TIA Section F - Reinsurance - AAA CE CL Flashcards
How is the URR accounted for in the financials
Offset to the ceded reserve balances
2 major causes of reinsurance uncollectibilitiy:
- Credit Risk
- Dispute Risk
Sources of credit risk:
- Reserving risk
- Market and investment risk (typically not major)
- Accumulation risk
- Pricing/ UW risk
4 potential reasons that disputes may arise
- Losses from policies that the reinsurer was not informed about (missing policies)
- Late notice of a claim
- Settlements made by the insurer without first consulting reinsurer
- Disagreements about the definition of an occurrence
5 other factors that impact reinsurance uncollectibility
- Insurer being too aggressive (or cautious) in presenting claims for reimbursement
- Experience of insurer in processing ceded claims, which may impact the acceptance by reinsurer
- Experience of the reinsurer in handling the claims being presented
- Business relationship between insurerer and reinsurer.
- Commutations: the insurer may agree to a partial collection due to the credit risk
2 main methods to estimate URR (and list whether each reflects credit risk and/or dispute risk)
- Rating-based: use thee financial strength ratings of the reinsurer as the basis. Credit risk only
- Experience-based method: use historical write offs as the basis. Reflects credit & dispute risk
4 factors upon which default rates can be based:
- AM Best Financial Strength Ratings
- Rating agencies
- Historical data of defaults by internal rating
- Transition matrices
4 sources of provision for Dispute risk to be included in Rating based method
- Insurers priorio dispute related reinsurance write offs
- Industry data (if available and relevant)
- Management judgement
- Combination of the above
2 steps to generate an Experience-based URR estimate:
- An experience-based disupte rate could be based on the ratio of historical write-offs to total ceded billed over a multi-year period
- Apply this ratio to the current total ceded balance
Requirement to be able to use an Experience-based URR approach:
The insurer needs to have sufficient credibility in its historical data.
4 potential improvements to an Experience-based method:
- Accounting for write-offs by billing lag year
- Accounting for development of write-offs, which would account for both lag and potential future recoveries off amounts previously written off
- A more granular analysis of write-offs
- Use different experience-based default rates by line of business
Factors that a more granular analysis of write-offs can account for include:
- reinsurance structure
- line of business
- ongoing versus runoff business
- maturity of reinsurance recoverables
- quality of reinsurance purchased over time
- collateral backing reinsurance recoverables
The major challenges of employing an Experience-based method include:
- Data availability:
-The past uncollectible rates may not be indicative of future uncollectible rates if there are changes to the characteristics of reinsurance recoverables
-Historical write-offs could be heavily influenced by individual events such as commutations & reinsurer insolvency - Billing may occur over many years, making it difficult to estimate an ultimate uncollectible rate, and timing of recoveries:
-It is difficult to account for the impact of collateral, as the experience-based methods are typically run at an aggregate level, whereas the collateral applies at an individual insurer level - Some data may require interpretation:
-The historical numbers may be already adjusted to be net out uncollectible balances
-It may be impossible to distinguish between credit and dispute related losses in the historical data