Topic 3 - Ethnic differences in achievement Flashcards
Cultural Deprivation: 1) Intellectual & linguistic skills
Bowker (1968): ‘The Education of Coloured Immigrants’.
A lack of standard English creates a huge barrier to UK education.
Bereiter and Engelmann (1966)
Suggested the language spoken in low-income black American families is inadequate for educational success
Cultural Deprivation: 1) Intellectual & linguistic skills
Evaluation
The Swann Report (1985) found that language differences had little impact on achievement.
The theory doesn’t explain why Indian pupils do so well.
Cultural deprivation: 2) Attitudes & values
These arguments suggest that different ethnic groups are socialised into (or ‘inherit’) different attitudes & values.
This includes a lack of motivation .
CD theorists claim Black children have fatalistic – ‘live for today’ attitudes – just as they claim this for the working class as well.
Cultural deprivation: 2) Attitudes & values
Evaluation
Black Caribbean girls out preform white students, they could not achieve this without motivation.
Cultural deprivation : 3) Family structure & parental support
Murray (1984): (Note: an old study) New Right
African Caribbean lone-parenthood is to blame. Lack of male role models means that mothers struggle to socialise children adequately.
Scruton (1986): (Note: an old study)
Low achievement is the result of ethnic minorities failing to embrace & conform to British culture.
Cultural deprivation : 3) Family structure & parental support Evaluation
Sewell: fathers, gangs and culture
Sewell does not agree absent fathers are the problem for Black boys.
Instead, the problem is a lack of ‘tough love’ – firm, fair, respectful and
non-abusive discipline.
Boys turn to street gangs for role models.
This leads to peer pressure to be anti-school.
Wanting to do well in education was seen as ‘selling out’.
According to Sewell, this can be overcome by raising the aspirations of Black boys
and by having greater expectations of them.
Asian families
Drive and Ballard (1981):
Asian families bring educational benefits:
- positive attitudes towards education
- high aspirations for the future
Lupton (2004): adult authority in Asian families is similar to the model that operates in schools:
- expectation of respect towards adults
White working-class families
80% of 11-16 old ethnic minority pupils aspired to go to university
But only 68% of white pupils did.
Lupton: this lower level of aspiration and achievement may be due to a lack of parental support .
Evans (2006): ‘street’ culture in white working-class areas is to blame for underachievement.
Compensatory education
If cultural deprivation exists, this could be overcome.
One way is to introduce programmes aimed at those who are seen to be deprived.
Research some of the compensatory schemes shown below:
Operation Head Start (1960s)
Educational Priority Areas (1960s)
Education Action Zones (1990s)
Sure Start (2000s)
Criticisms of cultural deprivation theory
Driver (1977) highlights how ethnicity can be an advantage in education, e.g. African Caribbean girls do very well in school.
Lawrence (1982): underachievement not due to low self-esteem – it’s due to racism.
Keddie (1973) says that to blame culture is to blame the victims of educational failure.
Criticisms of Compensatory education
Compensatory education is also criticised because it attempts to impose dominant White culture on those who already have a culture of their own.
Alternatives are:
Multicultural education – recognising the value of all cultures.
Anti-racist education – actively challenging prejudice and discrimination.
Material deprivation – figures
According to Palmer (2012):
Almost half ethnic minority children live in low-income households
Minority ethnic groups are twice as likely to be unemployed as Whites
Material deprivation - reasons
Many minority ethnic groups live in economically depressed areas
Purdah may prevent Muslim women from working.
May lack recognised qualifications and language skills if recently arrived to UK, e.g. refugees.
Asylum seekers may be prevented from seeking work.
Racism in work and housing may prevent many from gaining jobs and places to live (see next section).
Racism in wider society:
Mason (2000)
‘Discrimination is a continuing & persistent feature of the experience of Britain’s citizens of minority ethnic origin’.
Rex (1986)
Racism leads to social exclusion and thus to poverty. This is shown in housing, employment & education. Racism also leads to discrimination both inside & outside the classroom.
Wood et al (2010)
Sent identical letters to 100 top UK companies but alternated between the names ‘Evans’ & ‘Patel’……… the replies to the ‘White’ candidate were more helpful and informative.
Challenging the cultural deprivation view
Gillborn & Mirza (2000)
It is the actions of schools & not cultural background which causes ethnic minority underachievement.
E.g. in one local education authority, Black pupils were the highest achievers at start of primary but were the worst performers by GCSE.
A pupil’s culture doesn’t change over time, so it must be schools’ actions that are shaping pupils’ performance.