Tort - Employers' Liability Flashcards
What four duties does an employer owe employees (+ Authority)
Wilson and Clyde Coal v English:
1- Competent Staff
2- Adequate plant, equipment and machinery
3- Safe system of work
Latimer v AEC
Safe workplace
A duty to provide competent staff arises when an employer knows or ought to know about the risks posed by an employee
Hudson v Ridge
The risk posed by an employee may include risk of causing psychiatric harm (bullying)
Waters
Employers have a duty to ensure their systems of work do not contribute to psychiatric harm (stress), but only if reasonably foreseeable
Walker v Northumberland
To decide if it would be reasonably foreseeable that work would cause stress, what two things should be considered?
1- Nature and extent of the work
2- Signs the employee may be getting stressed (excluding personal life pressures)
A duty to provide a safe workplace exists wherever the employee is working, not just at the employer’s premises
General Cleaning Contracts v Christmas
Consent is rarely a successful defence for employers
Smith v Baker
Courts will make allowances for employees working in noisy/ boring and repetitive environments when deciding contributory negligence
Caswell v Powell Duffryn Collieries
If a claimant can show an employee has committed a tort in the course of employment they can sue the employer though the legal principle of vicarious liability
Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society
What three criteria suggest someone is an employee rather than an independent contractor (+ Authority)
Ready Mixed Concrete:
1- Provides work for REMUNERATION
2- Under the CONTROL OF ANOTHER
3- contract OF service (not contract FOR service)
What is the Salmond definition of ‘in the course of employment’?
1- Wrongful ACTS authorised by employer
2- Wrongful MODES of carrying out authorised acts
An off-duty employee protecting his employers property has implied permission to do so and is therefore acting in the course of employment
Poland v Parr
An oil tank driver smoking when unloading oil was doing an authorised act in an unauthorised way and was therefore still acting in the course of employment
Century Insurance v NI Road Transport Board
Employee punching customer in the face not in the course of employment (old case, may be different today)
Warren v Henleys
What conditions need to be met for an employer to be vicariously liable for intentional torts committed purely for the employees benefit?
1- Tort stemmed from an act authorised by the employer (Lloyd v Grace Smith)
2- Tort closely connected to the work the employee is employed to do (Lister v Hesley Hall) can be interpreted widely (Mattis v Pollock)