Topic 2- Changing Political relationships Flashcards
what happened to the INC between 1920 and 1930
- they transformed from being an elitist debating group to be a political force to be reckoned with
- by the mid 20s, congress had become a political party with mass appeal and a following of millions throughout India
- it sharpened its ideals/focused its impact and the Raj could not afford to ignore its power and influence
what was forgotten in the increasingly political climate of the 1920s
- relations between the Hindus and Muslims worsened
- the heady days of the Lucknow Pact
- a sperate Muslim state in the Indian subcontinent began to grow in the minds of Hindus and Muslims alike
what was Gandhi’s concept of Satyagraha
- pursuit of justice, truth and obstinacy through non violent methods
- in the years up to 1922 Gandhi led two national campaigns of civil disobedience the first been the strikes in Amritsar
- they attracted international attention due to the problems they caused for the British
- were often unsuccessful in achieving specific aims but showed the British empire could be defeated by mass peaceful confrontation
- showed that if Indians withdrew their support than the Raj could not survive
why did Gandhi hate the term passive resistance and why should it not be applied to his concept of Satyagraha
- it means resisting authority by doing nothing like a sit down protest
- Gandhi advocated non violent but active no violent non cooperation such as removing children from school
what do Satyagraha’s require from the Indian people
- full commitment
- reject campaigning for dishonourable motives
- be willing to suffer
- need to be in it for the long haul but not everyone can strike for prolonged periods, its requires a lot of money
what are the methods of satyagraha
- refusal to cooperate with raj
- hartals - mass protest often involving shutdown of workplaces
- boycotts - refusal to purchase British goods - big methods - if jewel in crown (economy) stops sparkling Britain won’t want to keep India in empire
- fasts/hunger strikes - if Gandhi dies he’d be a martyr - mass fight - Britain couldn’t win as their army made up of lots of Indians
- submission to physical violence from the British
- protest marches - Gandhi’s famous been the Salt March of 1930 attracting some 80,000 followers
why did Gandhi adopt a peasant lifestyle
- believed life would be better in small self contained communities which appealed to the Indian peasant masses
- swadeshi life
- boycott of foreign made goods
- ashram - a group life
- he identified himself with traditional Indians values
why did Jinnah leave the INC in 1920
- left in protest of decision to adopt Gandhi’s strategy of non-cooperation
- Jinnah always to work with Britain and the Raj
- huge turning point in the module and begins the separation between the INC and the ML
how did Gandhi emerge as the leader of the INC
- Gandhi had liaised with Gokhale whilst he was in South Africa and his advice he kept out of public life in India for a year while he found his feet and understood the political dynamics in India
- through his philosophies began to win the hearts and minds of the Indian masses
- he saw to achieve swaraj he would have to become politically involved India
what three things led Gandhi to change his mind and to develop the idea of swaraj or self rule for India as opposed to been for the Raj and their support
- the rowlatt acts which aimed at continuing indefinitely the repressive wartime restrictions
- the amritsar massacre of April 1919 and its tactic endorsement by large sections of the British community in India
- one of the outcomes of the Paris peace conferences that ended the FWW was that turkey had to pay huge indemnity and lose its territories - this confirmed the worst fears of Indian Muslims that white Europeans and Americans had little concern for Islamic nations and it made Gandhi realise that this could increase the idea of separateness among Muslims
why was Gandhi not opposed as leader of the INC
- his approaches had mass appeal
- there was no other all Indian political leader or group who could challenge his influence over the Indian people nor organise opposition to him
- members of Congress were so divided about which path was the best way forwards they couldn’t unite to oppose Gandhi
- he opposed Purdah
what was Gandhi’s second satyagraha of non-cooperation (1920-22)
- Indian workers boycotted Britain’s factories and goods
- mass protests
- the idea was new and non violence was debated among many
why did Gandhi’s second satyagraha happen and was the consequence of the timing of this
- because of disgust towards the repressive measures of 1919
- swaraj was declared the ultimate aim
- Gandhi set an unrealistic time frame for this of just a year but this also gained support from the masses as people wouldn’t be interested in the long haul
- sparked mass disobedience
- created opposition from Jinnah who believed that the best way to gain independence was to work with Britain through constitutional means as opposed to working against through direct action
- 30,000 who were arrested became martyrs - mass nationalism
why was Gandhi’s second satyagraha campaign difficult for the British
- every Indian in a British job boycotted on goods which hit Britain hard after the war and there was recession
- India is their bank and the jewel in the crown
- Britain were stuck because they couldn’t Amritsar again
- India were defying Britain at a difficult and scary time after Amritsar
who was opposed to Gandhi
- the princes states
- Lord reading offered provincial autonomy in return for suspension for the satyagraha movement which would have been an improvement from the government of India act of 1919 as it would have granted India more provincial control of their own affairs
- however because it was dominion status Gandhi rejected it
- this decision looked down upon by the Princely States and Jinnah who did not want to partake in the non cooperation and enjoyed the prospect of working together with the British
Hindus and Muslims in the inter war period (1920-1930)
- INC became a political group
- no dominion status if no one to lead but now there is
- Gandhi and Jinnah became more frustrated with each other - animosity grew - Britain like it divide and rule
- the rising force of Hindu nationalism was tempered by the rising voice of Muslim minority led by Jinnah
was Gandhi’s second satyagraha of non cooperation successful
- there was some initial successes for example around 200 lawyers stopped worked
- however millions of Indians were unwilling or unable to understand the morality underpinning the concept of Satyagraha
- violence broke out at different times in different provinces - led to Chauri Chaura
- in Bombay e.g. a hartal turned into four days of looting and rioting leaving 53 dead and hundreds injured
- satyagraha was spiralling out of control
how did Gandhi’s second satyagraha of civil disobedience and non cooperation lead to Chauri Chaura, how did it start to fail
- non cooperation spiralled out of control
- people started to lose faith in Gandhi due to the lack of progress and started to turn to violence
- In 1921 during some small scale riots around 600 people were killed
- cracks in Hindu Muslim unity began to show
- troops from the Provisional government
what was Chauri Chaura
Feb 1922
- in some small scale riots of 1921, 600 killed - cracks showing in Hindu, Muslim unity
- troops from the provisional government were called in and martial law was once again put in place to restore order
- people started to lose faith in Gandhi due to lack of progress
- ahimsa forgotten by the rebel mobs
- In the town of Chauri Chaura 22 policemen had been burnt and beaten to death - Muslim police officers working for Britain killed by Hindu protestors
- 6th Feb 1922 - Gandhi appealed for INC to demand an end to the 2nd satyagraha
- when violence persisted he fasted in order that the people respect his wishes of ahimsa
- Gandhi didn’t want violence but India were close to winning as Britain were about to give in - perhaps a mistake by Gandhi but he didn’t want to win through violence
why was Gandhi arrested
- for sedition
- Gandhi declared his intention to remove himself from political campaigning to focus on re-generating moral culture of India but was arrested before he could do so
- arrested March 10th 1922
- sentenced to 6 years
- moral high ground to show violence wasn’t the answer, Britain didn’t really know what to do with him
- he only served two years as he got appendicitis and never returned
- return would have put it back in the news and nationalism would rise again - it was also punishment enough
- Gandhi’s arrest was a symbol of pride rather than shame for Gandhi
- symbol of nationalist honour led people to no longer be afraid of British authority
- starts a movement that British brutality like Amritsar can be stifled and non violence stronger as Britain can’t use arms
who took over the INC while Gandhi was in prison
- Molital Nehru and C.R. Das
who is baby nehru and who is daddy nehru
baby - Jawalahal Nehru
daddy - Molital Nehu
what did Gandhi do on his release from prison in 1924
- set up the CWC to formulate INC policy
- he persuaded congress to promote literacy among the masses, improve sanitation and begin a campaign to eradicate untouchability
- saw the importance of educating the Indians so they have the ability to take over should Britain eventually give them power
- feared another Chauri Chaura
what and who were the young hooligans
SUNDRAS CHANDRA BOSE
JAWAHARAL NEHRU
JAYAPRAKESH NARAYAN
- Gandhi worried about them as they differed with his opinions and aims
- charismatic and young members of the INC
- burst onto the political scene demanding purna swaraj, rejected any notion of accepting dominion status
- they were attracted to socialism as Gandhi was deeply conservative he regarded them as radicals
- despite this Nehru became Gandhi’s most trusted and favoured disciple - Nehru gets a lot of support
THEY REJECTED THE NEHRU REPORT
what and when was the Nehru Report
1928
- by Molital Nehru and Tej Sapru (liberal party leader)
- first constitution written by Indians only
- conceived a dominion status for India on the same terms as white self-governed countries within the empire
- manifesto of what a future government of India could look like
- it was very impressive and detailed and had the aim to show Britain they were ready for dominion status
- princely states and British India to be joined in a federation
- no further devolution of power to the provinces
who opposed the Nehru report and who accepted it
- it was endorsed by the INC
- rejected by Jinnah
- rejected by the young hooligans
what was the impact of Jinnah rejecting the Nehru report
it allowed Britain to come back to the argument and tactic of divide and rule
the divide means Britain have to stay