ToRR: Duck's phase model Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who proposed a phase model of relationship breakdown?

A

Steve Duck (2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Duck argue about the process of a breakup?

A
  • ending of a relationship is not a one- off event but a process that takes time & goes through 4 distinct phases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is each phase marked by?

A
  • each phase is marked by one partner (or both) reaching a ‘threshold’- a point at which their perception of the relationship changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does the road to break up begin?

A
  • once a partner realises they are dissatisfied & distressed about the way things are going
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first phase and the threshold of this phase?

A
  • Inter-psychic phase
    Threshold= ‘I can’t stand this anymore’, indicating a determination that something has to change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens at the intra-psychic phase?

A
  • focus of this phase is on cognitive processes occurring within the individual
  • partner mulls their thoughts of dissatisfaction & their reasons for dissatisfaction privately & may share with a trusted friend
  • weigh up pros & cons & evaluate these against alternatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the second phase and threshold of this phase?

A
  • Dyadic phase
    Threshold= ‘I would be justified in withdrawing’ come to a conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens at the Dyadic phase?

A
  • focus is on the interpersonal processes between two partners
  • series of confrontations in which the relationship is discussed & dissatisfactions are aired (e.g. lack of equity, complaints)
  • self- disclosure becomes more deeper >express thoughts that they had been withholding in the intra-psychic phase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two possible outcomes of the dyadic phase?

A
  • a determination to continue breaking up the relationship
  • or renewed desire to repair it

if the rescue plans fails from dyadic phase a new threshold is reached > social

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the third phase and the threshold of this phase?

A
  • social phase
  • Threshold= ‘I mean it’ dissatisfied partner concludes this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens at the social phase?

A
  • focus is now on wider processes involving the couples social networks> break up made public
  • partners seek support & try to forge pacts > mutual friends expected to choose a side
  • some friends provide reassurance & reinforcement
  • some may hasten the end of relationship by providing previously secret info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the fourth phase and the threshold of this phase?

A
  • Grave dressing phase
  • Threshold= ‘it is now inevitable’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens at the Grave dressing phase?

A
  • focus of this phase is the aftermath
  • partners spin a favourable story about the breakdown for public consumption
  • allows partners to save & maintain rep (social credit), showing other partner in a bad light
  • also involves creating a personal story than you can live with (rewriting history)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a strength of Duck’s phase model?

A
  • it suggests ways in which relationship breakdown can be reversed
  • model is useful as it recognises that different repair strategies are more effective in the breakdown than others
  • Duck recommends that people in intra-psychic phase > focus their worrying on positive aspects of their partner
    -insights can be used in relationship counselling to help people through difficult times, real-life app
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a counterpoint to the strength of Duck’s phase model?

A
  • model is based on relationship breakdown in individualistic cultures (US)
  • Moghaddam et al > relationships in individualist cultures are voluntary & frequently come to an end
  • relationships in collectivist cultures are less easy to end & involved the wider family
    -model not useful for all culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a limitation of the original model?

A
  • incomplete explanation of relationship breakdown
  • Duck & Rollie added a fifth phase > resurrection phase
  • Ex-partners apply to future relationships experiences gained from old one
  • also argue that progression from one phase to the next is not inevitable > possible to return to earlier point in phase
  • processes that occur in RB (role of gossip in social phase) is more important than linear movement from one phase to another
  • original model does not account for complexity of RB & its dynamic nature
17
Q

What is another limitation of Duck’s phase model?

A
  • underexplains the early phases of breakdown
  • much of the research is retrospective
  • p’s in research studies report their experiences some time after the relationship has ended > might be inaccurate, distorted or unreliable
  • especially true for earlier stages which occur ‘long ago’
  • model may not explain earlier phases as well as later ones
18
Q

What does does Duck’s model not explain and explain who & what overcomes this?

A
  • focused on what happens in relationship breakdown but not why it happens
    -Felmlee > fatal attraction hypothesis focuses on the why
  • suggests that the trait that led to initial attraction may later be seen as undesirable
  • e.g. one partner may become dissatisfied because her partners ‘great sense of humour
    later becomes ‘can’t take anything seriously’
    -limited explanation