Torts Flashcards
Topics? (4)
(Intentional Torts)
- Elements of Prima Facie Case
- Intentional Torts to the Person
- Intentional Torts to Property
- Defenses to Intentional Torts
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Elements of a Prima Facie Case)
- Act by Defendant
- Intent
- Specific, OR
- General
- Transferred Intent
- Assault
- Battery
- False Imprisonment
- Trespass to Chattels
- Trespass to Land
- Causation
Torts? (4)
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to the Person)
- Battery
- Assault
- False Imprisonment
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to the Person: Battery)
- Elements
- Intentional Infliction
- Specific
- General
- Contact
- Indirect Contact
- Harmful or Offensive
- Reasonable Personal Standard
- Offensive = Lack of Consent from Reasonable Person
- Implied Consent for Ordinary Contacts of Everyday Life
- Offensive = Lack of Consent from Reasonable Person
- Reasonable Personal Standard
- To Plaintiff’s Person
- Causation
- Intentional Infliction
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- __
- _
- _
- _
- _
- __
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to the Person: Assault)
- Elements
- Intentional Act by Defendant
- Intent to Create Apprehension (aka Intent to Commit Assault), OR
- Intent to Make Harmful or Offensive Contact (aka Intent to Commit Battery)
- Reasonable Apprehension of Imminent Battery
- Apprehension = Knowledge Not Fear
- Measured From Victim’s Perspective
- Imminent Battery
- Harmful or Offensive Contact
- With Plaintiff’s Person
- Apprehension = Knowledge Not Fear
- Causation
- Intentional Act by Defendant
- Words
- Words Alone = Not Sufficient
- Ability to Negate Apprehension
- Future Threats
- Conditional Threats Sufficient
- Legal Right to Compel the Action, OR
- Condition Expressly Negates Intent
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to the Person: False Imprisonment)
- Elements
- Intentional Act or Omission
- That Confines or Restrains Plaintiff to Bounded Area
- Bounded Area?
- Plaintiff Has Knowledge Of or Harmed by Confinement
- Causation
- Means Sufficient for False Imprisonment
- Physical Force
- Physical Barriers
- Threat of Force
- Failure to Release
- Invalid Assertion of Legal Authority
- Future Threats or Moral Pressure = Not Sufficient
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to the Person: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
- Elements
- Intentional or Reckless Infliction
- Specific Intent
- General Intent, OR
- Reckless
- Severe Emotional or Mental Distress
- Severe?
- By Extreme & Outrageous Conduct
- Factors Considered
- Pattern of Conduct
- Defendant Owed Victim Fiduciary Duty
- Employer-Employee Relationship
- Doctor-Patient Relationship
- Common Carrier or Inn Keeper = High Courtesy to Customers
- Use of Racial Epithets
- Vulnerable Victims
- Young Children
- Elderly
- Pregnant Women
- Supersensitive Victims if Sensitivity Know to Defendant
- Not Extreme & Outrageous Conduct
- Factors Considered
- Actual Damages
- Causation
- Intentional or Reckless Infliction
- Harm to Third Parties
- Prima Facie Case, OR
- Immediate Family Member Plaintiff
- Plaintiff Was Present When Injury Occurred
- Plaintiff = Close Relative of Victim
- Defendant Aware of Both
Torts? (3)
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to Property)
- Trespass to Land
- Trespass to Chattels (Personal Property)
- Conversion
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to Property: Trespass to Land)
- Elements
- Wrongful Physical Invasion
- Of Plaintiff’s Real Property
- Airspace
- Reasonable Distance?
- Subterraneous Space
- Reasonable Distance?
- Airspace
- Intent
- Causation
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to Property: Trespass to Chattels (Personal Property))
- Elements
- Intent
- Interference with a Person’s Right of Possession in Chattel
- Intermeddling = Physical Contact Damages Chattel, OR
- Dispossession = Deprivation of the Lawful Right to Possession of Chattel
- Causation
- Damages
- Remedy = Damages
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Intentional Torts to Property: Conversion)
- Elements
- Intent
- Substantial Interference with Plaintiff’s Right of Possession
- So Severe That Defendant justly Required to Pay Full Value of Chattel
- Factors Distinguishing Conversion from Trespass to Chattels
- Duration
- Good or Bad Faith
- Harm to Property
- Inconvenience to Victim
- Factors Distinguishing Conversion from Trespass to Chattels
- Causation
- Remedies
- Damages = FMV at Time of Conversion
- Possession = Replevin
Topics? (10)
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts)
- Consent
- Self-Defense
- Self-Defense of Others
- Defense of Property
- Recapture of Chattels
- Reentry onto Land
- Necessity
- Shopkeeper’s Privilege
- Privilege of Arrest
- Legal Incapacity = NO DEFENSE
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Consent)
- Express Consent
- Exceptions
- Fraud
- Duress, OR
- Mistake
- Exceptions
- Implied Consent
- Apparent Consent
- Plaintiff’s Conduct = Objective Manifestations
- Custom & Usage
- Consent from Circumstances = Consent Implied by Law
- Apparent Consent
- Legal Capacity Required for Valid Consent
- Exceeding Scope of Consent = Defendant Liable
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Self-Defense)
- Reasonable Belief of a Genuine Threat
- Reasonable Mistake OK
- Imminence Requirement
- Degree of Force
- Non-Deadly Force
- Deadly Force = Imminent Threat of Death or Serious Bodily Harm
- Duty to Retreat
- Restatement View
- Non-Deadly Force = No Duty to Retreat
- Deadly Force = Yes if Safe Unless Actor Inside Her Home
- Restatement View
- Accidental 3rd Party Injuries
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Self-Defense of Others)
- Requires Reasonable Belief
- Reasonable Mistake OK
- Degree of Force = Alter Ego Theory
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Defense of Property)
- Warning Required
- Deadly Force Prohibited
- Exception: Imminent Threat of Death or Serious Bodily Harm
- Deadly Mechanical Devices Prohibited
- Reasonable Mistake
- Intrusion = Yes
- Warning Required = Yes
- Privilege = No
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Recapture of Chattels)
- Fresh Pursuit = Without Unreasonable Delay
- Timely Demand Required Unless Futile or Dangerous
- Reasonable Force But Not Deadly Force
- Wrongful Taking
- Wrongdoer Only
Structure?
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Reentry onto Land)
- Common Law = Yes
- Modern Law = No
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Necessity)
- Public Necessity
- Result = No Compensation for Damages Must Be Paid
- Private Necessity
- Owner May Not Resist During Emergency
- Result
- Nominal or Punitive Damages = Complete Defense
- Actual Damages = Must Pay Damages for Injuries Caused
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Shopkeeper’s Privilege)
- Reasonable Belief
- Reasonable Manner
- Reasonable Period of Time
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Intentional Torts: Defenses to Intentional Torts: Privilege of Arrest)
- With Warrant
- Without Warrant
- Felony Arrest
- Police Officer
- Requirement for Privilege
- Reasonable Belief Felony Has Been Committed
- Reasonable Belief Suspect Committed the Felony
- Force Permitted = Reasonable Force Necessary to Make Arrest
- Deadly Force = Suspect Poses Serious Threat
- Requirement for Privilege
- Private Citizen
- Requirement for Privilege
- Felony Actually Committed
- Reasonable Belief Suspect Committed the Felony
- Force Permitted = Reasonable Force Necessary to Make Arrest
- Deadly Force = Suspect Poses Serious Threat
- Requirement for Privilege
- Police Officer
- Misdemeanor Arrests
- Requirements for Privilege
- Breach of Peace
- Committed in Arresting Party’s Presence
- Force Permitted = Reasonable Force But No Deadly Force
- Requirements for Privilege
- Felony Arrest
First two levels?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence)
- Elements for Prima Facie Case
- Duty of Care
- Breach
- Causation
- Actual Damages
- Defenses
- Contributory Negligence = Complete Bar
- Comparative Negligence = Reduction of Recovery
- Assumption of the Risk
Topics? (5)
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Duty of Care)
- Foreseeable Victims
- Basic Standard of Care = Reasonable Person Acting Under Similar Circumstance
- Duty of Owner & Occupiers of Land
- Legal Duty to Act
- Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Duty of Care: Foreseeable Victims)
- Majority View = Foreseeable Zone of Danger
- Minority View = Everyone is Foreseeable
- Specific Situations
- Rescuers
- Prenatal Injuries
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Duty of Care: Basic Standard of Care = Reasonable Person Acting Under Similar Circumstance)
- Objective Standard of Care
- Physical Disability = Yes
- Mentality Characteristics = No
- Intoxication = No
- Children (Between 4- 18 Years) = Subjective Test
- Exceptions
- Adult Activities
- Children < 4 Years Old = Incapable of Negligence
- Exceptions
- Custom = Admissible But Not Conclusive
- Emergencies = Yes
- Superior Knowledge
- Standard of Care for Professionals = Community Standard
- Standard of Care for Medical Specialists = National Standard of Care
- Duty to Disclose Risk of Treatment
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Duty of Care: Duty of Owner & Occupiers of Land)
- To Those Off Premises
- Natural Conditions on Premises = No Duty to Protect
- Unreasonable Dangerous Artificial Conditions = Reasonable Care
- Activities on Property = Reasonable Care
- To Those On Premises
- Licensees (aka Social Guests)
- Activities = Reasonable Care
- Unknown Concealed Dangers = No Duty to Inspect
- Known Concealed Dangers = Duty to Warn
- Invitees
- Activities = Reasonable Care
- Unknown Concealed Dangers = Duty to Inspect with Reasonable Care
- Known Concealed Dangers = Duty to Warn
- Undiscovered Trespassers = No Duty of Care
- Discovered Trespassers = Reasonable Care
- Activities = Reasonable Care
- Dangerous Condition on Land = Duty to Warn or Make Safe
- Artificial Condition
- Highly Dangerous
- Hidden Condition
- Known to Landowner
- Children
- Activities = Reasonable Care
- Natural Conditions = No Duty Unless Licensee or Invitee
- Artificial Conditions & the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine
- Dangerous Artificial Condition That Owner Is or Should Be Aware Of
- Owner Knows or Should Know Children Likely to Trespass
- Condition Likely to Cause Injury
- Children Unaware of the Danger
- Risk to Children Substantially Outweighs Expense of Eliminating Danger
- Owner Failed to Exercise Reasonable Care
- Firefighters & Other Public-Safety Personnel
- Licensees (aka Social Guests)
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Duty of Care: Legal Duty to Act)
- Exceptions
- Voluntary Assumption of Care = Reasonable Care
- Creation of Peril = Duty to Assist
- Pre-existing Relationship Between Parties
- Familial Relationship
- Parent-Child
- Spousal Relationship
- Common Carriers = Duty to Customers
- Innkeepers = Duty to Guests
- Shopkeepers = Duty to Customers
- Prison Officers = Duty to Prisoners
- Familial Relationship
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Duty of Care: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress)
- Duty Breached?
- Threat of Physical Impact Leads to Emotional Distress, OR
- Zone of Physical Danger
- Directly Causes Severe Emotional Distress Likely to Result in Physical Consequences
- Threat of Physical Impact Leads to Emotional Distress, OR
- Physical Consequences Required
- Exceptions
- Erroneous Report of Relative’s Death, OR
- Mishandling of a Relative’s Corpse
- Exceptions
- Bystander’s Fear for Others’ Safety
- Requirements
- Plaintiff Present At Scene
- Plaintiff Observed or Perceived the Injury
- Plaintiff & Injured Party Are Closely Related
- Requirements
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Breach)
- Violation of Statute (aka Negligence Per Se)
- Statute Must Apply to the Facts
- Class of Persons Protected by Statute
- Protection Against Particular Harm
- Unexcused Violation of Safety Statute = Negligence Per Se
- Compliance Establish Due Care
- Excused Violations
- Compliance Would Cause More Harm Than Violation
- Compliance Beyond Defendant’s Control
- Statute Must Apply to the Facts
- Res Ipsa Loquitur
- Requirements
- No Direct Evidence
- Accident Normally Does Not Occur Without Negligence By Someone
- Instrument within Defendant’s Exclusive Control
- Result of Doctrine
- Requirements
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Causation)
- Cause in Fact
- But For Test
- Concurrent Causes = Substantial Factor Test
- Both Substantial Factors = Joint Liability
- Alternative Causes
- Proximate Cause
- Foreseeability
- Foresight Approach
- Identify Defendant’s Negligence
- Within the Risk Foreseen?
- Foresight Approach
- Direct Cause (Unbroken Chain)
- Indirect Cause
- Foreseeable (“Dependent”) Events
- Medical Malpractice
- Negligence of Rescuers
- Reactions to Defendant’s Actions
- Subsequent Disease
- Subsequent Accident
- Unforeseeable (“Independent”) Events
- Negligent Acts of 3rd Parties
- Crimes & Intentional Torts of 3rd Parties
- Acts of God
- Foreseeable (“Dependent”) Events
- Foreseeability
Sructure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Elements for Prima Facie Case: Actual Damages)
- Personal Injury (Thin Skulled Victims)
- Property Damage
- Punitive Damages
- Duty to Mitigate
- Collateral Source Rule
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Negligence: Defenses)
- Contributory Negligence = Complete Bar
- Last Clear Chance Doctrine
- Not a Defense to Intentional Torts
- Comparative Negligence = Reduction of Recovery
- Partial Comparative Negligence
- Pure Comparative Negligence
- Assumption of the Risk-
- Implied Assumption of Risk
- Express Assumption of Risk
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Strict Liability)
- Animals
- Trespassing Animals = Strictly Liable for Reasonably Foreseeable Damage
- Non-trespassing Animals
- Wild Animals = Strictly Liable
- Dangerous Propensity Limitation
- Domestic Animals = No Strict Liability
- Exception: Owner Knows or Has Reason to Know Animal is Dangerous
- Wild Animals = Strictly Liable
- Abnormally Dangerous Activities
- Factors for Determining Abnormally Dangerous
- High Degree of Risk
- Of Serious Harm
- Risk Cannot Be Eliminated
- Activity Not Common
- Activity Not Appropriate for Place
- Danger Outweighs Value
- Factors for Determining Abnormally Dangerous
- Defenses = Assumption of Risk & Comparative Negligence
Topics? (5)
(Products Liability)
- Elements for Strict Products Liability
- Proving a Defect
- Defenses
- Implied Warranties
- Representation Theories
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Products Liability: Elements for Strict Products Liability)
- Merchant
- Non-Merchants
- Casual Sellers
- Service Providers
- Non-Manufacturers Liable if Merchants in Distribution Chain
- Non-Merchants
- Defect in Product
- Manufacturing Defect = Lemon
- Design Defect = Design Generally Defective
- Duty to Warn = Properly Manufactured & Designed Products
- Actual Cause = Defect Existed in Hands of Manufacturer
- Presumed if Ordinary Channels of Commerce
- Res Ipsa Loquitur
- Of the Kind that Ordinarily Occurs As a Result of a Product Defect
- Not Solely the Result of Other Causes
- Intended Use or Reasonably Foreseeable Misuse
- Foreseeable = Reasonable Design Precautions or Warning
- Privity Not Required
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Products Liability: Proving a Defect)
- Manufacturing Defect = Product Failed to Perform as Safely as Ordinary Consumer Would Expect
- Design Defect
- Feasibility of Alternative Design
- Financial Cost of Alternative Design
- Adverse Consequences to Product & Consumer of Alternative Design
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Products Liability: Other Considerations)
- Safety Standards
- Noncompliance = Defective Product
- Compliance = Evidence But Not Conclusive
- Scientifically Unknowable Risks
- Unavoidably Unsafe Products
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Products Liability: Defenses)
- Comparative Negligence = Yes
- Contributory Negligence = No
- Assumption of Risk
- Disclaimers & Waivers Ineffective
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Products Liability: Implied Warranties)
- Implied Warranty of Merchantability
- More Limited Definition of Merchant
- Implied Warranties of Merchantability Can Be Disclaimed If
- General Language of Disclaimer & Conspicuous
- “As Is” or “With All Faults”
- Limitation of Remedies = OK Unless Unconscionable
- Personal Injury = Prima Facie Unconscionable
- Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose
- Who Can Sue?
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Products Liability: Representation Theories)
- Express Warranty of Quality
- Statements of Opinion
- Express Warranties Generally Cannot Be Disclaimed
- Misrepresentation of Material Fact
- Misrepresentation of Material Fact
- Seller Intended to Induce Reliance
Topics? (3)
(Defamation)
- Common Law Elements
- 1st Amendment Privilege (aka Constitutional Requirements)
- Defenses
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Defamation: Common Law Elements)
- Defamatory Statement
- Character Traits
- Honesty
- Peacefulness
- Loyalty
- Morality
- Insults = Not Defamatory
- Character Traits
- Reference to Plaintiff
- Plaintiff Must Be Alive
- Publication by Defendant to 3rd Person
- Intentional, OR
- Negligent
- Damages to Plaintiff’s Reputation
- Libel = Damages Not Necessary
- Damages Presumed
- Slander
- Slander Per Se = Damages Not Necessary
- Crimes of Moral Turpitude
- Loathsome Disease
- Sexual Misconduct
- Adversely Reflects on One’s Conduct in Business, Profession, Trade, or Office
- Not Slander Per Se = Must Prove Special Damage
- Slander Per Se = Damages Not Necessary
- Libel = Damages Not Necessary
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Defamation: 1st Amendment Privilege (aka Constitutional Requirements))
- Types of Defamation with 1st Amendment Issues
- Refers to a Public Figure, OR
- Involves a Matter of Public Concern
- Two Additional Requirements
- Defamation is False
- Burden of Proof = Plaintiff
- Fault By Defendant
- Public Official or Figure = Malice
- Public Figure?
- Malice?
- Knowledge, OR
- Reckless Disregard
- Private Persons = Negligence
- Public Official or Figure = Malice
- Defamation is False
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Defamation: Defenses)
- Consent
- Truth
- Absolute Privilege = Cannot be Lost
- Husband & Wife
- Judicial Proceedings
- Judges
- Lawyers
- Parties
- Witnesses
- Legislative Proceedings
- Government Officials
- Compelled Broadcasts
- Qualified Privilege = Can be Lost if Abuse
- Abuse of Qualified Privilege
- Actual Malice (Lack of Good Faith)
- Excessive Publication
- Made to Persons to Whom Publication Not Reasonable Necessary, OR
- More Damaging Information Than Reasonably Needed
- Categories of Qualified Privilege
- Report of Public Proceedings
- Protection of Publisher’s Interests
- Job References
- Letters of Recommendation
- Protection of Recipient’s Interests
- Job References
- Letters of Recommendation
- Statements in the Public Interest
- Statements Made to the Police
- Abuse of Qualified Privilege
Topics? (2)
(Privacy & Nuisance)
- Invasion of Privacy
- Nuisance
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Privacy & Nuisance: Invasion of Privacy)
- Appropriation
- Elements
- Unauthorized Use of Plaintiff’s Name or Picture
- For Defendant’s Own Benefit
- Exception: Newsworthy Use
- Elements
- Intrusion
- Elements
- Intrusion of Plaintiff’s Solitude
- Must be Private Place
- Highly Offensive to a Reasonable Person
- Intrusion of Plaintiff’s Solitude
- Elements
- Publicity of Private Life
- Elements
- Publication of the Details of Plaintiff’s Private Life
- Highly Offensive to a Reasonable Person of Ordinary Sensibilities
- Exception: Newsworthy Use
- Elements
- False Light
- Elements
- Places Plaintiff Before the Public Eye
- In a False Light
- Highly Offensive to a Reasonable Person Under the Circumstances
- Public Figure = Malice
- Knowledge, OR
- Reckless Disregard
- Elements
- Defenses
- Newsworthy Use
- Appropriation
- False Light
- Consent
- Absolute & Qualified Defamation Privileges
- Publicity of Private Life
- False Light
- Newsworthy Use
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Privacy & Nuisance: Private Nuisance)
- Elements
- Plaintiff Has Interest in Land
- Substantial Inference
- Unreasonable Interference with Use & Enjoyment of Land
- Unreasonableness?
- Harm to Plaintiff > Utility of Defendant’s Conduct, OR
- Harm to Plaintiff Greater Than Required to Bear without Compensation
- Unreasonableness?
- Defendant’s Conduct = Negligent Abnormally Dangerous or Intentional
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Privacy & Nuisance: Nuisance)
- Public Nuisance
- Elements
- Substantial Harm Required
- Injury to the Public at Large
- Recovery by Private Party
- Elements
- Private Nuisance
- Elements
- Plaintiff Has Interest in Land
- Substantial Inference
- Unreasonable Interference with Use & Enjoyment of Land
- Unreasonableness?
- Harm to Plaintiff > Utility of Defendant’s Conduct, OR
- Harm to Plaintiff Greater Than Required to Bear without Compensation
- Unreasonableness?
- Defendant’s Conduct = Negligent Abnormally Dangerous or Intentional
- Elements
- Defenses
- Comparative/Contributory Negligence
- Assumption of Risk (aka “Coming to the Nuisance”)
Topics? (5)
(Extra)
- Vicarious Liability
- Joint Tortfeasors
- Survival of Tort Actions
- Wrongful Death
- Other Miscellaneous Torts
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Extra: Vicarious Liability)
- Respondeat Superior Doctrine = Employer-Employee Relationship
- Intentional Torts
- Exceptions
- Specifically Authorized by Employer
- Nature of Employment
- Motivated by Desire to Serve the Employer
- Exceptions
- Intentional Torts
- Independent Contractors
- Exceptions
- Non-Delegable Duty
- Inherently Dangerous Activity
- Exceptions
- Partners & joint Ventures
- Auto Consent
- Exceptions
- Family Car Doctrine
- Driver Acting On Behalf of Owner
- Negligent Entrustment = Owner Liable for Own Negligence
- Exceptions
- Parents & Children
- Common Law = Not Vicariously Liable
- Modern Law
- Tavern Keepers
- Common Law = No Liability
- Modern Law = Dram shop Acts
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Extra: Joint Tortfeasors)
- Joint & Several Liability
- Satisfaction = Full Payment
- Release
- Contribution
- Contribution Not Available for Intentional Torts
- Indemnity
- Vicarious Liability = Full Indemnity
- Strict Liability = Non-Manufacturer v. Manufacturer
- By Contract
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
(Extra: Survival of Tort Actions)
- Torts Resulting in Personal Injury = Yes
- Torts to Property = Yes
- Torts Invading Intangible Personal Interests = No
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Extra: Wrongful Death)
- Spouses Recovering for Deceased Spouse = Yes
- Parents Recovering for Deceased Child = Yes
- Children Recovering for Deceased Parents = Generally No
- Loss of Consortium Damages
- Loss of Household Services
- Loss of Society
- Loss of Sexual Relationship
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Extra: Other Miscellaneous Torts)
- Misrepresentation
- Intentional Misrepresentation (Fraud or Deceit) Elements
- Misrepresentation of Material Fact
- Scienter
- Knowledge, OR
- Reckless Indifference to the Truth
- Intent to Induce Plaintiff’s Reliance on Misrepresentation
- Justifiable Reliance by Plaintiff
- Causation
- Damages
- Negligent Misrepresentation Elements
- Misrepresentation in Business or Professional Capacity
- Breach of Duty to Plaintiff
- Justifiable Reliance by Plaintiff
- Causation
- Damages
- Intentional Misrepresentation (Fraud or Deceit) Elements
- Interference with Business Relationships
- Elements
- Valid Contract or Business Expectancy
- Knowledge By Defendant of the Business Relationship
- Intentional Interference
- Causation
- Damages
- Elements
- Misuse of Legal Procedure
- Malicious Prosecution
- Elements of Prima Facie Case
- Defendant Initiated Criminal Proceedings Against Plaintiff
- Terminated in Favor of the Plaintiff
- No Probable Cause
- Improper Purpose
- Damages
- Elements of Prima Facie Case
- Wrongful Civil Proceedings
- Abuse of Process
- Elements of Prima Facie Case
- Wrongful Use of Litigation Devices for Ulterior Improper Purpose
- Definite Act or Threat Against Plaintiff to Accomplish Ulterior Improper Purpose
- Elements of Prima Facie Case
- Malicious Prosecution