Theory of mind Flashcards
social cognition
allows us to INTERPRET & RESPOND to social info (communication, written, sharing space & interpretation of thoughts/ action)
Theory of Mind
is a person’s ability to ‘attribute mental states (such as beliefs, desires, intentions, etc.) to [oneself] and other people, as a way of making sense of and predict behavior.’ (Premack & Woodruff, 1978)
mental state?
beliefs, intentions, desires
timeline of ToM development backed up by who?
Astington & Edward, (2010)
12 months? ToM
Kristen et al. (2011) joint attention
- JA may scaffold the later consolidation of ToM
BUT
Shaw et al (2017): independent systems BUT their tasks allowed no verbal or physical connection - unlike real world
2-3 years? ToM - pretense
1) Pretense:
- Jarrold et al. (1994) – lack of relationship BUT task was weird
- Bigham (2010) only included frequency of play & false belief task
- Chan et al. (2016) uses multiple ToM tasks & types of play assessed; found association - results show that the better ToM – better play
2-3 years? ToM - intentions & desires
ToM & intentions = important roles in influencing each other (Karuppali &Bhat, 2011)
- Wellman (1990): when lacking ToM STILL able to predict act
BUT
Broekhof (2015)
- didnt account for the fact the child may add in their own desires
- ASD added in their own desires to predict actions
- can’t appreciate subjectivity of desires
ALSO
- can see when a behaviour happens by accident (i.e. lack of intention) BUT NOT intention from social sharing
4+ TOM
- “Realization of false belief tasks” i.e. sally anne & smarties
criticism of false belief tasks & studies showing otherwise (4)
1) misinterpret the question & Lewis & Osbourne, 1990
2) burden of immature processing skills i.e. memory & reasoning & (Flavell & Miller, 1998)
3) may not be ToM deficit but a language & attentional deficit (Mauchley (2016) & Korkiakangas et al. 2016)
4) more to tasks than ToM 2 year olds have partially ToM
Is ToM universal?
Liu et al. (2008) - chinese vs american meta-analysis = universal
Shahaeian et al (2013) - culturally appropriate smarties task was used = overall ToM skill was universal but constituents of ToM weren’t
AND
Su & Wang (2008) - diff times
Do parent affect ToM?
Talk about cognition was significantly correlated with ToM - Slaughter et al. (2007)
BUT
it isn’t that simply talk of it - maybe maternal sensitivity (Harris 2005)
BUT
Taumoepeau & Ruffman (2006) - accounted for sensitivity & found it was the talk that predicted
Do siblings affect ToM?
Shaheaian (2015) - iranian
- Having sibling or coming from a certain size family = not predictors BUT they dont allow arguments (belief undrstanding)
AND
no. of days spent = significant (quality of play NOT just having siblings, Mizokawa & Komiya (2014)
Why do we need ToM?
1) deception
1) deception Talwar & Lee (2008) BUT Wilson et al. (2003) BUT El Haj et al. (2017)
why do we need ToM? social relationships
1) Slaughter et al. (2015) meta-analysis: more popular = higher ToM (small effect size) *BUT: all lit looks at positive* 2) Hughes & Leekam (2004) - NEG & POS
ToM and bullying
1) Sutton, smith & Swettenham (1999)
- ringleaders have superior
2) Gasser & Keller (2009)
- distinction
3) Dijk et al. (2017)
- motives vs aggression
- different measure
- no difference
4) Shakoor et al. (2012)
- difference in longitudinal
- build up of poor ToM effects