Third parties Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What national third parties ran in all 50 states in 2000?

A

The Reform Party
The Libertarian Party
The Green Party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name two examples of regional third parties?

A

Strom Thurmond’s State’s Rights party founded 1948

George Wallace’s American Independent Party, founded 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name two ideological third parties?

A

Socialist party

Libertarian party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name two issue based third parties?

A

The Prohibition party

The green party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name two permanent third parties?

A

Green Party

Libertarian Party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name two temporary third parties?

A

Reform Party

American Independent Party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the combined popular vote of third parties in 2012?

A

2%

This is tiny- insignificant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In how many of the nine presidential elections between 1968 and 2000 did a third party play a significant role?

A

5 played a significant role ]

3 (1968, 1992 and 2000) it could be argued that a third party decided the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Did third parties make a difference in 2016?

A

no

although narrow victories for Trump led to his electoral college win and enough people voted for third parties in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to change the outcome, it is unlikely that all of these voters would have voted fro Hillary Clinton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did Nader affect the election outcome in 2000?

A

Nader won 2.7% for the Green party (portrayed as extreme), this probably cost Gore the presidency. Nader had name recognition but lacked resources

Florida decided the outcome by 537 votes, in Florida Nader polled 100,000 votes in the state, polling suggests that half of these voters would have voted Gore had Nader not been on the ballot,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who was the third party candidate in 1968? Were they significant?

A

George Wallace of the American Independent Party

racist, regional policy for the South, portrayed as an extremist by the GOP

won 13.5% of the vote, mostly in the Southern states, 45 ECVs, this nearly deadlocked the electoral college- significant

co-optation as Nixon creates the Southern strategy of dog whistle politics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who was the third party candidate in 1992?

A

Ross Perot, won 19% of the vote but 0 ECVs

splits Republican vote so led to a Democrat victory

spent 62 million dollars of his own money as did not qualify for matching funds

his flagship policy of federal budget deficit was co-opted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who was the third party candidate in 1980?

A

John Anderson, National Unity Party, 7% of the vote, took votes from Democrats

had to spend 3 million dollars of his own money to get on the ballot in all 50 states

He was in the Presidential debates but Carter refused to debate him, this made Carter look weak

bad running mate - Patrick Lucey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who was the third party candidate in 1996?

A

Ross Perot again

reform party 9% of the vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why does the Electoral system make things difficult for third parties?

A

FPTP and winner takes all system

votes have to be concentrated

Perot won 19% of the vote but no ECVs shallow support, Wallace won 45 ECVs but only because his support was very concentrated in the south

FPTP is not designed to benefit third parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do matching fund rules disadvantage third party candidates?

A

To qualify for matching funds third party candidates must have won 5% of the popular vote in the previous election. They only get full funding if they get 25% and the main parties get a subsidy for their NNC

This is difficult because:
a) it is difficult to hit 5%, only Perot 1992 and 1996, Anderson 1980 and Wallace 1968 have ever achieved this

b) many third parties are temporary and may only contest one election, e.g. Anderson

These weird rules mean that Perot did not qualify in 1992 when he was attracting 19% of the vote but the predecessor to Perot’s reform party that he created, Pat Buchanan qualified in 2000 when attracting less than 1% of votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do ballot access laws make things difficult for third parties?

A

Third parties are disadvantaged by state ballot laws

different states have different requirements. In Tennessee you have to get 25 signatures on a petition.
In California you have to get signatures equal to 1% of the state electorate.

In 1980 John Anderson estimated he had to gather 1.2 million signatures to get on the ballot in all 50 states, he spent $3 million doing that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does a lack of resources disadvantage third party candidates?

A

People are reluctant to give money to parties that they know will lose

don’t qualify for matching funds so are often reliant on donations or the candidates own money

have to spent cash on just getting on the ballot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does a lack of media coverage disadvantage third party candidates?

A

News programmes often do not think third party candidates to be sufficiently newsworthy

the third parties can not afford the costs of making and airing adverts

Most debates do not allow third party candidate participation.
-in 2000, Nader was excluded from the presidential debates. However, Perot was included.

20
Q

How does a lack of suitable candidates disadvantage third parties?

A

difficult to find running mates

Perot talked of big names like Colin Powell but had to settle for Admiral James Stockdale. He was a no hoper in terms of Washington politics.

21
Q

How do allegations of extremism disadvantage third party candidates?

A

Portrayed as ideological extremists, may be some truth in this as if they weren’t extreme they would probably be running under the Republican Democrat umbrella.

The two parties are broad churches and ‘catch all’ so there is little ‘issue space’ for third party candidates

Republicans smeared pro-segregationist George Wallace as an extremist with slogan ‘if you liked Hitler, you’ll love Wallace.’

Left wing parties such as the socialist party as easy to smear as there is a deep seated fear of the left still leftover from the cold war days.

22
Q

How does co-optation disadvantage third party candidates?

A

If a third party does well in pre-election opinion polls major parties may try to adopt their policies in order to win over their voters. Or if a candidate does well on election day their policies may be taken in the next election.

It happened to Wallace as Nixon adopted the Southern Strategy in the run up to the 1972 election

It happened to Perot when both Democrat President Bill Clinton and the congressional Republicans adopted policies to deal with Perot’s flagship policy- the federal budget deficit. By 2000 the federal budget deficit was in surplus and the Reform party had fallen to just 0.4% of the vote.

23
Q

Why could co-optation be a good thing for third party candidates?

A

depends on their aims

Wallace and Perot probably didn’t think they would win the Presidency but wanted to influence the policy debate- this means they were a massive success

24
Q

How could you argue third parties are insignificant?

A

Two parties dominate elections, congress, state politics

they coopt policys of third party candidates

25
Q

How have independents in the Senate been important?

A

Joe Lieberman took the public option off Obamacare, he was an independent but caucused with Democrats and gave them a filibuster proof majority, this was how he controlled Obamacare

Bernie Sanders, caucused with Democrats and got rewarded with Vet affairs chair position

Angus King, caucuses with the Democrats

Currently two independents in the senate, Joe Lieberman is gone

26
Q

Why was it a good thing to have independent candidates in 2016?

A

two most hated candidates of all time were running, it was a good thing to have different options

(Jill Stein, Gary Johnson)

27
Q

How did Bernie Sanders (ind but was with Democrats for election) change the election?

A

He forced Hillary to shift to the left

she increased her minimum wage pledge

28
Q

How many independents or third parties are in the house?

A

none at all

29
Q

Who is the only third party governor?

A

John Walker of Alaska

30
Q

How much money was spent on advertising alone in the 2008 election?

A

$800 million

Obama raised £1bn for 2012

The main parties have established organisations for their fundraising

31
Q

How was Bernie Sanders rewarded for caucusing with the Democrats?

A

he was made chair of the influential veterans affairs committee

32
Q

In Gallup polls in 2018 what percentage of Americans identified as independents?

A

40%

this means 40% would surely consider third parties

33
Q

How many more votes do third parties receive in districts without straight ticket voting?

A

twice as many

straight ticket voting disadvantages third parties

34
Q

Are third parties significant? Are they destined to fail?

A

very significant but ultimately destined to fail in getting the Presidency

they do not fail if their ambition is to get an issue focus

35
Q

What is a two party system?

A

A party system in which two parties regularly win the vast majority of votes in a general election, regularly capture nearly all the seats in the legislature and alternately control the executive branch of government

the main parties regularly win 95% of votes and all electoral college votes

36
Q

How many states did Evan McMullin run in?

A

only 11

37
Q

does the Democrat party run a candidate against Bernie Sanders in Vermont?

A

NO

38
Q

Who is the only Governor who is not a Democrat or republican?

A

Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, but even he is a former Republican senator

39
Q

Why are there often few protest votes?

A

Protest votes tend to go to third parties

as there are primary elections there tends to be little desire for protest voting as major parties through primaries are responsive to the electorate

40
Q

Since which year have all Presidents been republican or Democrat?

A

1853

41
Q

What number of the state legislatures are controlled by Democrats or republicans?

A

49, only Nebraska is not, this is a nonpartisan legislature

42
Q

Are there any house independents?

A

NO

43
Q

How can you argue that the US doesn’t have a two party system?

A

50 state system, as all state parties are organisationally autonomous and ideologically varied

some states are virtually one party states, where one party wins virtually every election

The USA has a no party system as candidates are often more important than parties, divided govt is frequent

third parties played a significant role in elections in 1968, 1992, 2000

many modern Americans are likely to join movements such as Occupy or the TEA party as opposed to being party members

44
Q

How do parties differ within states?

A

California Democrats are very different to Georgia Democrats

Texas Republican Party, very different from Massachusetts GOP

45
Q

How does the USA break ideas of two party rule?

A

a two party system tends to see parties alternate control but in the USA both parties are often in power at the same time

46
Q

How does FPTP work?

A

The national election is basically 50 state run elections on the same day

47
Q

How many votes did Nader win?

A

Over three million