Contract - Undue Influence Flashcards
Define Undue Influence
Where one party takes advantage of a relationship of trust and confidence
What may constitute actual undue influence
Husband shouting at wife to sign a document (hard to prove)
When will undue influence be presumed? (+ Authority)
RBS v Etridge
1- There is a relationship of trust and confidence
2- The transaction calls for an explanation
Husband/ Wife or cohabitee relationship does not raise an irrebuttable presumption of fiduciary relationship
(Barclays v O’Brien)
The transaction must be such that it is not readily explainable by the relationship of the parties
RBS v Etridge
What is the effect of notice?
If the bank/ lender has actual/ constructive notice of the undue influence they will be tainted with it. Consequently, the contract will be voidable
When will a lender have constructive notice?
1- Ought to have been put on inquiry of the risk of undue influence by the debtor
2- Did not take reasonable steps to ensure the surety was aware of the implications of what she was signing
When are banks put on inquiry?
whenever the surety-debtor relationship is non-commercial (RBS v Etridge)
Joint advance (e.g. straightforward mortgage) will not put bank on notice as wife not standing as surety
Pitt v CIBC Mortgages
how can the lender reasonably ensure the surety’s consent was properly obtained? (3 ways)
RBS v Etridge
1- Have a private meeting
2- Warn surety of the risks
3- Urge surety to take legal advice
In extreme situations where the transaction is particularly disadvantageous to a surety the creditor could ensure and insist they receive independent legal advice
Lyonnais v Burch
What remedies are available for undue influence?
rescission (so long as not barred)
What are the four bars to rescission?
1-Delay
2- Impossibility
3- Innocent 3rd party
4- Affirmation
A case where there was actual undue influence (Nephew forcing old lady to enter into a contract)
Daniel v Drew
How will a fact-based fiduciary duty be spotted?
LAC Minerals:
1- X has undertaken to act for Y
2- Y reasonably beleives X will act exclusively in Y’s interest / their joint interests