Company Law Cases Flashcards
Adams v Cape Industries plc
1990: Parent company is not automatically liable for act of its subsidiaries
Ashbury Railway carraige and Iron Co Ltd v Riche
1875: Held that a company cannot undertake activities outside its stated objects in its memorandum of association
Re produce marketing consortium Ltd
1989: directors found liable for wrongful trading as they continued when they knew no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation
Lee v Lee’s air farming Ltd
1961: affirmed company and controlling shareholder are separate legal entities, allowing shareholder to be employee and claim workers compensation
Macaura v Norhtern Assurance Co Ltd
1925: established shareholders have insurable interest in company’s asset, reinforcing separation between company and shareholders ownership
Eclairs Group Ltd v JVK Oil & Gas plc
directors must exercise their powers for proper purposes
Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd
Held that directors must use their powers for proper purposes
mutual life insurance co of new york v Rank Organisation Ltd
Concerned the validity of a company’s decision under its articles of association, emphasising the importance of compliance with corporate governance procedures
re Barings plc
adressed directors duties of care and diligence, holding directors personally liable for faiing to supervise the activities leading to companys collapse
Bhullaar v Bhullar
Directors breached their fiduciary dduties by purchasing property for themselves that was an opportunity for the company
Re produce marketing consortium ltd
Same as earlier mentioned case, focusing on directors libaility for wrongful trading when they allowed the company to incur debts knowing it couldnt avoid insolvency