Topic 4 - Partition and independence Flashcards
discuss the significance of the SWW
- INC unhappy with Linlithgow’s declaration of war, Muslims contributing but much smaller group
- war wasn’t going well for Britain - Japan threat/take Burma/attempt to invade East India
- As Britain fought almost to the point of economic exhaustion, the maintenance of the India Empire was worrying British politicians
what two developments did the SWW confirm
- the ending of the Raj
- the separations of Muslims and Hindus
- it shattered all hopes of Congress and the Muslim League co-existing in independent India
what was the Atlantic Charter
- August 1941
- an affirmation that all people should enjoy the right to self determination once the war was over
- Churchill and FDR
- self determination rhetoric was strongly supported by S.O.S of India, Leo Amery and the leader of the Labour Party, Clement Attlee and Cripps
why did FDR put pressure on Churchill to sign the Atlantic Charter and give India self determination
- he always thought the British Empire were not pushing self determination as much as they could and didn’t want to be made a fool of by Churchill
- Vinayak Savarkar, president of the All-Hindu Mahasbha appealed directly to FDR asking him to guarantee India’s post war freedom
- thought India must be somewhat united in order to protect itself from the war threat
- supported within the British war cabinet - convinced India’s safety depended on creation of national government immediately and not after war - not the same as self government but similar ideas to FDR
what was the significance of the Atlantic Charter
- Hopes for an independent India were raised by this act only to be swiftly dashed by Churchill who reassured the British government that self determination did not apply to India, Burma or any part of the British Empire
- Muslims angry as they are fighting and dying for British right now! - when discussed at the Viceroy’s Legislative Council, an Indian Member Jammadas Mehta reminded viceroy that Indians were dying to bring freedom to others when their own freedom was denied.
why was Churchill reluctant towards the Atlantic Charter in terms of his political stance and why did he send the Cripps Mission
- he was an imperialist and had no intention of dismantling the empire
- For Churchill the Charter was an empty claim with no real weight behind it
- a key reason for the Cripps Mission was to get American help and assistance for the war effort
- concerned by colleagues who he depended on giving support to FDR’s ideas
discuss how the Cripps Mission failure may have been seen by Churchill
- could be seen as a victory for Churchill
- but it was a victory won at too great a cost and FDR had been wrong-footed
- the Indians would not accept what had seemed to both men to be a perfectly reasonable proposal
when and why did the First Simila Conference take place
- After the war, Britain were unable to deny the contribution of Muslims/Princes States and knew India expected an element of reward for their participation
- ‘Quit India’ had caused chaos/tension that needed dealing with before India boiled over
- Wavell returned to India with a new scheme similar to that offered by Cripps
- INC leaders released from prison so they could attend, Jinnah and other Muslims did also
why did India have high hopes for new viceroy Wavell and why were they let down
- high hopes as he was quite progressive despite the conservative government and did want independence for India especially after Quit India
- but he essentially re-offered the Cripps Mission - interim government - Hindus and Muslims co-govern with Britain overseeing
why was it unlikely that the INC would accept the proposals of the First Simila Conference
- this proposed government compromised of balanced representation of communities, equal representation for Muslims and Hindus
- but INC stick to Muslims a minority and the INC represent all stance - but how could Britain offer Muslims any less than the INC after their war effort and the August Offer
- it was the best for all involved but impractical as the INC were never going to accept a demotion of power
- even with co rule Muslims still don’t have enough representation anyway
what was the outcome of the First Simla Conference
- it reached a deadlock on the issue of how Muslim members of the newly constituted Executive Council were to be chosen
- Jinnah insisted that they must all be nominated by the ML
- the INC refused to accept this restriction and still clung to the hope that the INC could be all inclusive
- on 14th July Wavell adjourned the conference having been unable to break this deadlock between the INC and the ML
- Jinnah’s request was reasonable, the INC refusal is where the issues arise
- if the INC were going to represent everyone why aren’t they accepting ideas and ideals of the ML and why do they feel they should have this complete power
what happened in Britain in July 1945
- Churchill’s conservative party (very surprisingly) lost the General Election to Clement Attlee’s Labour Party
how did the different Indian parties respond to the change in British Government from Churchill’s conservative party to Attlee’s labour party
- INC elated - the mid war satyagraha of Quit India was forgotten under Attlee
- Nehru had always felt ideologically closer to Attlee
- war had played a major role in fostering connections between INC and Labour especially between Nehru and Cripps despite the INC’s uncooperative and volatile actions of the last 5 years
- Causes problems for Jinnah/ML - they contributed through war effort while INC resigned yet the INC liked by the Labour Party and bond with them - Jinnah began to think that Britain were anti-Muslim
- Jinnah left out in the cold
- when Attlee and his cabinet turned their attention to Indian independence, the question was not whether power should be transferred but it was to whom?
- Attlee had openly said since 1930s he wanted independence for India
what did Attlee waste no time in doing once in power -
- in forming an India Committee tasked with creating and implementing British policy that would lead to independent India
- Lord Pethick Lawrence became S.O.S for India (1945-1947)
- the team however was imbued with enthusiasm but lacking in experience yet was charged with creating the policies
Lord Pethick Lawrence
- secretary of state for India under Attlee’s government
- 1945-7
- he did not have a necessarily pragmatic approach to India politics
who were the three British men responsible for the Transfer of Power from the Raj to independent India and what were they keen to avoid
- keen to avoid partition
- Attlee, S.O.S for India Pethick Lawrence, Mountbatten viceroy in 1947
- all of labour and the government at this time wanted to keep India united - no intention of granting Pakistan and splitting up country but still want India to have power
what did Attlee’s India Committee, dominated by Stafford Cripps, recommend
that elections should take place in India to allow the people to choose their own representatives in an Indian Constituent assembly
- the Constituent Assembly would meet to write the future constitution of independent India
what did Attlee’s India Committee send to India
- the Cabinet Mission
- an unannounced fact finding group of MPs to gauge the strength of support for Pakistan
- they’d only heard Jinnah mention it and the Muslims and so wanted to see how serious the want for it was and what could be done to potentially stop it
why was India in such a precarious situation ensuing the SWW
- mass unemployment in India as factories no longer need to produce 24/7 and soldiers return
- Britain been taking supply for the past 6 years, stocks are low in India
- India boiling over which adds haste to progression
- Britain can’t take another 6 or 7 years as India will riot but if you rush it there’s still gonna be problems
- Bengal famine
- Britain hadn’t deal with post war problems before which had led to disunity and Amritsar they couldn’t afford the same things to happen
what did the Constituent General Assembly Election take place against a backdrop of
- disorder, violence and mayhem caused by drought, famine, mutiny, demobilisation of soldiers leading to high unemployment and trails for captured fighters of the Indian National Army
- the red fort trials created mayhem and disorder
- many people in India been wrongly accused of things
- vital these elections went smoothly to avoid further escalation of tensions
what was the problem with the Constituent Election of 1946
- an election of this type would be done on a popular vote so the Hindus naturally dominate due to their larger proportion
- a democratic election on a divided nation like India will always leave minorities like Muslims and Sikhs out
- this perhaps demonstrates the need for a separate nation so the Muslims can truly have independence
- if India got Independence but was government was extensively dominated by the INC the Muslims are still controlled and not really independent
- the INC demographically get the biggest say in the constitution but not fair when you consider the attitude of INC to the British compared with Muslim cooperation over the war period
what was the outcome of the Constituent Election of 1946
- INC won 923 seats (58.23% of the vote)
- ML won 425 (26.81%)
- other parties won the remainder
why was the outcome of the Constituent Elections of 1946 surprising
- the INC winning 58.23% was less than expected considering the population is 80% Hindu
- the central provinces for example were essentially a Hindu land but the ML still win 13 seats
why was the outcome of the Constituent Election of 1946 problematic
- Attlee and the Labour Party expected to just give power to the INC and be done with it but now they can’t, its not as straight forwards as the INC didn’t really win the overall majority with 58%
- they had to readdress the situation and make a more clinical decision
- Demonstrated Muslims and Hindus were never gonna agree where power was concerned so perhaps separate nation was the only way forwards
why did Jinnah and the ML do so much better in the Constituent Elections of 1946 compared with the elections of 1937
- Jinnah had something to offer this time - the potential of Pakistan (day of deliverance, when INC resigned from seats in government due to Linlithgow’s declaration of war) and also almost had a promise of British support after the Muslim war effort
how did the INC respond to the outcome of the Constituent Elections of 1946
they didn’t like that the ML had won more seats than expected and subsequently a bigger hand in ruling and so were likely to do anything to stop the ML quashing their power
what did Attlee want the 1946 cabinet mission to do and why
- investigate notion of want for Pakistan
- to do everything possible to maintain a united India, one that could play a key role in Britain’s plans for security in Asia
- this suggested no Pakistan but didn’t rule out possibility of Muslim dominated states within a united India
- didn’t want to bow to Jinnah’s demands
- India would be stronger united - if Pakistan a reality what’s to stop it breaking off and making an alliance with Russia, the Middle East or China then posing a threat to India
- North West where Pakistan would be also has access to Middle East for oil
- Britain want to give India independence but not serve all ties, they want to use India as a hub for their international trading portfolio and stay on good terms - having Pakistan could threaten that
who attended Cabinet Mission meetings
- both Jinnah and Nehru
- A.V. Alexander was key British involvement
- Cripps, Pethick Lawrence
- Abul Azad - INC president
what did the INC do in 1946 that was absolute genius
- appoint a Muslim as the President of the INC
- Abul Azad
- show they do represent all
- he was essentially Gandhi and Nehru’s puppet but it was still genius from the INC
why was the respective inclusion of the three cabinet mission men important
A.V. ALEXANDER
- Key British involvement
- was the first lord of the admiralty - military leader to help with the hostility in India
- Labour MP with traditional socialist views to help accurately convey the message of Attlee
LORD PETHICK-LAWRENCE
- as S.O.S for India it was necessary for him to be on the cabinet mission but more importantly he also sung from the same page as Attlee
CRIPPS
- failed with the Cripps mission needed to redeem himself of any embarrassment
- he had always held views for purna swaraj but also wanted to protect British trade etc..