Topic 1 - Road to Independence Flashcards

1
Q

what was the EIC and why were they sent to India?

A
  • privateers and traders not part of government at this point
  • sent in 1600 on December 31st by a royal charter from Queen Victoria
  • told to set up foundations in India, huge costal trading posts, establish LT term trade links
  • India is a gateway to Asia with transport links to Chin and Singapore, key location - Britain’s vessel of getting materials
  • India could be an ally for war
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when did the EIC get power and why was it eventually dissolved

A
  • got power in 1757 ensuing the battle of Plassey
  • lasted until 1858
  • the British Gov was concerned about the power of the EIC and mindful of the problems involved in subduing the Indian Mutiny of 1857
  • passed the government of India act which transferred all EIC powers to the British Crown
  • formed the new British Raj
  • Indians like the Gov of India Act because they didn’t like the EIC - had more respect for the British Raj
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the black hole of Calcutta

A
  • 1756 an uprising took place at Fort William in Calcutta
  • British captured put into a tiny jail where they suffocated in the heat/cramped conditions
  • 123/146 died within hours
  • Britain furious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the battle of Plassey

A
  • 23rd June 1757
  • Robert Clive with the assistance of MirJafar, Nawab of Bengal, defeated the Nawab, Siraj Ud Daulah, and secured Bengal under the control of the EIC
  • set foundation for 200 years of British rule
  • Britain win, Clive declares himself governor of Bengal
  • Britain were furious about the black hole of Calcutta incident
  • EIC now not just traders but in power
  • send a message
  • half of Bengal fight for India
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the Indian Mutiny

A
  • 1857
  • after 4 and 1/2 months British relief arrived
  • one commander alone killed 6000 Indians
  • Taj Mahal made for empress of India, Queen Vic
  • 3000 Britain v 8000 Indians

caused by

  • disrespect
  • exploitations
  • Enfield rifle Indians forced to use when fighting for Britain greased with pig and cow fat against Hindu and Muslim beliefs
  • bluff called/ pretence of rule shattered
  • led to British leaders been viceroy of India and EIC being dissolved under Government of India act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when did Queen Vic become empress of India

A

1877

  • further link Britain and monarchy with India
  • symbol of the empire
  • title had faced opposition from liberals who feared the tile was synonymous with absolutism
  • durbars (celebrations) held in India to celebrate Queen Vic and symbolised conservatism in the new regime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the three government institutions to ensure structure to India’s government

A
  • viceroy
  • secretary and state
  • council of India
  • decided by political appointment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was wrong with the council of India

A
  • based in London
  • 15 men none of whom were Indian
  • had some experience living and working in India but it was often alarmingly out of date and occasionally dangerously inappropriate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the Indian Civil Service

A
  • ensured British laws and rules implemented in India
  • hierarchal in structure - power from crown to local
  • efficient and model administrators
  • had to pass exam in Britain then spend time in India to get on it - needed British Uni time so virtually impossible for Indians to get on it
  • had to deal with a number of tasks
  • 1919 exams could also be taken in India
  • Indians helped administer Raj in other ways like lawyers and policemen but were always answerable to British officer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

discuss the viceroy role

A
  • six years in post and only four in India

- commanded a standing army of 250,000 men only 35,000 British

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the Princley states

A
  • not directly subject to the British Raj
  • in theory the rulers had complete authority - in practice they had treaties with Britain which kept them loyal to the Raj and prevented complete authority
  • their loyalty was important as nationalism grew
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when was the first meeting of the INC

A
  • 1885
  • were mainly high caste elite educated Hindu lawyers who spoke English
  • only 2 muslims
  • not a political group at first
  • their initial goal isn’t to get rid of Britain, want to work with the Raj for power sharing
  • said they represent all
  • met every year until FWW and became a powerful voice for Indian Nationalism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what happened at the first congress

A
  • met for three days
  • congress proclaim loyalty to the British crown and the Raj but express dissatisfaction in how India was ruled
  • agreed on what they wanted:
  • government in India to be broader
  • Indian Civil Service to be opened to Indians
  • Indian’s wealth to be spent on infrastructure not just military
  • end of S.O.S council in Whitehall
  • Britain favoured coast want share of power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when was the Muslim league formed and why

A
  • 1906
  • they felt uncomfortable and underrepresented in the INC umbrella
  • wanted to be the voice for Muslim communities which had minority political rights
  • so long as the ruling elites rules for the people not by the people the Muslim minority not a problem
  • Muslims therefore opposed an extension of democracy (one man one vote) as it would mean few Muslims elected into Gov
  • not necessary if INC truly did represent all
  • Britain was receptive to the appeal of the ML but INC was not - Britain like this as divide and rule - both parties have to agree to force changes from Britain - dichotomy plagued all negotiations between India and Britain ultimately leading to partition
  • Britain ( especially conservatives) favoured Muslims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the alternative name for the Indian Councils Act

A

Morley Minto Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

when and what was the Indian Councils Act

A

1909

  • nationalism grew louder, differences between Hindus and Muslims more apparent, though both groups begin to put pressure on Britain
  • reflective of problems as Indians moved to have more say in their country’s affairs
  • outcome of a series of reforms agreed by S.O.S Lord John Morley and the Viceroy Lord Minto
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are the specifics of the Indian Councils Act of 1909

A
  • 60 Indian reps elected to be on Viceroy’s Council - 27 of which from territorial constituencies and special interest groups - British officials remained in the majority
  • Provincial council enlarged as to create non-official majorities - but their vote was not worth the same as the governor - illusion of power - but first experience of power- training wheels
  • separate electorates provided for Muslims and Hindus to ensure minority of Muslims got a voice in the various councils - 20% of seats reserved for Muslims
  • Morley appointed 2 Indians to his London group and Minto made similar move - first time India involved on daily - but Britain choose so deliberately chose quite westernised yesmen not national Indian activists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when and why did Viceroy Curzon partition Bengal

A

July 1805 in an attempt to curb growing nationalism - separated Muslim East from mainly Hindu West

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

why did Curzon’s partition of Bengal have to be annulled

A
  • It was mainly Muslim country and so when Britain partitioned it they gave most of it to Muslims
  • Hindus outraged - saw it as example of Raj adopting divide and rule policies
  • explosion of discontent
  • partition annulled on 12th December 1911
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what did annulment of the partition of Bengal lead to

A
  • the Muslim league changing its stance on Britain - Britain had favoured Muslims with the partition and now they were revoking that
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what do historians now see the Indian Councils Act of 1909 as

A

a milestone on the path towards colonial self government - it was Indians first say in government even if small and mainly illusionary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what did the FWW directly lead to in India

A
  • rising Indian nationalism
  • friction between nationalists and the British Raj
  • complicated the political situation
  • Indian soldiers fought side by side with British soldiers with strengthened their self-esteem
  • it led to a strong feeling that India deserved some reward for her loyalty to the Raj in the form of Dominion Status
  • Indians thought the war would be a turning point for Indian-Raj relations, it wasn’t
  • Muslims and Hindus joined forces against the Raj as a result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

around the time of the FWW how were Indians influenced by Woodrow Wilson

A

influenced by his championing of self-determination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is the term of why India where so important to Britain and why where they so important

A

jewel in the crown

  • costly to run but outweighed by the economic benefits India brought
  • provider of raw materials/market for British goods
  • Suez canal opened in 1869 which reduced travelling time and cost of transporting food between India and Britain
  • end of 19th century made India subordinate to the needs of the Lancashire cotton industry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

discuss the Lancashire cotton industry situation

A
  • 1879 all import duties on Lancashire cotton cloth removed allowing it to flood the Indian market at a time when the Indian cotton industry desperately needed support and famine stalked the land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Home rule leagues

A

1916

  • 2 nationalist organisations
  • aim of campaigning for home rule of India
  • one by Bal Tilak, one by Annie Besant
  • 60,000 people after 1 year
  • bal Tilaks grew quicker gaining 32,000 only focused in Two regions of a India tho
  • besants slower but across all of country
  • mutually supportive of each other toured together giving lectures and pamphlets - successful in generating agitations amongst the public in a way Congress had never really tried
  • formed mid war - Britain worried people would stop supporting the war effort and they wouldn’t have an army
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What were different opinions on the home rule leagues

A

Congress - maintained reluctance to demand home rules despite home rules popularity - they wanted to work with Raj for dominion status

  • Nehru and Jinnah joined the home rule leagues yet Congress still didn’t want home rule
  • Muslims and lower caste Hindus reluctant to home rule as it would entrench Hindu dominance - thought Britain more protective of their interests
  • British concerned by home rule leagues - finally controlled agitation after re joining Bengal - liked approach of moderate controlled Congress
28
Q

What did the home rule leagues lead to

A

The montagu declaration

29
Q

Lucknow Pact

A

1916

  • agreement between INC and ML
  • covered political objective and details for future electorates
  • plans for future government where they co exist with Britain
  • joined to put pressure on the British Gov
  • the princes didn’t back it
  • masterminded by Jinnah
  • future constitution
  • expected dominion status and now they were not fighting which aided their cause almost complete unity
  • home rule leagues part of this
30
Q

What are the specifics of the Lucknow pact

A
  • no bill would proceed if 75% of the affected community opposed it
  • central legislative council would increase to 150 members of which 1/3 would be Muslim
  • provincial council members can only serve for 5 years
  • defence, foreign affairs and diplomacy would remain in British control
  • Britain saw it as the nationalist movement re uniting and gaining strength and saw it as a threat
31
Q

Reasoning behind the Lucknow pact

A
  • ML saw that annulment of the partition of Bengal in 1911 as an implication that the Raj no longer favoured the Muslim cause
  • the British Empire declared war on Turkey in Nov 1914 and many Muslims resented this decision as they regarded the Sultan of Turkey as their spiritual leader
  • Jinnah worked tirelessly for rapprochement
32
Q

Why could the INC not be in control in 1918

A
  • they’re not a political group yet

- India might deserve power but they were not in a place to receive yet

33
Q

Why did the Montagu Declaration happen

A
  • by 1917 it was clear to Britain that there was no point in postponing political concessions until after the war
  • worried about nationalism uprising especially given Lucknow pact
  • could not ignore the contribution Indians had given during FWW
  • couldn’t ignore rights of self determination inherent in democracy
  • they were losing the war at this point and needed nationalism to be nipped in the bud
  • happened in 1917
34
Q

Why did they have to be careful about what the Montagu Declaration said

A
  • can’t say dominion status
  • could not permit any notion of dismantling the Raj
  • a compromise that granted some form of self government - but no time frame was given it was very vague
  • but Montagu promised to visit India to consider suggestions from representative bodies.
35
Q

Montagu Chelmsford Report

A

1918

  • Montagu toured India to gain opinions from politicians and the public
  • basis for 1919 legislation but events in 1919 sealed the fate - getting in India’s good books was undone by Amritsar
36
Q

What was the Montagu Decleration

A
  • 20th august 1917
    Montagu agreed to meet with Indian Nationalists but it was all fake promises and setting India up for huge disappointment - it was a ST fix
    Some form of self government at some point in the future
37
Q

what are the differences between Chelmsford and Montagu respectively with reference to the Montagu Declaration

A

Chelmsford:

  • tory - imperialist - doesn’t want independent India
  • viceroy

Montagu:

  • liberal - wants independent India
  • Secretary of State
38
Q

what is DOIA (defence of India Act)

A
  • 1915
  • further repressive act just for India - extension of DORA
  • make it illegal to be anti-war, if you were suspected to be could be arrested/prison without trail - lack of human rights - restriction of writing/speech/movement
  • home rule leagues/lucknow and nationalism don’t even exist at this point - it is unnecessary and instead contributes to the rise of nationalism
  • emergency criminal law by Governor General to curtail nationalism/revolutionary activities during FWW
  • foundation for the Rowlatt Acts
  • India was the biggest threat for Britain
  • people were already for the war!
  • the extension of DoIA after FWW in form of Rowlatt Act was opposed unanimously by Indian members of viceroy’s council
39
Q

what is DoRA (Defence of the Realm Act)

A
  • affected all Britain’s empire
  • war time act meaning any land or resources can be requested for war use
  • efficiency act
40
Q

The Rowlatt Commission

A
  • 1917 - Government of India afraid economic/political turbulence creating a potentially dangerous situation for the Raj - coupled with global recession after the war and Spanish flu killing some 13 million Indians - crisis in Raj and crop failure and famine
  • Scottish judge Sidney Rowlatt to investigate revolutionary conspiracies
    July 1918 report - isolated Bengal, Bombay and Punjab as centres of revolutionary activities and recommended old wartime controls (DoIA) be restored
41
Q

what was Britain’s response to problems that ensued the war including their fears about full scale revolution

A

the rowlatt acts

  • resort to the only method they know - repression
  • Britain willing to keep India under the thumb by any means necessary
42
Q

The Rowlatt Acts

A
  • passed March 1919
  • Indians suspected of revolutionary activity could be imprisoned without trial, held indefinitely, be convicted by a court without a jury
  • some Indians on the legislative council resigned including Jinnah
  • they were proved unnecessary/repealed (1922) shortly after their passing but the damage had already been done
  • confirmed Britain had no intention of releasing their imperial grip on India
  • there was a vote for the Rowlatt Acts but the 22 Indians on the council were outvoted and they began to realise they only had the illusion of power/ Britain would never listen
  • Montagu sanctioned the act with extreme reluctance
43
Q

what was the native reaction to the Rowlatt Acts

A
  • opposition to the Rowlatt Acts flared across India especially in Amritsar in Punjab
  • Hartals were organised for 30th March-April 6th 1919 resulting in an impressive display of Hindu-Muslim solidarity and no serious unrest
  • however, the arrest of two protest organisers sparked rioting in which three Europeans were killed
  • British doctor, Marcia Sherwood, was brutally beaten and saved from her certain death by some Hindus who found and treated her
  • Britain lost control of Amritsar
44
Q

what was Governor of Punjab Michael O’Dwyer’s role in the Amritsar Massacre

A
  • he was convinced the rioting in Amritsar was part of a carefully coordinated uprising that might lead to mutiny
  • he feared for his position and life - he wanted to protect himself so called and said ‘regain control of the city’ which is vague and Dyer took to an extreme
  • Dwyer over-reacted by sending in troops to end the rioting
45
Q

why were the Indians in Jallianwala Bagh

A
  • April 13th was Basiskhi Day which was one of the most important religious festival
  • thousands of pilgrims flocked to Amritsar to worship at the Golden Temple
  • arrangements had been made for a political meeting in part of the bagh so that people could voice their opinions and make their feelings be known about the Rowlatt Acts
46
Q

why did Dyer fear trouble and what did he do

A
  • he ordered proclamations to be read at various points in the city warning against the holding of meetings and assemblies and establishing a curfew
  • between 10-20,000 Punajbis ignored the curfew and gathered in the Jallianwala Bagh
  • the political meeting began by passing two resolutions, one calling for the repeal of the Rowlatt Act and the other expressing sympathy with the dead and bereaved in the previous’ days riots
  • without a word of warning, Dyer and a posse of infantrymen appeared in the narrow entrance
47
Q

what happened at the riots on the 10th April

A
  • a mob killed five English men and left a woman for dead - Marcia Sherwood
48
Q

what are the statistics of Amritsar

A
  • fired 1650 rounds of live ammunition
  • 10-15 minutes
  • killing around 400 and wounded 1500
  • just as suddenly as they arrived the troops left
49
Q

what was the British perspective of Amritsar

A
  • British government applied the carrot and stick during the first world war in order to obtain Indian support
  • carrot - dominion status
  • stick - Rowlatt acts
  • it was essentially to quash violent and non violent protests from Nationalists
  • some some Dyer as the brave upholder of the Raj and others thought it secured a secure future of the Raj and Indian nationalists working together
50
Q

was Dyer right in his actions

A
  • was Dyer simply following orders and enforcing the Rowlatt acts
  • he said later - i was going to punish them
  • or been the man on the spot, was he attempting to halt any further trouble from Indian nationalists
  • After the massacre, Dyer was sent back to England to face an inquiry - he was found to have been extreme in actions but there was generally mild approval from Britain
51
Q

what was Gandhi’s response to the Rowlatt Acts

A

30 March 1919 – Gandhi launches a week long Satyagraha in Punjab in response to the Rowlatt Acts. The first key involvement Gandhi has in the module was to coordinate a highly successful Hartal in the business capital of Punjab, Amritsar. The city of Amritsar was filled with British businesses and important headquarters which made it a great place to stage a protest. Gandhi managed to instil his beliefs of peaceful, non-violent protest and convinced workers to abstain from work for seven days.

Gandhi arrested by Britain for planning the protest which causes significant uproar within the city due to its peaceful nature. India had expected reward and gratitude for their war contribution and all they had received was punishment and arrests.

52
Q

what was the Indian reaction to Gandhi been arrested following the hartals he organised in response to the Rowlatt Acts

A

10 April 1919 – Mass riots descend across Punjab in protest towards Gandhi’s arrest. Upwards of 30,000 people take part in the protests which leads to the damage of government buildings, shops and infrastructure throughout the city. There were also 9 deaths of which three were British nationals. A key flashpoint of these riots was the brutal attack on Marcia Sherwood who was a British Volunteer medic. She was not killed and was actually given medical assistance by a group of Hindus yet the British used her attack as an avenue of propaganda to justify their actions. It is these riots which lead to the Governor of Punjab, Michael O’Dwyer to request military assistance to restore order in the province.

53
Q

what was the perspective of the Indian Nationalists on Amritsar

A
  • although Indian nationalists sought an end to British rule they were immediately intent on ending the harshness of the Rowlatt Acts and appeal for fair treatment
  • Amritsar changed everything
  • Gandhi announced that he no longer believed the British had a moral right to rule India and that he was starting a campaign of non-cooperation which he hoped would bring down the Raj
  • The massacre made nationalism hugely popular
  • membership of the INC increased dramatically from under 100,000 in 1918 to over 2 mil in 1921
54
Q

perspective of the neutrals on Amritsar

A
  • president Woodrow Wilson condemned both Dyer’s actions and the British response to it
  • USA championed self-determination and declared that colonies should have the right to decide their own future - Atlantic Charter - went against India of British absolute rule in India
  • European response was muted - France was equally as harsh to its colonial subjects
  • Former British PM Herbert Asquith claimed Amritsar to be one of the worst outrages in British History
  • Rudyard Kipling believed that Dyer saved India
  • In 2013 David Cameron declared the massacre to be a deeply shameful event but that Britain didn’t need to apologise
55
Q

what law ensued Amritsar

A

martial law

  • it was specifically designed for Amritsar and was designed to humiliate the Indians living there
  • any Indian who passed a European had to bow - Salaam
  • public floggings were common
  • the crawling order
  • Dyer decided that any Indian who wished to pass along the street were Marcia Sherwood had been assaulted and left for dead had to crawl on all fours in the muck
  • under martial law everyone was equally bad which went against the Hindu Caste System
  • curfews and restricted travel and vehicles commandeered
56
Q

what was the Hunter Commission

A
  • Montagu pushed ahead with plans for an inquiry into the massacre saying it should be fearless in its approach
  • British and worldwide concern forced the gov to hold enquiry
  • Dyer maintained the situation was British authority been challenged to a concerning extent and the threat to lives of the Europeans justified his actions
  • found to be inexcusable that Dyer did not attempt to prevent the meeting from coming together and he admitted he could have dispersed the crowd without firing
  • some people even claimed the massacre was planned.
  • for moral authority Britain were broken forever, could not longer claim they were ruling with aim of developing civilisation or rule of public law as they didn’t act civilised themselves
  • massacre that destroyed the Raj
  • Dyer would have admitted that he would have used machine guns could he not have got armoured cars
  • began its hearings on October 29th
57
Q

what happened to Dyer after Amritsar

A
  • he was summoned to Dehli and forced to resign
58
Q

Government of India Act 1919

A
  • Montagu and Chelmsford had been working on a report (published July 1918) that fleshed out the Montagu declaration of 1917
    this was the Gov of India act in Dec 1919
  • act created Dyarchy - division although unequal of power between British and Indians
  • act confirmed promise of eventual self government
  • promised a review in 10 years
  • made no reference to independence from Britain any time soon
59
Q

what were the terms of the government of India act 1919

A
  • viceroy to be advised by a council of 6 civilians, 3 of whom had to be India and the Commander of Chief. the viceroy could enforce laws even if legislative councils rejected them and he could choose his own officials
  • the provincial and central legislative were enlarged
  • the provincial councils were given control over Indian education, agriculture, health local-self government and public works
  • the British retained control of military matters, foreign affairs, currency, communications and criminal law
  • the franchise was extended although it was linked to tax payments - after 1919
  • Provincial assemblies could enfranchise women if they so wished and some did but even so the number of women voters remained less than one percent of the adult female population
  • there were ‘reserved’ seats in all provincial legislatures for different religious groups and special interest groups
60
Q

enfranchsie

A

the conditions making people eligible to vote

61
Q

dyarchy

A

government by two independent authorities

62
Q

what was the intention of the 1919 government of India act

A
  • to shift more decision making from the centre to the provinces and to involve more Indians in the government of their own country
  • extension of the Indian councils act of 1909
63
Q

what were the different British perspectives on the government of India act

A
  • Montagu saw the act as a welcome further step towards Indian self government and so did his horrified critics
  • House of Commons - India became a contentious issue
  • right wing members of parliament were convinced the government was losing its nerve and would soon lose India
  • left wing members thought the reforms had not gone far enough
  • members of the Indian Civil Service, concerned about their authority and their mandate to administer India, felt their strength and influence was slipping away - they knew more than anyone else that Britain governed India only by the consent of the Indian people
64
Q

why was the government of India Act of 1919 too little too late

A
  • it had sat in the government for the best part of 17 months without being passed which was a mistake on the behalf of the British because had it been passed earlier it would likely have been regarded as a much better act because the terms were good
  • but it was too little too late after the events that took place at Amritsar
  • moreover it meant there would be more Indians on the councils, but many Indians (including Jinnah) had resigned from the councils due to the Rowlatt Acts and the seats were filled with Indian yesmen which watered down Indian power.
65
Q

what was the enduring significance of Amritsar

A
  • Gandhi called for a Satyagraha - protest of non cooperation with the British
  • Hartal was the best form of non-violent action that the Indians could use but was not necessarily the most effective
  • violent protests did therefore erupt in some provinces especially in Punjab and in Gujurat
  • the British knew that they governed India only by the consent of the Indian people
  • Yet, by the end of 1919 Amritsar and its aftermath had turned thousands of loyal Indians against the raj
  • for many, the true face of British rule had been exposed and the false promises were not to be accepted any longer
66
Q

define hartal

A

a stopage of work usually accompanied by a lock out and used as a political protest

67
Q

how did Gandhi emerge in this early period of 1914-1919

A
  • worked as a lawyer and arrived in India 1914
  • he gradually familiarised himself with Indian politics and proceeded cautiously
  • 1917 intervened in local situations
  • In Bihar satyagraha took the form of his refusal to leave the district; in Gujarat he fasted until the situation was resolved
  • in both these cases the (+) outcome was probably due to other political realignments than his efforts but still impressive
  • during war years he focused on forming relationships with up and coming regional leaders such as Patel and young Jawaharlal Nehru
  • he worked on developing connections with two important communities that had previously been largely neglected by Congress politicians - Muslims and businessmen
  • This paid off hugely - the Muslims supporting his take over of congress in 1920 and businessmen by bank rolling his non cooperation campaign