Topic 6 - Education policy and inequality Flashcards
Selection: the tripartite system
Introduced 1944 Education Act
Supposedly based on meritocracy
Achieved status through own effort (not ascribed)
Reproduced class inequality
Discriminated against girls
key features of the tripartite system
11+ exam
depending on your result you either go to a
Grammar schools – academic
Secondary moderns – non-academic
Technical schools – skills based
Comprehensivisation
Introduced 1965
To overcome inequality of tripartite
Labour government
School catchment areas introduced rather than selection
Streaming within school – still M/C advantage
Labelling often a feature
Some LEAs retained grammar schools – Conservative areas
Two theories of the role of comprehensives
Functionalist
and
Marxist
functionalist theory of comprehensive
Social integration – all students together
Meritocratic – not selected at an early age, can develop through school
But streaming meant little mixing of social classes
Marxist theory of comprehensions
Marxist
Not meritocratic
Reproduce class inequality – labelling and streaming
Myth of meritocracy – appear to offer equal opportunity, so failure to achieve is blamed on individual.
Introducing the market to education:
Choice
Competition
Reduction of state control
MARKETISATION
Introduced 1988 – Education Reform Act (ERA)
Conservative government – Thatcher (New Right)
Market forces in education
Competition (league tables)
Consumer choice (who can choose?)
Power to parents rather than teachers and schools - parentocracy
Continued by 1997 Labour government
2010 further steps such as academies and free schools
Favoured by New Right as makes schools raise standards to attract ‘customers’ in competition
FEATURES OF MARKETISATION
Publication of exam results & Ofsted reports
Business sponsorship of schools
Open enrolment – no catchment
Specialist schools – to widen parental choice
Funding per pupil – same for all
Can opt out of LEA – become academies
Schools compete to attract pupils
Tuition fees for HE
Parents can set up free schools
REPRODUCTION OF INEQUALITY
through:
League tables
and
Funding formula
League tables
High achieving schools can be more selective
Lower position schools unable to be selective
Cream-skimming and silt-shifting
Funding formula
Better schools: more funding and better teachers and facilities
Unpopular schools: lose income; difficult to match skills
Marketisation criticised by many – Ball and Whitty.
Increased inequality due to benefit mainly to M/C.
GERWIRTZ:
PARENTAL CHOICE
Privileged-skilled choosers
Disconnected-local choosers
Semi-skilled choosers
Middle-class parents advantaged by choice
Privileged-skilled choosers
Professional m/c – possess cultural capital
Disconnected-local choosers
Working class – lack cultural capital
Semi-skilled choosers
Ambitious w/c - limited cultural capital
Middle-class parents advantaged by choice
Linked to their economic and cultural capital
MYTH OF PARENTOCRACY
Marketisation reproduces and legitimates inequality.
Ball: only appears to be choice – cultural capital determines the amount.
Gerwirtz: Middle class can take advantage
Leech and Campos: middle class can afford to move closer to better schools (Topic 1).
Parentocracy appears to make the system fair but is a myth.