Topic 4 - Gender Differences in Achievement Flashcards
Girls achievement
External factors
1 The impact of feminism
2 Changes in the family
3 Changes in women’s employment
4 Girls changing attitudes
The impact of feminism
- Feminism has improved women’s rights and opportunities
- MCROBBIEs study compared 1970s magazines emphasising the importance of marriage, to 1990s magazines which portrayed strong independent women
- These changes may affect girls self-image and ambitions, explaining improvements in education
Changes in the family
- Impacted girls attitude towards women e.g., girls may have the role model of strong independent women, to achieve this women need a well paid job and good qualifications
- A rise in divorce rates also suggests to girls it is unwise to rely on their husband as the provider
Changes in women’s employment
- 1970 EPA made it illegal to pay women less than men for the same work
- The promotion of women in paid work has risen from 53% in 1971 to 67% in 2013
- Some women are breaking through the glass ceiling
= Greater career opportunities, better pay, and successful female role models provide an incentive for girls to gain
Girls changing attitudes
- SHARPE interviewed girls in the 1970s and 1990s and saw a shift in how girls see their future:
1974 girls had low expectations, prioritised love, marriage, husbands, children, jobs
1990 girls prioritised their career and being able to support themselves - FULLER found educational success became part of girls identity. They believed in meritocracy and aimed for professional jobs which would enable them to support themselves
- BECK and BECK-GERNSHEIM link this change in attitude to a trend in individualism in todays society, a career is part of a women’s self project promising recognition and economic self sufficiency
A03 Class, gender, and ambition
- There are class differences in how girls ambitions have changed
- REAY limited aspirations of working class girls reflect the limited jobs they perceive as being available to them. Traditional gender identity is seen as attainable and offers status
- Working class girls therefore do not see the point in achieving in education
Internal factors
1 Equal opportunity policies
2 Positive role models in school
3 GCSE and coursework
4 Teacher attention
5 Challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
6 Selection and league tables
Equal opportunity policies
- Feminist ideas have impacted on the education system = reflected in education policy e.g., GIST (Girls into science and technology) and WISE (Women into science and engineering) encourage girls to peruse careers in non-traditions areas
- The introduction of the National Curriculum in 1988 removed one source of gender inequality as boys and girls would have to study mostly the same subjects
- BOALER sees the impact of equal opportunity policies as a key reason for the changes in girls achievement. Barriers to education success have been removed and schooling is more meritocratic
Positive role models in school
- There is now an increase in female teachers and heads, showing women can achieve positions of importance
- To become a teacher the individual must undertake lengthy and successful education herself therefore encouraging educational achievement
GCSE and coursework
- GORARD claims the gender gap in achievement we fairly constant from 1975 to 1989 when there was a sharp increase, this was the year GCSEs and coursework were introduced = concluded that the gender gap is down to change in assessment, not the failing of boys
- Increased use of oral exams, girls have developed language skills
A03 GCSE and coursework
- ELWOOD although coursework may have had some impact it cannot be the only influence on the gender gap because exams have more influence on the final grade
Teacher attention
Teachers interact with boys and girls differently:
- FRANCIS boys were disciplined more harshly and felt picked on by teachers, who had low expectations of them
- SWANN and communication styles: boys dominate whole class discussions whereas girls prefer pair work or group work. Girls are also better at listening and cooperating, they take turns whereas boys interrupt one another
This could explain why teachers respond more positively to girls, this could lead to a SFP, promotion girls self esteem and raise achievement levels
Challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
- The removal of gender stereotypes from learning material has removed a barrier to girls learning
- WEINER claims since the 1980s, teachers have challenged these stereotypes and sexist images have been removed from textbooks. This could have impacted girls achievement by presenting them with more positive images of what women can do
Selection and league tables
- Marketisation has created a more competitive system, in which schools see girls as more desirable recruits because they tend to do better
- JACKSON high achieving girls are attractive to schools, whereas low achieving boys are not = SFP
- SLEE boys are less attractive to better schools because of behaviour difficulties and they’re 4x more likely to be excluded
- As a result boys are seen as liability students
Feminist view on girls’ achievement
- Liberal feminist
- Radical feminist
Liberal feminist view on girls’ achievement
- Celebrate the progress so far in relation to girls’ achievement
- Further progress will be made as a result of equal opportunity policies, encouraging positive role models, and overcoming sexist attitudes
- Similar to functionalism, education is meritocratic
Radical feminists
The system is still patriarchal:
- Sexual harassment of girls at school
- Limits girls subject choices and career options
- Male teachers are still more likely to be heads of secondary skills
- Women are underrepresented in the curriculum
- WEINER secondary school history as a “woman free zone”
Identities, class, and girls achievement
ARCHER identified strategies that girls adopted to create a sense of self:
1 Hyper-heterosexual feminine identify
2 Having a boyfriend
3 Being loud
As a result, working class girls are faced with a dilemma:
- Gain symbolic capital from peers adopting a hyper-heterosexual identity
- Gain educational capital by rejecting working class identities and conform to the schools middle class, respectable, ideal pupil
Hyper-heterosexual feminine identity
- The girls invested time and effort into constructing a feminine identity
- This led to the school “othering” the schools
- BOURDIEU = symbolic violence
- ARCHER ideal female pupil = middle-class and de-sexualised
Having a boyfriend
- Having a boyfriend brought symbolic capital, but gets in the way of school work = lowered aspirations
- Girls wanted to “settle down”, have children, and work locally in working class feminine jobs
Being loud
- Adopting loud, feminine identities
- Outspoken, independent, and assertive
- They didn’t meet the teachers expectations of the “ideal female pupil” = conflict with teacher
A03 Identities, class, and girls achievement
- Working class feminine identities therefore conflict with educational success therefore being a major cause of underachievement