tort of negligence Flashcards

1
Q

what is tort of negligence

A

when someone is careless and it causes someone harm to someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

succeeding in action for negligence (3 elements)

A
  1. defendant owed claimant a duty of care
  2. defendant breached that duty of care
  3. claimant suffered loss or damage as a result of breach of duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how to assess duty of care

A

3 stage test:
1. harm or loss foreseeable
2. relationship of proximity w claimant and defendant?
3. fair just and reaosnable that impose duty on defendant?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is duty of care

A

A legal obligation requiring individuals to act with reasonable care to avoid foreseeable harm to others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

duty of care 1. reasonable foreseeability

A

foreseen a risk of damage?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

duty of care: 2. proximity

A

relationship between defendant and activity harming claimant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

restricted claims using proximity/fair, just reasonable

A
  1. against public bodies
  2. psychiatric injury
  3. economic loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a breach of duty

A

defendant fails to meet standard of care expected under circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the standard of reasonable care

A

what would a ‘reasonable person’ have done in the defendants situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

exceptions to the reasonable person rule

A
  • children: set by reference to age
  • professionals : set by reference to relevant profession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what determines whether defendant has fallen short of reasonable person standard

A

cost benefit analysis,
- would preventing a foreseebale risk of harm have been less costly than letting it happen
if so, defendant probably shouldve defended it
(factors: probability of harm)
(potential seriousness of the damage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

factors relevant to cost benefit analysis of breach of duty

A
  1. probability of harm
  2. potential seriousness of damage
  3. practicality/cost of protection
  4. potential benefits of the risk
  5. common practice in the relevant field
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how to prove breach of duty

A

‘on balance of probablities’
‘ res ipta loquitor’ things speak for itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is causation

A

If claimant can provide breach of duty, court will ask whether breach caused claimants loss/damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 aspects to causation

A

factual causation
legal causation
remoteness of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is factual causation

A

“but for” defendants act, would the claimant have suffered?

17
Q

what is legal causation

A

if factual causation established, court considers whether defendant was legal

18
Q

what is remoteness of damage?

A

must not be too remote
- designed to call a halt to liability at a sensible point
- if claimant has weakness (eg breaks a bone but has brittle/soft bones), liable full extent

19
Q

what are defences?

A

even if able to claim successfully, insuccessful if able to prove defence (3)

20
Q

3 types of defences

A
  1. contributory negligence
  2. consent
  3. illegality
21
Q

what is partial/complete defence

A

reduce extent of defendants liability
extinguish completely defendants liability

22
Q

what is contributory negligence

A

partial defense
defendent needs to establish claimant did not take reasonable care

23
Q

what is consent in defence

A

full defence
‘volenti non fit injura’ no harm is done to one who concents
applied where claimant consented in some way

24
Q

what is illegality in defence

A

person committing crime should not sue for damages if injured in result of doing so

25
Q

what is a pure economic loss

A

financial loss that does not directly result from personal injury or damage to property

26
Q

when is economic loss recoverable/irrecoverable?

A

irrecoverable: caused by negligent act
recoverable: caused by negligent statement/advice

27
Q

what are the hedly bryne principles

A

duty of care not to cause economic loss

28
Q

what are the 4 principles of hedly bryne

A

a. special relations
b. defendant voluntarily assumed a responsibility to claimant
c. claimant relied on defendants advice
d. reasonable for party to have relied on advice

29
Q
A