atypical development Flashcards

1
Q

what are developmental disorders?

A

1) Disorder of development that effects learning, communication, motor skills or behaviour
2) Characterised by a particular cognitive profile or pattern of behaviour
* **THEY ARE NOT JUST A DELAY IN NORMAL DEVLEOPMENT they are life long

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

pros & cons of labeling

A

Pros:
- Motivation to overcome
- If undefined = challenge to development
- Undefined may lead to a lack of specialised support
Cons:
- Self- fulfilling prophecy
- Errors in diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

against the phonological deficit theory of dyslexia (2)

A

Castle & friedmann (2014)

  • Dahaene (2009) implies three things:
    1) one type of dyslexia- surface dyslexia
    2) all dyslexics have phono impairment - wrong - based on white et al. (2006) - visual stress (Wilkins et al. 2004) but not a theory per se & can occur in non dyslexics (Singleton, 2005)
    3) phonological impairments cause dyslexia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

against the phonological deficit theory of dyslexia - phonological defs are the cause
- 3 other factors

A

a) motor impairments - Rochelle & Talcott (2006) no control of ADHD–> Brookes et al. (2010) still effect BUT Ramus (2003) not as big as phono defs
b) auditory deficits: training improves (Kujala et al. 2001) BUT placebo effect
BUT only a fraction of dyslexics have this auditory deficit && no reliable relationship between auditory tasks and reading ability – even longitudinally (Share et al. 2002)
c) visual deficits: orthographic inputs may moderate (Vidyasagar & Pammer, 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

for the phonological deficit hypothesis of dyslexia

A

1) dehaene (2009)
2) Snowling (1998)
- . According to this view, dyslexic individuals of all ages display phonological processing problems.
- No consideration of other factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Double deficit hypothesis of dyslexia

who & what?

A

Wolf & Bowers (1999)

Reading impairment caused by deficit in PHONOLOGY AND/OR NAMING SPEED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

evaluation of double deficit - Naming speed & phonological awareness in orthographic consistent languages

A

in ENGLISH:
Kirby et al. (2003): double impairment - longitudinal
Norton et al. (2015) “ neuroimaging

BUT 
in orthographically consistent languages...
Wimmer et al. (2000): no deficits in PA in German only in RN
vs 
Papadopoulos et al. (2009)
- no diff between 2 
BUT 
- used diff ages 

BUT - recently
(McBride-Chang et al. 2012)
- both chinese & english impaired on PA & RN
- others didnt account for morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Specific language impairment (SLI)

what??

A
  • Can be impaired in different types of language: comprehension, production
  • Independent of non-verbal IQ, should have no hearing impairment, oral anatomical difficulty
  • heterogeneous results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

genetic component of SLI

A

Bishop et al. (1995): mono: 86% & Diz 48%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the underlying cognitive deficit of SLI?
- Phonological memory deficit theory
WHAT & WHO

A

Gathercole & Baddeley (1990)

Deficit in the phonological storage in WM may underpin the poor memory performance in SLI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Phonological memory deficit theory in SLI - against

A

Archibald & Gathercole (2007)
- scored worse on nonword task recall = not just STM
a) speech-motor gestures affected by the repetition of multisyllabic nonwords relative to a sequence of simple syllable forms
Vance et al. (2005)
ALSO
SLI isnt all the same
Conti-Ramsden, Crutchley & Botting (1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Procedural deficit hypothesis for SLI

what & who

A

Ullman & Pierpoint, 2005

  • abnormal development in the procedural memory system
  • system = brocas area & basal ganglia (caudate nucleus)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Support for Procedural deficit hypothesis

  • metanalysis
  • neurobio
A

Rechetnikov & Maitra (2009)
- comorbidity of language difficulties & motor impairment

Meister et al. (2003) - TMS

  • hand was excited when reading aloud
  • specific functional connection between motor & language network
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is there a genetic component to motor & language development? (2)

A

Bishop (2002) - twin study

Reader (2014) - GWAS review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is there a social learning component to motor- language association? (2)

A

Iverson (2010):
- motor help acq of language
Language & play –> Orr & Geva (2014) / Smith & Jones (2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Specific Language Impairment – Not So Specific - recap (4)

A
  • motor impairments & lang
  • shared genetic variation
  • networks in social learning
  • comorbid with other impairments
17
Q

Comorbidity of dyslexia & SLI (3)

A
Margari #et al. (2013): expected 
1) Catts (2005)
- best left as 2 disorders
- continually distributed
2) Hulme & Snowling (2016)
- direct comps are sparse bc SLI diagnosis is preschool (speaking) & dyslexia is later (reading)
3) Snowling et al.(2015)
Longitudinal study - found late emerging SLI = risk factor for @ risk dyslexia