Topic 5 Changing family patterns Flashcards
Divorce
What are the 3 changing patterns of divorce?
- Since the 1960s, divorce has increased
- 65% of divorce applications come from women
- Most common reason for a woman to be granted divorce = unreasonable behaviour of her husband
What are the 7 Reasons for the increase in divorce?
- Changes in laws
- declining stigma and changing attitudes
- secularisation
- rising expectations of marriage
- woman’s increased financial independence
- feminist explanation
- modernity and individualism
Why has changes in laws increased divorce?
- Equalising and widening the grounds for divorce
- Making divorce cheaper – introduction of legal aid for divorce cases
This led to the following:
More divorce applications from women and a doublingdivorce rate
Mitchell and Goody
What is the declining stigma and changing attitudes doing that lead to divorce?
- Stigma = negative label, social disapproval or shame
- Previously, divorce was stigmatised in society
- Mitchell and Goody, 1997 = since the 1960s there has been a decline in the attached stigma to divorce
- Divorce is more common – it becomes more normalised
How has secularisation effected an increase in divorce?
- Secularisation = decline in the influence of religion in society
- The religious opposition to divorce holds less weight
- People are less likely to be influenced by religious teachings when making decisions
- Many churches have softened theirviews on divorce
Fletcher, Allan and Crow
Rising expection in marriage effecting the increase in divorce
- Fletcher, 1966 = people are now placing high expectations on marriage and this is causing a rise in divorce rates
- In the past, families wereinvolvedin marriages and it was an economically motivated decision. There were lower expectations of marriage, less likely to be dissatisfied with the absence of intimacy.
- People are now less willing to tolerate an unhappy marriage
The idea that marriage should be based on love has become dominant – couples divorce if they don’t seek this fulfilment. - Allan and Crow, 2001 =‘Love, personal commitment and intrinsic satisfaction are now seen as the cornerstones of marriage. The absence of these feelings is itself justification forending the relationship.’
How has a woman’s increased financial independence effected an increase in marriage?
- Women are in better financial positions and are therefore less dependent on their husbands
- They are more open to ending an unsatisfactory marriage
- Women can support themselves in the event of a divorce
- Women have theirown separate source of income
hochschild
What is the feminist explanation for an increase in divorce?
- The dual burden women are under has created a source of conflict between couples and this is leading to high divorce rates
- Change for women in the private sphere has been less significant than in wider society. Marriage is patriarchal
- Hochschild 1997 = women feel less valued at home.Women feel frustrated at men’s resistance to complete housework
- This leads to high divorce rates
Beck and Giddens
How has modernity and individualism effected an increase in divorce?
Beck and Giddens, 1992:
Traditional norms have lost influence – individuals are pursuing their own self-interests (individualisation thesis)
Relationships become more fragile
Search for a ‘pure relationship’ = exists to solely fulfil individual needs.
This leads to higher divorce rates
Individualism is encouraged in modern society
What is the meaning of a high divorce rate according to Functionalists and New Right?
Functionalist
- High divorce rates shows that people have higher expectations of what they want from marriage
- High rate of re-marriage shows that people are still committed to the idea of being married
New Right
- Divorce is undesirable as it threatens the stability of society
- Divorce creates an increase in welfare-dependent female lone parents who are a burden on the state
What is meant by a high divorce rate according to feminists and interactionists?
Feminists
- Divorce is seen as desirable because it shows that women are breaking free from patriarchal oppression in the family
Interactionalists
Divorce has a different meaning to each different individual – cannot generalise
What is meant by a high divorce rate according to postmodernists and personal life perspective?
postmodernists
High divorce rates show that individuals have freedom of choice to end their relationships when their needs are not being fulfilled
personal life perspective
- Divorce is a transition into another life course
- It can bring some issues, but it is a change that families can adapt to
What are the 5 reaons for changing patterns of marriage?
- changed attitudes
- secularisation
- declining stigma to alternatives
- changing position of women
- fear of divorce
Reasons for changing patterns of marriage
- changing attitudes
- secularisation
- declining stigma to alternatives
- changing postion of women
- fear of divorce
- less societal pressure to get married. There is more emphasis on the quality of the relationship than its legal status
- influence of religion declines and so does the importance of marriage. People feel freer to not be married
- more acceptable to cohabit, remain single and have children outside of marriage
- women are less economically dependent on men. Gives them more freedom to not get married
- = some may be put off marriage because of high divorce rates
remarriages , later in life , church weddings
3 Additional changing patterns of marriage
- Remarriages are increasing because there are more divorces
- People are marrying at a later age because people are spending more time in education and establishing their careers
Couples also choose to cohabit for a while before they marry - Church weddings are decreasing due to secularisation and because churches also refuse to marry divorcees
What does cohabitiation mean?
2 trends and stats.
**Cohabitation **= an unmarried couple in a sexual relationship living together
This is increasing:
2. 2.9 million cohabiting heterosexual couples
3. 69,000 cohabiting same sex couples
4 reasons for the increase in cohabitation
- Declining stigma attached to sex outside of marriage
- Young people are more accepting of cohabitation
- Increased career options for women mean they don’t need the financial security of marriage
- Secularisation
2 views of cohabitation
- Some see cohabitation as a permenant alternative to marriage
- Others see cohabitation as a step towards getting married – seen as a trial marriage period
Same-sex relationships
- There is increased social acceptance of these relationships
- Social policy now treats all couples more equally
- 2014 – same sex couples have been able to marry
weeks, weston
chosen families
- Weeks, 1999 = homosexual people create families based on the idea of ‘friendship as kinship’. These are chosen families and provide the same security as heterosexual families
- Weston, 1992 = many gay couples are cohabiting as stable partners
- The impact of legal acceptance has meant that commitment is no longer negotiated and relationships are more stable
1 stat about one person households
2 reasons for these changes
- 40% of all one person households are over 65
- Increased divorce has led to an increase in one person households, especially for men
- Decline in marriage = more people are single and are choosing to live alone. ‘Creative singlehood’
parents and children
childbearing
Carrying and having the child
- Half of all children are now born outside marriage
- Women are having children later = average age in 2021 was 28 years old
- Women are having fewer children
- More women are remaining childless
reasons for childbearing
- There is a decline in stigma
- Increase in cohabitation
- Women now have more options to their lives than just motherhood. Their focus has shifted.
parents and children
Lone parent families
Lone parent families make up 22% of all families with children
* Over 90% of these are headed by lone mothers
* Divorced lone mothers used to be the main group of lone mothers, but now it is single lone mothers
* A child living with a lone parent is twice as likely to be in poverty than a child living with both parents