Topic 6-Educational policy and inequality Flashcards
Educational Policy
Refers to the plans and strategies for education introduced by the government
Things to consider
-Equal opportunities
-Selection and choice
-Control of education
-Marketisation and privatisation
Educational policy in Britain before 1988
-There was no state schools
-Education was available only to minority of the population
-It was provided by churches and charities.
-The state spent no public money on education
-Industrialisation increased the need for an educated workforce and from the 19th century the state began being more involved
-State made schooling compulsory from the ages of 5 to 13 in 1880
- Type of education children received depended on their class-school did nothing to change pupils ascribed status(position u are born in)
Selection:the tripartite system
From 1944-education began to be influenced by the idea of meritocracy
-The Education Act 1944 bought in the tripartite system-tried to provide SEPERATE BUT EQUAL types of schooling targeted to particular talents of children
-Act stated everything should be equal(buildings,staff etc)
Meritocracy
That individuals should achieve their status in life through their own efforts and abilities,not ascribed at birth by class background
Grammar schools
-For pupils defined as bright and academic with academic-whose abilities that lay in reasoning and solving logical problems
-MC
-They were to study mathematics,science and other difficult subjects
Secondary modern schools
-WC
-Children seen less academic and practical
-Lower level exams
-Given basic education with little opportunities
to take external examinations
Technical schools
Existed in a few area only
-These schools emphasised vocational training
-School intended for pupils with aptitudes(ability)for technical subjects
tripartite system(A03)
However it Legitimated(justified) inequality through the ideology that ability is inborn
The comprehensive school system
-Introduced in many area from 1965 and onwards by labour govt
-Aimed to make education more meritocratic and provide educational opportunities to students of all backgrounds and abilities
-Replaced grammars and made one secondary for all
-tripartite system however still existed
Two theories for the role of comprehensiveness
-Marxists and functionalist see the role very differently
-Marxists and functionalist see the role very differently
Marxists theories for the role of comprehensiveness
-Marxist see education as serving the interests of capitalism by reproducing and legitimising inequality
-Marxist argue that comprehensive schools are not meritocratic but rather reproduce class inequality from one gen to the next by the continuation of streaming and labelling
Functionalist theories for the role of comprehensiveness
-Functionalist see it as fulfilling essential functions such as meritocratic selection for future jobs
-Functionastis see comprehensive schools as more meritocratic as it gives people longer period to develop and show their skills,unlike the tripartite system with only selected the most capable children at age 11
The myth of meritocracy
legitimates class inequality by making it seem fair and just,because failure looks like its the fault of individual rather then system
Marketisation(def)
refers to the process of introducing market forces of consumer choice and competition
Marketisation has created an education market by:
-increasing both competition between schools an parents choice of school
-reducing direct state control over education
Marketisation
From 1977 the new labour government Blair and Brown followed similar emphasising standards,choices and diversity .
-From 2010 the coalition government(conservatory) took marketisation further-creating academies and free schools
Marketisation(2)
-neoliberal and new right favour marketisation.
-argue that it means that schools have to attract customers(parents)by competing with each other in the market.
-Schools that provide customers with what they want will thrive and those others will go out of business
Parentocracy-policies to promote marketisation(rule by the parent)
Publication of league tables and ofsted inspection reports that rank each school according to its exam performance,giving parents the information they need to choose right school.
-Business sponsorship of schools
-Formula funding,where schools recieve the same amount of funding for each pupil
-Specialising in IT,languages etc-to widen parental choice
-Schools have to compete to attract pupils
-Allow parents to set up free schools
-Introduction of tuiton fees for higher education
-Schools can became academies
-Open enrolment,allowing successful schools to recruit more people
The reproduction of inequality(Ball and Whitty)
Note that marketisation policies such as exam league tables and funding formula reproduce class inequality by creating inequality between schools-marketisation increasing inequality
League tables and cream-skimming
Publishing league tables ensures that schools that achieve good results are more in demand because parents are attracted to the better results
Parentocracy(David)
Describes marketised education as a parentocracy(rule by the parents)
-Claim that this encourages diversity among schools,gave parents more choice and raises standards
Barlett
-cram-skimming
-slit shifting
cream-skimming
good schools can be more selective,chose their own customers and recruit high acheiving,mainly MC pupils=pupils gain advantange
slit-shifting
good schools can avoid taking less able pupils who are likely to get poorer results and damage the schools league table position
Poor schools
cannot afford to be selective and have most less able WC pupils so their results are poorer and unattractive to MC parents=leaugue table produces class inequality
The funding formula(popular schools)
Schools are allocated a fund based on how many pupils they attract
=popular schools get more funds and can afford better qualified teachers and facilities.Their popularity allows them to be more selective and attract more MC applicants
The funding formula(poor schools)
lose income and find it difficult to match teacher skills and facilities of rival.Fail to attract pupils and funding is reduced
Parental choice:Gewirtz
Marketisation also advantages MC parents whose economic and cultural capital puts them in a better position to chose schools.
Gewitz study
Study of 14 London secondary schools and found that differences in economic and cultural capital lead to class differences as to how far they can pick secondary schools
Identifies 3 type parents:
-privileged-skilled choosers
-semi-skilled choosers
-disconnected-local choosers
privileged-skilled choosers
professional MC parents who used their economic and cultural capital and cultural capital to gain educational capital for their children.
had time to visit schools,knew how schools admissions work
can move their children around to get to the best schools
semi-skilled choosers
WC parents however they were ambitious of their children.They did lack cultural capital and failed to understand education market
disconnected-local choosers
WC parents whose choices were restricted by the lack of economic and cultural capital
-difficult to understand school admissions,less aware of choices open to them,less able to manipulate the system to their advantage,less confident dealing with schools
Myth of pantocracy
-Gewitz shows that MC are better at taking advantage of their the choices available.
Ball believes that marketasitation gives the appearance of a parentocracy
-education system seems as the parents have the choice of school however he argues that parentocracy is a myth not reality
Conservative government policies from 2010
Moved education system away from comprehensives schools run by local authorities,influenced by NR and neoliberal ideas
-David Cemeron(prime minister)freeing schools from state through policies such as academies and free schools
New labour and inequality
policies introduces to reduce inequality:
-Aim higher performance to raise aspirations of groups who are under-representative in higher education.
-Education Zone in deprived area to provide resources
-education maintenance allowance(EMAs)-payments for students from low income families to encourage them to stay after 16 in education and get a qualification
-City academies were created to give fresh start to inner city schools with mainly WC
-National Literacy stategy-lieteracy and numeracy hours
Free schools
although funded directly by state,free schools are set and run up by parents,teachers,organisation etc
-supporters of free school believe that if control is taken away by the state and power given to parents they can improve educational standards
-gives opportunity to parents and teachers to create a new school if they are not happy with the state schools
academies
from 2010-all schools in 2010 were encouraged to leave the local authority and became academies
-Academies given control over their curriculum
-funding taken from local authority government
-from 2017 over 68% of all secondary schools had converted to academy status.Some academies are run by private educational businesses and funded directly by the state.
-coalition government reduced all inequalities by allowing schools to be academies
Free schools(Allen)
research from sweden,where 20% of schools are free schools,shows that it only benefits children from highly educated families.
-Some critics state that standards in free schools are low, and this can be evidenced by the drop in Sweden’s international education ranking since the introduction of free schools in the country
(AO3) What were free schools in the US criticsed for?
for appearing to raise standards through strict pupil selection and exclusion policies.