Torts Flashcards
Elements if an Intentional Tort
- Voluntary Act
- Intent
- Causation
Types of intent
- Specific - acts with the purpose of causing the consequence
- General intent - actors knows the consequence is substantially certain to occur
- Transferred intent
When can you transfer intent
When D indents to commit tort against one person but instead commits:
- A different intentional tort against the SAME person
- The same intentional tort against a different person
- A different intentional tort against a different person
What intentional torts does the doctrine of transferred intent apply to?
Assault battery false imprisonment trespass to land trespass to chattel
What are the elements of the intentional tort of BATTERY?
When D:
1. Causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
2. Harmful or offensive contact to P’s person
3. Has specific or general intent
E.g. kicking cane out from under them
What is harmful contact?
It causes injury, pain or illness
What is offensive contact?
When a person of ordinary sensibility would find the contact offensive
What are the elements of the intentional tort of ASSAULT
When D:
- Causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
- Reasonable apprehension in P
- Of imminent harmful or offensive bodily contact to P AND
- Has specific or general intent
Is bodily contact required for an assault?
No
Must P be aware of the D’s actions in an assault?
Yes, in order to have reasonable apprehension. Unlike battery, where you can be unconscious
Are threats of future hard sufficient for an assault?
No, must be imminent
What are the elements of the intentional tort of FALSE IMPRISONMENT?
When D:
- Causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
- Confinement of P within fixed boundaries AND
- Specific or general intent
* P must be aware or harmed by confinement
How can you tell if here is confinement within fixed boundaries?
Exists when P’s movement is limited in all directions, such that there is no reasonable means of escape known to P
How can D cause confinement for purposes of a false imprisonment analysis?
Physical barriers, force, threats, invalid use of authority, duress or failure to provide a safe means of escape
What is the shopkeeper’s privilege?
A shopkeeper can detain a suspected shoplifter so long as the detainment is reasonable in both time and manner
In Florida, also applies to farmers and mass transit agents
What are the elements of the intentional tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
When D:
- Acts with extreme or outrageous conduct;
- Which causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
- SEVERE emotional distress AND
- Has intent to cause severe emotional distress or acts with recklessness
- Damages - although in Fla physical impact or physical manifestation of psychological trauma is not necessary
Can a bystander claim Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?
Needs to show:
(i) present at the time injury occurred to the other person; (ii) close relative of injured
person; and (iii) ∆ knew they were present and a close relative;
Does transferred intent apply to Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
No, but unlike other intentional torts, reckless conduct will suffice
What are the elements of the intentional tort of Trespass to Land
When D:
- Causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
- A physical invasion of P’s real property AND
- Has specific or general intent
Does the invasion have to be by a person for Trespass to Land to be actionable
No, it can be by a person or object, e.g., throwing a rock
Is mistake a defense to Trespass to Land (e.g., D thought the land belonged to him
No
What does D have to intend to do for trespass to land?
D need only intend to enter the land or cause the physical invasion
What are the elements of the intentional tort of Trespass to Chattels?
When D:
- Causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
- an interference with the P’s right of POSSESSION in chattel AND
- Has specific or general intent
E.g. accidentally taking Bob’s computer from the coffee shop thinking it was your own. Bob would need to prove harm to himself or laptop from the taking - -and can only collect to the extent of the damage done, not full value.
What is interference by Intermeddling?
occurs when the D directly damages the chattel
What is interference by Dispossession?
Dispossession occurs when D deprives the P of his lawful right of possession in the chattel
What are the elements of the intentional tort of Conversion
When D:
- Causes or is the substantial factor in bringing about
- an interference with the P’s right of POSSESSION in chattel AND
- The interference is so serious it deprives P entirely of the use of the chattel (and justifies paying full value for the property)
- Has specific or general intent
Is mistake of ownership a defense to trespass to chattels?
No, you only need to intend to keep the chattel.
What are the defenses to intentional torts?
- Consent
- Self defense and defense of others
- Necessity
Defense of consent
Consent is a defense provided that:
- Consent was VALID (no fraud, incapacity) AND
- D’s conduct remained in boundaries of consent
* consent can be express or implied
Self defense and defense of others in Florida
A person who is not engaged in criminal activity and in any place where she has the right to be has NO DUTY TO RETREAT.
She has the right to use such force as she reasonably believes necessary to defend herself or another
When are you justified in using deadly force?
If she reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent death of great bodily harm to herself or another, OR to prevent commission of a forcible felony, she has the right to use or threaten to use FORCE including DEADLY FORCE
When are you presumed to have a reasonable belief of fear of death or great bodily harm?
- Unlawful entry by intruder into another’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, OR the attempted
forcible removal of another from a dwelling, residence, or vehicle, and - The person who used the force must know (or had reason to know) of the unlawful or forcible entry
What is a dwelling?
Dwelling = broader than residence - can be tent, front porch, etc.
When does the reasonable belief PRESUMPTION not apply?
- Person against whom force was used had a legal right to be in the dwelling, residence or vehicle
- Person against whom force was used is attempting to forcibly remove someone over whom they have lawful custody, or is child or grandchild
- Unlawful activity in the dwelling, residence or vehicle by person using force
- Law Enforcement Officer Exception : person against whom force is used is a LEO and person using force knew or reasonably should have known
In Florida, what type of force is permitted in Defense of PRoperty
May use force (not deadly force) based on reasonable belief that such conduct is necessary to prevent tortuous or criminal interference with property.
Deadly force IS NOT JUSTIFIED absent a reasonable belief that deadly force is necessary to prevent a forcible felony.
Defense of Necessity
D enters P’s land or interferes with P’s property to prevent an injury or some other severe harm
What is a private necessity, and who pays for damages?
A necessity defense is private when the D’s act is done to benefit a limited number of people.
D MUST PAY actual damages that he caused
Can landowner use force to exclude D where there is a private necessity?
No, however, landowner can use reasonable force to exclude a trespasser
What is a public necessity, and who pays for damages?
Act is done for public good; D is NOT LIABLE for property damage that he caused.
Elements of Intentional Interference with Business Relations
In Florida, requires:
1. An EXISTING business relationship evidenced by an actual identifiable agreement that in all probability would have been completed absent interference.
2. ∆ knew of the relationship,
3. intentional interference by ∆ induces breach or termination of the relationship or
expectancy AND
4. damages to π (i.e. money lost).
No COA where relationship is based on speculation regarding future sales to past customers
Elements of a COA for negligence
- Duty to conform to a specific standard of care
- Breach
- Actual and proximate case
- Actual damages
To whom is a duty owed?
Forseeable plaintiffs
When is there an affirmative duty to act?
SAID
- special relationship
- administer aid/attempt to rescue
- imposed by law
- conduct of D places plaintiff in Danger
What is the standard of care owed
Reasonably prudent person under the circumstances as measured by an objective standard
D presumed to have average mental abilities and knowledge
Can particular physical disabilities be taken into account?
Yes. E.g., blind person, standard of care of a blind person.
Are intoxicated people held to the same standard as sober people?
Yes, unless the intoxication was not voluntary
Are community customs relevant in determining reasonableness?
Yes, they may be relevant but they are not dispositive
Standard of care for children
Reasonably prudent child of similar age, UNLESS
child is engaged in an adult activity, then held to adult standard
Standard of care for professionals
A professional is expected to exhibit the knowledge and skill of a member of the profession in good standing in similar communities
Standard of care for physicians
what is recognized as acceptable by reasonably prudent similar healthcare providers in light of all relevant circumstances
Standard for informed consent
Health care provider will not be liable for failure to obtain informed consent if the patient either:
- received enough information so that a reasonable person would have a general understanding of the procedure, its alternatives and its risks OR
- would have accepted the treatment had he been advised as required
When is informed consent presumed?
Informed consent is presumed if the doctor gets consent:
(1) In writing;
(2) Signed by patient/HCS; and
(3) Provides information about nature of risks, procedure, reasonable alternatives
Action for prenatal injuries
Both parent and child have action for prenatal injuries if child is born alive. If fetus dies from injuries, parents may bring a negligent stillbirth action for mental pain ad anguish, and medical expenses incident to pregnancy. Cannot bring wrongful death action
In Florida, do COMMERCIAL landowners owe a duty to to protect those OFF the premises?
For both artificial and natural conditions, commercial landowner duty to injuries to plaintiff off the premises is evaluated under regular negligence standard.
What affirmative duty do commercial landowners owe?
Duty to prevent foliage from obstructing view of sidewalk when entering and exiting property.
N/a to residential landowners s/l/a they do not permit foliage or other conditions of land to extend beyond their boundaries.
Duty owed to DISCOVERED Trespassers
Trespassers – lowest level of duty
Duty to warn of dangerous conditions that are known but not readily observable to others.
OTHERWISE, no liability unless
- gross negligence
- intentional misconduct
What is a discovered trespasser?
A person who enters property without an express or implied invitation and whose actual presence is discovered in the 24 hours preceding the accident
If discovered trespasser is legally under the influence of drugs or alcohol, does landowner have a duty to them?
No duty to warn.
But is still liable for gross negligence or intentional misconduct.
Duty to undiscovered trespassor
No duty unless intentional misconduct
What is a licensee?
A person who lawfully enters the premises without invitation for their own benefit, not for the landowner’s benefit
Eg. stop in supermarket to use bathroom
-stop at gas station to get change
Duty to licensee
SAME AS DISCOVERED TRESPASSER
Duty to warn of dangerous conditions that are known but not readily observable to others.
OTHERWISE, no liability unless
- gross negligence
- intentional misconduct
What are the two types of invitee?
Public invitee - invited to enter and remain on premises as a member of the public for the purpose for which the premises are held open to the public
Business invitee - is a person who is invited to enter or remain on premises for a purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealings with the possessor of the premises