Topic 2 - Class Differences in Achievement (Internal Factors) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Labelling

A
  • INTERACTIONIST
  • To attach meaning or definition to an individual
  • Stereotypical assumptions about their class background: labelling working class pupils negatively and middle class positively
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

BECKER

A
  • Labelling
  • Interviewed 60 Chicago high school teachers, found they judged pupils based on how far they fitted the image of the “idea pupil”
  • Pupils work, appearance, and conduct were key factors influencing teachers judgement.
  • Teachers saw pupils from middle class backgrounds as being the ideal pupil and pupils from working class backgrounds being the furthest away
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Labelling in primary school - RIST

A
  • Labelling occurs right at the the beginning of a child’s education as he studied American Kindergartens
  • Found that teachers used information about a child’s home background and appearance to place them into groups, seating each group at a different table:
  • THE TIGERS fast learners: middle class and clean appearance, seated closest to teacher
  • THE CLOWNS AND THE CARDINALS two groups seated furthest away from her, most likely to be working class, low level books and fewer opportunities to show their ability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

A
  • Prediction that come true simply because it has been made
  • Interactionists argue labelling pupils affects their achievement by creating SFP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SFP process

A

1 Teacher labels pupil, then make predictions based on the label
2 Teacher treats the pupil accordingly, as if the prediction is already true
3 Pupil internalises the expectation which becomes part of their self concept so they because the pupil they are expected to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ROSENTHAL and JACOBSEN

A
  • SFP
  • Study of a school: new test to identify pupils that would spurt ahead, normal IQ test
  • The tested the pupils then picked 20% of them randomly and told the school they were spurters
  • On returning a year later they found 47% of those identified had made significant progress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A03 SFP

A
  • Labelling theory too deterministic: assumes all children that are labelled with fulfil their prophecy and become the label (FULLER)
  • MARXISTS: ignore wider structural inequalities that create the labels and stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Streaming

A
  • Putting children into ability groups
  • Each class is taught separately
  • Studies show SFP are likely to occur when children are streamed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

BECKER (streaming)

A
  • Teachers place working class pupils into lower streams
  • Once a child is streamed it is difficult to move up to higher streams as their teachers have set expectations of them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

GILLBORN and YOUDELL (A-C economy)

A
  • Teachers are less likely to see working class and black pupils as having ability
  • Placed into lower streams = denies opportunity to learn = widens class gap further
  • EDUCATIONAL TRIAGE = those who will pass anyway, borderline C/D pupils, hopeless cases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pupil subcultures

A
  • A group of pupils who share similar values and behaviour patterns
  • Emerge as a response to the way pupils are labelled and in particular as a response to streaming
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LACEY

A
  • Uses concepts of differentiation and polarisation to explain how subcultures in schools emerge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Differentiation

A
  • The process in which teachers categorise pupils according to perceived ability, streaming is a form of this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Polarisation

A
  • Pupils respond to streaming by moving towards one of two opposite poles
  • Led to pro school and anti school subcultures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pro-school subcultures

A
  • Pupils in high streams (largely middle class) tend to remain committed to the values of the school
  • Gain their status from approved channels = academic success
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anti-school subcultures

A
  • Lower streams (largely working class) suffer a loss of self-esteem by being viewed as being inferior
  • Not achieving status through approved channels they opt for alternate ways of gaining status
  • Inverting the rules, get rules from their peers
17
Q

A03 Abolishing streaming

A
  • BALL basis for pupils to polarise into subcultures was largely removed and the influence of the anti-school subculture declined
  • Polarisation disappeared but teachers still differentiated pupils and were more likely to label middle class pupils as ideal
  • Middle class pupils achieve more as they internalised positive beliefs of teachers = SFP
  • WOODS found that pupils responded in 4 ways: ingratiation, ritualism, retreatism, rebellion
18
Q

Ingratiation

A

Being teachers pet

19
Q

Ritualism

A

Going through the motions and staying out of trouble

20
Q

Retreatism

A

Daydreaming and mucking about

21
Q

Rebellion

A

Outright rejection of everything the school stands for

22
Q

Process of labelling

A

Labelling = SFP and streaming = Subculture

23
Q

Pupils class identities and the school

A
  • ARCHER ET AL interactions between social groups and school. Build on work of BOURDIEUs theory of habitus
24
Q

ARCHER

A
  • Argues those who have similar habitus to the teachers receive symbolic capital = status from their teachers as they have the same values of the school
  • Working class students experience symbolic violence = BOURDIEU process in which school withhold symbolic capital for working class students as they see their tastes as being inferior
  • Working class students view education as alien
  • Working class pupils felt society looked down on them = class identities (Nike identities)
25
Q

Nike identities

A
  • Unrealistic: university for richer, posher people, risky and unaffordable
  • Undesirable: would not suit their preferred lifestyle
26
Q

A03 Working class identity and educational success

A
  • INGRAM studied two groups of Catholic boys from a deprived neighbourhood in Belfast (one group from grammar school and the other from the local school)
  • Working class community placed high value on fitting in, grammar boys feeling tension being habitus of working class and middle class culture at school
  • One boy was ridiculed for coming to school in a tracksuit = symbolic violence where pupils are forced to abandon their working class values if they want to succeed
  • Link SUGARMAN
27
Q

Class identity and self exclusion

A
  • EVANS studied a group of working class groups from south London and found they were reluctant to apply to Russell group universities
  • The girls felt a strong attachment to their community
  • Self exclusion from elite universities narrows options for many working class pupils = limits success
28
Q

A03 Class identity and self exclusion

A
  • These studies show a consistent pattern of middle class education system that devalues the experiences and choices of working class pupils and worthless or inappropriate
  • Working class pupils are forced to choice between maintaining their working class identity, or abandoning them and confirming to the middle class habitus of education in order to succeed