Professional Responsibility Flashcards
Topics? (2)
(Conflicts of Interest)
- Lawyer-Client Relationship
- Duty of Loyalty
A conflict of interest exists if . . .
an interest of the attorney, another client, past client or a third party materially limits or is adverse to loyal representation
Topics? (17)
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty)
- Resolving Conflicts of Interest
- Past Client Conflicting with Present Client
- Representation of Multiple Clients
- Counseling Client to Act
- Use of Confidential Information to Client’s Disadvantage
- Propriety Interest in Subject Matter of the Litigation
- Business Transactions with Client
- Publication Rights Contract
- Expense Advances & Loans
- Serving in Legal Services Organization
- Former Government Lawyers in Private Practice
- 3rd Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from the Client
- Close Relationship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Resolving Conflicts of Interest)
- Continuing Duty
- ABA Model Rules - actual conflicts only
- Reasonably Believe
- Inform Each Client
- Client Gives Informed Written Consent
- CA Rules - actual and potential conflicts
- No Reasonable Lawyer Standard
- Written Disclosure or Informed Written Consent
- Written Disclosure by Attorney
- Legal, Business. Financial, Professional or Personal Relationship with Party or Witness in Same Matter, OR
- Knows or Reasonably Should Know
- Previous Legal, Business, Financial, Professional or Personal Relationship with Party or Witness in Same Matter
- Previous Relationship Would Substantially Affect
Representation, OR
- Legal, Business, Financial, Professional or Personal Relationship with Person or Entity & Knows or Reasonably Should Know
Would Be Substantially Affected by Resolution of the Matter, OR - Legal, Business, Financial or Professional Interest in Subject
Matter of the Representation
- Informed Written Consent by Client
- Multiple Clients & Interests Potentially Conflict, OR
- Multiple Clients & Interests Actually Conflict
- Written Disclosure by Attorney
- Remedies
- Prior to Acceptance of Representation = Refuse Representation of Client, OR
- Post Acceptance of Representation = Withdraw
ABA Rule?
CA Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Past Client Conflicting with Present Client)
If a reasonable lawyer could conclude that she could undertake the subsequent representation without impact on the lawyer’s ability to diligently represent the new client, and that the representation of the new client will not result in the use of any confidential information obtained in the prior engagement the lawyer may undertake the new engagement so long as both clients are informed and provide consent in writing
No Reasonable Lawyer Standard, but otherwise the same: a member shall not, without the informed written consent of the client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client or former client where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has obtained confidential information material to the employment.
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Past Client Conflicting with Present Client: Imputed Disqualification)
- Former Firm
- Remaining Attorney Has Confidential, Material Information
- Matter are Substantially Related or the Same
- Former Government Client
- Ethical Wal
- No Sharing in Fee
- Government Informed
- Judicial Officers Other Than Attorneys
- Conflict Arises from a Purely Personal Relationship
- Ethical Wall
- CA Rules - CA will disqualify for this, but not subject to disciplinary action
General Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Representation of Multiple Clients)
A lawyer generally must not accept the representation of more than one client if she believes their interests to be materially adverse or that any loyalties or interest might prevent the fair and competent representation of either or both clients. An attorney may represent multiple clients with potential conflicts with the proper consent of all clients but it is almost never proper if the clients’ interests are in actual conflict.
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Representation of Multiple Clients)
- Resolving Conflicts of Interests
- Reasonably Believe No Adverse Effect
- CA Rules - CA does not have this reasonable attorney standard
- Duty to Disclose
- Informed Written Consent
- CA Rules Require Informed Written Consent for Both Potential &
Actual Conflicts
- CA Rules Require Informed Written Consent for Both Potential &
- Reasonably Believe No Adverse Effect
- Opposing Parties in Same Lawsuit or Transaction Prohibited
- Opposing Client’s Interest
- ABA Rules = Not Prohibited but Rarely Reasonable
- CA Rules = Prohibited
- Exception: Policy Holder & Insurance Company as joint Client
- Two Client With Inconsistent Positions
- Criminal Cases
Structure?
- Exceptions
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Propriety Interest in Subject Matter of the Litigation)
- Exceptions
- Lien to Secure Fees or Expenses
- CA Rule - does not allow such liens
- Contract for Reasonable Contingency Fee
- Lien to Secure Fees or Expenses
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Business Transactions with Client)
- Requirements
- Fair & Reasonable Terms
- Fully Disclosed in Understandable Writing
- Independent Legal Counsel
- Written Informed Consent
- Exception: Standard Commercial Transaction
ABA Rule?
CA Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Publication Rights Contract)
no contracts before the end of the representation
discourages contracts before the end of the proceedings but tolerates them if the judge is satisfied that the client clearly understands and consents
ABA Rule?
CA Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Expense Advances & Loans)
No financial assistance to a client in connection with litigation except litigation expenses when representing an indigent client (i.e., pro bono work) or the advance of litigation expenses in contingent fee cases
CA prohibits financial assistance to a client in all contexts and prohibits the promise of paying a prospective client’s debts. However, CA permits lawyers to make such loans for any matter (even non-litigation matters) after the attorney is hired, so long as the payment is actually a loan that must be repaid and not an outright gift. Additionally, the lawyer and client must enter into a written loan agreement, signed by both parties. CA also allows the advancement of litigation expenses in contingent fee cases.
General Rule?
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Serving in Legal Services Organization)
a lawyer may serve as a director, officer or member of a legal services organization, apart from the law firm in which the lawyer practices, notwithstanding that the organization serves persons having interests adverse to a client of the lawyer
- Lawyer Shall Not Knowingly Participate in Decision or Action
- Incompatible with Duty of Loyalty, OR
- Material Adverse Effect
Stucture?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Former Government Lawyers in Private Practice)
- ABA Rules
- Written Consent of Govt. Employer
- Matter
- Regulations Are Not Matters
- CA Rules: Former Prosecutor - CA specifically prohibits a former prosecutor from later working on the defense of the same case
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: 3rd Party Interference)
- Acceptance of Payment from 3rd Party - the ABA Model Rules state that a lawyer should not accept payment from a third party for services to a client, unless the third party does not influence the lawyer’s independent judgment and the client consents after full disclosure
-
Organizational Client
-
Reporting Up & Reporting Out
- ABA Model Rules: when a lawyer working for a business organization discovers misconduct that might damage the organization, the lawyer must report that misconduct up the chain of authority within the organization. The ABA also permits the attorney to report the information to appropriate persons outside the organization if the highest authority within the organization fails to take appropriate action
- CA Rules: reporting within to a higher internal authority is allowed - this is permissive, however, not compulsory. Reporting out is not allowed in any case; however, if the federal law requires or allows an attorney to report, federal preemption means the attorney cannot be held liable for doing so
-
Reporting Up & Reporting Out
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Limiting Malpractice Liability)
- ABA Rules: will allow limits on liability if the client is represented by other independent legal counsel when the agreement was made
- CA Rules: an attorney cannot limit malpractice liability even if the work is pro bono
- Written Advice to Seek Independent Counsel Required for Settlement of Malpractice Suit
ABA Rule?
CA Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Close Relationship with Adversary Attorney)
an attorney may not oppose a party represented by a relative without informed client consent
CA also recognizes a close relationship when the one lawyer is the client of the other lawyer, when two lawyers live together and when two lawyers have an intimate personal relationship
Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Gifts from Client)
an attorney shall not solicit substantial gifts from a client or draft a legal instrument (e.g. will, trust agreement or deed) for a client that will give the lawyer (or a person related to the attorney) a substantial gift unless the lawyer and client are related
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness)
-
ABA Rule: an attorney should not act as an advocate in a trial where the lawyer is likely to be called as a witness
- Exceptions
- Testimony Only Relates to Uncontested Matter
- Testimony Regarding Nature & Value of Legal Services Provided
- Disqualification Would Result in Substantial Hardship to the Client
- Exceptions
- CA Rule: prohibits attorneys from testifying in jury trials unless the client consents in writing, the testimony concerns an uncontested matter or the testimony relates to the nature and value of the legal services provided
ABA Rule?
CA Rule?
(Conflicts of Interest: Duty of Loyalty: Consensual Sexual Relations)
expressly forbid lawyers from engaging in consensual sex with their clients unless there was a preexisting sexual relationship
allows such relations where the lawyer and client are involved in a preexisting sexual relationship AND where the nature of the sexual relationship will not preclude the lawyer from rendering competent legal services
Topics? (3)
(Duty to Preserve Confidentiality of Information)
- Duty of Confidentiality
- Attorney-Client Privilege
- Work Product Doctrine
- Representation of Multiple Clients
Generally?
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Duty to Preserve Confidentiality of Information: Duty of Confidentiality)
the duty of confidentiality requires a lawyer to keep confidential all information provided to the lawyer for the purpose of rendering legal services without the consent of the client
- Scope of Duty
- Source of Information
- Timing of Duty
- Before the Attorney-Client Relationship
- After the Attorney-Client Relationship
- Exceptions
- Consents After Consultation
- CA Rule: consent must be in writing
- Implied Consent
-
Preventing Crimes of Death or Substantial Bodily Harm: an attorney may reveal what is necessary to prevent the act if she reasonably believes disclosure is necessary to prevent a crime likely to result in reasonable certain death or substantial bodily harm
- CA Rule: must first, if reasonable under the circumstances, make a good faith effort to persuade the client not to commit the act and inform your client of your decision to reveal her confidences
- Intent to Commit Fraud That Will Cause Significant Financial Injury
- ABA Rule: a lawyer who is aware that
a client intends to commit fraud that will cause significant financial injury can disclose confidential information to the extent reasonably necessary to avoid. Reporting is allowed only if (a) the lawyer’s services are being used to perpetrate the crime or fraud, and (b) reporting would prevent the financial crime from occurring or mitigate substantial financial loss. - CA Rule: No Financial Exceptions to Confidentiality
- ABA Rule: a lawyer who is aware that
- To Establish a Claim or Defense
- Controversy between Lawyer & Client
- Defense to Criminal Charge or Civil Claim
- Allegations Concerning Lawyer’s Representation of the Client
- Compelled by Law, Final Court Order or Other Controlling Ethical Duties
- Consents After Consultation
Generally, i.e., what kind of privilege is it?
Structure?
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
- _
(Duty to Preserve Confidentiality of Information: Attorney-Client Privilege)
an evidentiary one, i.e., prevents a court from using subpoena power and contempt to compel the revelation of confidential information
- Scope of Privilege
- Timing of Privilege
- ABA Rules = Applies Indefinitely
- CA Rules = Terminates When Estate is Settled
- Exceptions
- Services Used to Commit Future Crime or Fraud
- Allegations Concerning Lawyer’s Representation of the Client
- Litigation Between Former Joint Clients of Lawyer
- Competency or Intention of Client to Dispose Property By Will or Inter Vivos Transfer
- CA Rules: Preventing Crimes of Death or Substantial Bodily Harm