topic 6 (memory) lecture 1&2 (working memory) Flashcards
outline the two stores of memory proposed by William James
PRIMARY MEMORY (now thought of as working memory)
- information available to consciousness
- retrieval effortless
SECONDARY MEMORY
- long term memory, not cognitively available unless consciously activated
- retrieval effortful
what did george miller say about working mirror?
- only around 7 (+/-2) items or numbers can be stored in primary memory/short term storage
- the term item is not nessercarily fixed as individual items can be chunked to make single big items e.g k210 918 12
how do memory studies illustrate the primacy and regency effect
- participants are presented with long lists of words
- they are better able to remember words at the beggining (primacy effect) and end (regency effect) of lists
- the regency effect is stronger than the primary effect
Outline the modal model of memory
how does shallice and warringtons study support the modal model of memory?
patient with brain damage/memory loss
showed greatly reduced short term memory
showed intact long term memory
supports theory that short term memory and long term memory are different stores
what was baddely and hitch’s study on memory?
People were asked to memorise a string of numbers/digits
they then were presented with a simple spatial reasoning task regarding the position of numbers
e. g 2,3, 2 is after 3, correct?
- they could perform the task accuratly regardless of how many digits, but the task took longer as more digits were increased
- this indicates that different stores of the brain are used when there is more items (if this wasnt the case, errors would increase but not process length)
what does baddelys ORIGINAL model of working memory look like?
what does the central executive do in baddelys model of working memory?
Governs use of stores, the manipulation of working memory, and the retrieval of information from long term memory
what are two assumptions of the model of working memory?
if two tasks use same parts of the model they cannot be carried out well at the same time
if two tasks use different parts then they should be succesfully completed accuratly
what are two parts of the phonological loop?
phological store
articulatory process
what is robbins et al study on working memory model?
participants were chess players judged on the quality of their moves under different conditions:
CONTROL GROUP- asked to tap on table
CENTRAL EXECUTIVE LOAD - asked to generate random numbers
VISUO-SPATIAL LOAD - asked to tap in clockwise manner
PHONOLOGICAL LOOP LOAD - asked to repeat ‘seesaw’
RESULTS:
- the control group and the phonological suppression group scored equally well
- scores were significantly lower for the central executive load group and the visual spatial load group
- in terms of the central executive load group, the load of the task made it hard for it to direct the elements of the chess task to the appropriate memory stores
- in terms of the visal spatial task, both that and chess rely on the operations of the visual spatial group so it was difficult
Outline the case study of patient PV
- dissociation between phonological and visual information after brain damage
- verbal working memory very bad - when presented verbally with digits she could repeat two items
- when the same stimuli was presented visually she had a normal span
this suggests phonological and visual information have different stores
what is the phonological similarity effect?
- you ‘hear’ or ‘rehearse’ in an internal voice
- recall of characters is more difficult if the series has greater phonological similarity
- e.g pvcg compared xrfy
- this indicates that our internal voice plays a role in the operations of working memory
outline Paulesu’s study on working memory using PET scans
- ppts asked to hold 6 items in memory
- depending on the trial items were either english letters or korean characters
- there was an activation of language specific areas such as Broca’s or Wernicke’s area for English letters but not in korean letters
FURTHER STUDY
- to distinguish which area was responsible for the reshearsal of items (articulatory loop) vs. what was responsible for the storage
- they added another task where participants had to decide whether a letter rhymed with another
- the area in the front of the brain was significantly more activated in the rhyming task, and therefore specialised in functions of the articulatory loop