Topic Evaluations Flashcards
MSM
not unitary - KF, Tulving
case study evidence -HM
research support - Baddeley, serial position
LTM
neurological evidence - tulving scans
clinical evidence - HM, Clive Wearing
problems w clinical - lack control
WMM
clinical evidence - KF
dual task performance - Baddeley
central exec - too vague, EVR
Interference
validity issues - McGeoch and McDonald, no CV
limited explanation - rare conditions
real-world application - Baddeley and hitch rugby
Retrieval Failure
research support - Darley et al
context effects - Baddeley, have to be very different
recall v recognition - Godden and Baddeley replicated
Misleading Info
real world application - cognitive interview
low ecological validity - Foster, Yuille and Cutshall
demand characteristics - Zaragoza and McCloskey
Anxiety
unusualness - pickel
research support - Christianason and Hubinette
methodological limits - limited control, manipulation
Cognitive Interview
research support - meta analysis more accurate
quality not quantity - Kohnken 81 v 61
time consuming - Kebbel and Wagstaff
Types of Conformity
research support - aschs study
individual difference -nAffiliators, Perrin and Spencer
Asch
child of its time - Perrin and Spencer, probation
artificial - demand characteristics, trivial
limited application - gender bias Neto, culture bias
ethical issues - deceived, distress
Zimbardo
demand characteristics - banauzizi and movehedi
lack of research support - reicher and halsam
real world application - abu ghraib
individual difference - Fromm
Milgram
low internal validity - Orne and Holland, Perry
good external - Hofling et al 21/22
ethical issues - deceived, no protection
Situational Variables
research support - bickman uniform
low internal validity - orne and holland
cross culture replication - Meeus and Raj, Smith and
Situational Explanations
research support - Blass and Schmitt
limited explanation - Rank and Jacobson, milgram
culture differences - Kilham, Mantell
Dispositional Explanation
research support - Milgram and Elms
limited explanation - germany, scapegoating
methodological issue, Greenstein, social desire
Resistance to Social Influence
research support - Asch 5.5 Milgram 10
locus of control - Holland 37 internal 23 ex
contradictions - Twenge et al
Minority Influence
research support - Moscovici, Wood et al
research support - Martin
artificial tasks - doesn’t relate such as jury
Social Change
research support - Nolan et al
contradictory - DeJong, Foxcraft
barriers to social change - Bashir, stereotypes
Behaviourist
well controlled - lab, broken down
real world application - phobias/gambling
environmental determinism - ignores free will
animal studies - not general and unethical
Social Learning Theory
cognitive factors - not simplified
real world application - explains culture difference
rely on lab studies - contrived expected behaviour
underestimates biological - environment only, testosterone
Cognitive Approach
scientific methods - reliable, as controlled
real world application - reforms in police, understanding in mental illness
machine reductionism - ignore human emotion
Biological Approach
scientific methods - objective techniques, tech advances
real world application - clinical depression
biological determinism - phenotype influenced by environment, free will
Psychodynamic Approach
explanatory power - influences, significant in childhood
real-world application - psychoanalysis, dream analysis
untestable concepts - unfalsifiable, unconscious level, subjective cases
Humanistic Approach
not reductionist - doesn’t break, holism
positive approach - human into psych, people as good
western cultural bias - freedom and growth individualist, other cultures don’t identify