is not sitting in diversity and is exercising federal question jurisdiction, federal law will apply and there is no need to examine applicable state law.
Response - Rule 12 and 12b defenses
A defendant must respond by motion or an answer within 21 days after service of process
Lack of PJ = 1st time or waived
Improper Venue = 1st time or waived
Insufficient Service of Process = 1st time or waived
Failure to State a claim = any time until trial is over
Lack of SMJ = never waived
Amended Pleadings
A plaintiff has the right to amend once before the defendant responds. More than once needs consent from other party or leave of the court. Regardless if the other party has responded to a pleading a party can only amend once.
A defendnat has the right to amend once within 21 days of serving his answer
Impleader
A defendant can add a 3rd party defendant in order to seek indemnity or contribution. Supplemental jurisdiction will apply
Interpleader
A property holder forces all people who claim the property into a single lawsuit to avoid multiple suits. There are two types of interpleader, (1)statutory and (2) rule 22 interpleader. Interpleader allows for nationwide service of process.
Statutory Interpleader = requires only one claimant be diverse from one other claimant and the amount in controversy be over $500.
Rule 22 Interpleader =Property holder be diverse from every claimant and the amount in controversy be over $75,000
Statutory Interpleader
requires that one of the claimant be diverse from one other claimant and the amount in controversy be over $500. Nationwide personal jurisdiction and venue is proper where any claimant resides.
Rule 22 Interpleader
Property holder be diverse from every claimant and the amount in controversy be over $75,000
Compulsory Counterclaim
Compulsory counterclaims arise from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim and must be raised in the current case or waived. Cross claims are not compulsory.
Permissive counterclaim
permissive counterclaims do not arise from the same transaction or occurrence and may be raised in the pending case or in a separate case
-no supplemental jurisdiction. This claim must have SMJ on its own
Cross Claim
Cross claims against another defendant must arise from the same transaction or occurrence. Cross claims are never compulsory.
However, once a party has filed a cross claim, he may join with it ANY other claim that he has against the same party
EX: Defendant contract claim is unrelated to plaintiff’s negligence claim, however, defendants negligence cross claim is related to the plaintiffs cross claim therefore the contract claim can be asserted as well.
Mandatory Disclosures
- Initial Disclosures
identify people with discoverable information about the claim or defense. - Expert Information if they are using the expert at trial
- Pretrial Disclosures (a list of witnesses, documents and exhibits
Physical or mental examination of a party
A court will order a physical or mental exam of a party’s physical or mental condition if at issue when there is a showing of GOOD CAUSE
Summary Judgement
No genuine issue of material fact and entitled to judgement as a matter of law. A motion for summary judgement is only available within 30 days after the close of all discovery. An affidavit based on personal knowledge can be used to support or oppose a motion for summary judgment
Judgment as a matter of law
If the court finds that no reasonable jury would have sufficient bases to find for the nonmoving party.