Topic 4 - Gender differences in education Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

external factors in gender differences in achievement

A

The impact of feminism
Changes in the family
Changes in women’s employment
Girls’ changing ambitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The impact of feminism

A

The feminist movement has improved the rights of women as well as raising women’s expectations, self-esteem & motivation. Women are no longer strictly bound to the mother/ housewife role.

McRobbie (1994): Magazines such as Jackie in the 1970s emphasised the importance of getting married, whereas nowadays priorities have changed & women are faced with more positive role models in the media.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Changes in the family

A

increase in divorce rate
increase in cohabitation
increase in lone-parent families (usually female headed)

Changes affect girls’ attitudes to education. Women may need to support their families. Women are not willing to be supported by a man.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Changes in women’s employment

A

The 1970 Equal Pay Act: Makes it illegal to pay one sex more than another for work of equal value – pay gap halved.

Francis (2001) interviewed girls about their career aspirations & concluded that, due to increased employment opportunities, females have become extremely ambitious & aim for ‘high professions’ such as doctors & solicitors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Girls’ changing ambitions

A

Girls’ ambitions are becoming more career-oriented.

Sharpe (1994): study shows changes to girls’ aspirations from 1970s to 1990s.

O’Connor (2006): marriage and children not major life plans.

Beck & Beck-Gernsheim (2001): individualisation means value is placed on achievement and self-sufficiency.

Fuller (2011): education central to identity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Internal factors and gender differences in achievement

A

1.Equal opportunities policies

  1. Positive role models in school
  2. GCSE and coursework
  3. Teacher attention
  4. Challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
  5. Selection and league tables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. Equal opportunities policies
A

Teachers need to ensure both genders have equal opportunities

Policies:
GIST and WISE – to encourage girls to pursue non-traditional careers

National Curriculum – all students study same subjects

Boaler (1998) equal opportunities policies key in changing girls’ achievement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 Positive role models in schools

A

significantly less female teaches who are in positions of leadership in school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 GCSE and coursework

A

Mitsos & Browne (1998): girls more successful in coursework; spend more time, take care, meet deadlines, equipped for lessons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4 Teacher attention

A

French & French (1993): boys get more attention, but this is negative

Francis (2001): boys more attention, but more harshly disciplined, low teacher expectations

Swann (1998): different communication style, boys dominant in whole class, girls prefer paired or small group

Teachers see girls as cooperative and so give more positive attention – leading to self-fulfilling prophecy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5 Challenging stereotypes in the curriculum

A

Changes to textbooks, reading schemes, learning materials.

Women no longer seen as purely housewives and mothers.

Weiner (1995): teachers challenge stereotypes; sexist images removed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

6 Selection and league tables

A

Marketisation policies (making schools compete for students – see Topic 6) have meant girls are favoured by schools.

Jackson (1998): league tables make high achieving girls attractive. Leads to self-fulfilling prophecy as girls likely to go to good schools.

Slee (1998) boys less attractive due to behavioural difficulties and exclusions.

Boys may give schools a bad image.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Liberal feminists
view of school

A

Celebrate progress made
Further progress from equal opportunities policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Radical feminists

A

System is patriarchal (male dominated)

Sexual harassment in schools
Girls’ limited subject and careers choices

More male secondary heads
Women ignored in curriculum, e.g. history (compare to ethnocentric)

Gender pay gap after leaving education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Symbolic capital girls

A

Archer et al (2010):
conflict between working-class girls’ identity and the ethos of the school
working-class feminine identities for status from peers
Hyper-heterosexual identity, being loud, having a boyfriend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hyper-heterosexual feminine identities

A

Girls aim to be ‘desirable’ and ‘glamorous’.

Similar to the idea of ‘Nike’ identities.

Status from peers

Conflict with school
too much jewellery

Wrong clothing

Makeup

Creates symbolic violence – their culture seen as worthless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

symbolic violence

A

working class culture is seen as worthless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Having a boyfriend earns symbolic capital:

A

lower aspirations
lower interest in university
lower interest in ‘masculine’ subjects
desire to ‘settle down’

18
Q

Being loud meant not conforming to stereotypes:

A

conflict with teachers
further from ‘ideal pupil’

19
Q

‘Successful’ working-class girls

A

Some working-class girls do achieve and go to university.

Evans (2009):
Interviewed working-class girls in south London comprehensive. Girls wanted to go to university to earn more money to help their families.

20
Q

Archer (2010):

A

Working-class habitus – key feature is preference for staying local.
Prevents them attending elite universities – limiting success.

21
Q

external boys

A

Boys and literacy
Globalisation and the decline of traditional men’s jobs

22
Q

internal boys

A

Feminisation of education
Shortage of male primary school teachers
‘Laddish’ subcultures
The moral panic about boys

23
Q

Boys and literacy

A

DCSF (2007):the ‘gender gap’ is the result of poor literacy among males. (The DCSF is now called the Department for Education.)
Reading is ‘feminised’.
Boys are socialised to be ‘active’, girls have ‘bedroom culture’.

24
Q

Globalisation and the decline of traditional men’s jobs

A

Since the 1980s, ‘masculine’ jobs in manufacturing have moved abroad & thus male employment opportunities have been reduced.
Mitsos & Browne (1998) suggest that this has created a ‘crisis of masculinity’.

25
Q

Feminisation of education

A

Sewell (2006) argues:
education has become ‘feminised’
education does not nurture ‘masculine’ traits of competitiveness and leadership
And the curriculum causes boys to underachieve:
coursework is a cause of boys’ underachievement
need a greater focus on outdoor activity and more exams

26
Q

Shortage of male primary school teachers

A

DfES (2012): 14% of primary school teachers are male.

Some suggest boys need male teachers from an early age to impose strict discipline.

27
Q

Are more male teachers really needed?

A

Francis (2006): two thirds of 708 year-olds did not think gender of a teacher matters.

28
Q

‘Laddish’ subcultures

A

Epstein (1998): construction of ‘laddish’ subcultures in school. Working-class boys labelled sissies/gay if appear to be ‘swots’. ‘Real boys don’t work.’
Francis (2001):
Boys see schoolwork as effeminate.
Reject school to avoid being called ‘gay’.
Increase in laddish s/cultures due to more girls now in masculine areas.

29
Q

The moral panic about boys

A

Ringrose (2013): moral panic about ‘failing boys’
Unemployable underclass – threat to social stability
Now policy moves to raise boys’ achievement
Policies for boys:
Ignore class disadvantage
Ignores problems faced by girls in school

30
Q

Explanations for gender differences in subject choice

A

1 Gender role socialisation
2 Gendered subject images
3 Gender identity and peer pressure
4 Gendered career opportunities

31
Q

Gender role socialisation

A

Fiona Norman (1988): Girls and boys are dressed differently, given different toys, encouraged to take part in different activities.

Eileen Byrne (1979):
Teachers encourage boys to be tough and to show initiative.
Girls are expected to be quiet and helpful and not rough or noisy

32
Q

Gender role socialisation - gender domains

A

Children’s beliefs about ‘gender domains’ are shaped by their early experiences and expectations of adults (Browne and Ross, 1991).

They see some tasks as part of male or female ‘territory’ and therefore as relevant or irrelevant to themselves.

33
Q

2 Gendered subject images

A

kelly - science is seen as a boys subject as pics in science textbooks are mainly of boy - gender domain, ‘its not for me’

34
Q

Gender identity and peer pressure

A

Girls and sport:
Paechter – girls in sport not seen as feminine.
Dewar – sporty girls seen as ‘lesbian’.

35
Q

Gendered career opportunities

A

Women – childcare and nursing

Traditional gender identities – working-class habitus

36
Q

Factors impacting on pupils’ sexual & gender identities

A

Double standards of moral expectations of girls & boys
Verbal abuse of girls
The application of the male gaze to girls
Influence of male peer groups on expression of masculinity
Impact of female peer groups on policing of identity
Impact of teacher discipline on boys & girls

37
Q

Hegemonic masculinity

A

Connell (1995):
Heterosexual masculine identity
Subordination of female/gay identities

38
Q

Double standards

A

Lees (1993): sexual standards different, boys boast – girls called ‘slags’

39
Q

Verbal abuse

A

Connell - slags/drags, ‘gay’, ‘queer’, ‘lezzie’ shape and reinforce male power

40
Q

The male gaze

A

Mac an Ghaill - girls seen as sexual objects, reinforcing dominant heterosexual masculinity

41
Q

Male peer groups

A

Mac an Ghaill - anti-school subcultures, class-based – ‘macho lads’/’dickhead achievers’/’real Englishmen’. Dominant version changes through school

42
Q

Female peer groups

A

Ringrose, Currie - policing identity – idealised feminine identity, sexualised identity, ‘tramps’ who don’t conform, symbolic capital from boyfriends, ‘boffin’ identity

43
Q

Teachers and discipline

A

Archer - boys told off for behaving like girls, verbal abuse of girls ignored, male teachers ‘rescuing’ female teachers