Theory content- Lec 1 To Aspherics Flashcards
Exam qs and questions that coudl come up
what is light
part of em sepctrum. stimulates the retina. made up of rays and waefronts. rays represent direction of travel and wavefronts represent the postion the waves have travelled. wave particle duality.
what is refraction and why does light bend what about in curved surfaces
light travels in straight lines in all directions and when it hits medium with diff in refractvie index it changes direction and light slows down as it passes from 1 medium to another. Low to high n or deen it bends towards the normal.
Light bends as photons at the end or in the middle slow down less as the front always touches first and changes direction so may speed up or slow down depending on medium it enters. Air-glass it slows down and glass to air it speeds up.
In curved surfaces the middle touches first and slows down so the curved wave front converges.
Describe positive and negative lenses
Positive lenses are thicker in the middle than at the edge NIDPIC. These magnify and hyperopes focal point is behind the eye and parallel light focuses behind the retina so positive lenses are needed to converge then light and bring them onto the far point of the eye then focussed by the relaxed eye onto the macula.
Neg lenses thicker at the edge. Generally thin. Myopes parallel light is focused in front of the retina in its relaxed state and parallel light from distant objects is diverged by the negative lens and focussed onto the retina. S
What its the second principle focal point
What is vergence
Second principle focal point is the focus point of the far point of the eye. This is where light must be diverging from.
Vergence is the path of curvature of light rays, the more curved it is the greater the vergence. We always get diverging vergence from real objects so negative vergence as light goes from left to right. Object in front of lens.
What is BVP
What is ocular vergence vs ocular refraction
BVP of a lens is given by L2’ when the incident vergence so L1 is 0 so distant objects at infinity. The emerging emergence for a near object is not the bvp.
Ocular vergence is the vergence at the corneal apex
Ocular refraction is the vergence at the corneal apex if the initial vergence is 0
Define the back vertex power in terms of vergence and why do we use bvp and not principle power
Measure of the vergence of wavefronts of light leaving the back surface of the lens when the vergence of the incident light is 0 so the object is at optical infinity.
We use bvp not principle power as we can measure it on a focimeter and can also measure bvd to corneal apex as its an actual point.
Explain in terms of wavefronts how a bi convex lens foccuses light from a distant object and what do we call the value given by the vergence of light emerging from the second surface
Light from distant object means rays are parallel and wavefronts are perpendicular to your rays. Plane wavefront hits front surface of that lens and with a convex lens it means the middle of that plane wavefront will hit the lens first so the light in middle will slow down first and light on edge of wavefront will carry on in air for a little while and will travel faster in the same time period. Wavefronts tell you how far light has travelled in a particular point in time. Wavefront curves inwards or converges as the edge gets further ahead. This carries on till the whole wavefront has passed through the lens= converging wavefront. So air to lens has a higher refractive index n’>n so slows down. Low to high it slows down.
Then its going from the lens to air and n’>n so its now going to lower refractive index high to low which means now once it crosses that boundary the wavefronts will speed up. The edges hit back surface first now and the edges travel faster than the middle of the wavefront in that same time and they get further ahead so the wavefront curves or converges even more. Rays of light perpendicular to the wavefront will focus at a point. So here first the edge ones are going faster as the middle hits and then the edge hits and edge still going faster so if the edge has more time to move ahead= more curved or converging the wavefront will be!
Since we started with a plane wavefront from a distant object, the vergence of the wavefront emerging from the second surface is the back vertex power of the lens.
Define the term ocular refraction, b- why is this not the same as the back vertex power of the corrective spectacle lens worn-
vergence at the corneal apex when we start off with an initial vergence of 0 so object at optical infinity.
The back vertex power of a lens is the vergence of light leaving the back surface of the lens when the initial vergence is 0. The corrective lens sits at its back vertex distance away from the eye, the vergence of light as it travels across this back vertex distance changes as we move closer to or further from the image formed by the lens. So the ocular refraction (K) is not the same as back vertex power. There is a distance between the back vertex and corneal apex and vergence changes as rays travel across that distance.
When would you need to calculate ocular refraction
If a px with a rx of 4.00d or more wants to wear contact lenses as the power needed for a cl would be significantly (+/0.25 or more) different to the power you found in the trial frame due to it sitting on your eye so you need to account for that change in bvd.
Divergent light becomes less divergent as we move away from the lens image so for a minus lens the ocular refraction will be less than the back vertex power of the correcting lens in the trial frame and so the negative power needed in a cl will be less than the refractive result. decrease BVD need less negative. Increase bvd need more negative.
Convergent light becomes more convergent as we are moving towards the lens image so the ocular refraction needed will be more than that of the back vertex power of the corrective plus and the positive power of a cl will need to be increased compared to refractive result. Decrease bvd need more positive. Increase bvd need less positive.
Why is it only necessary to measure the back vertex distance for Rxs over 4.00D?
For low prescriptions the vergence of light leaving the back surface will be low and the back vertex focal length will be longer than for higher power lenses. Up to powers of 4.00D any change in the back vertex distance is negligible compared with focal length and the change in vergence will be small compared to the 0.25D steps by which we can change any prescription. The vergence at the back vertex and the vergence at the ocular surface will be the same if we round to the nearest 0.25D. 4.00D and more, there will be more of a difference in vergence as you travel over that back vertex distance.
Define the far point of the eye
Point light must be diverging from or converging to to allow the relaxed eye to focus the light onto the retina. (If the light incident on the corneal apex is to focus onto the retina when the eye is in its relaxed state, no accomodation
3) Explain why positive lenses are thicker in the centre than they are at the edge?
4) Where would you find the far point of a myopic eye?
3) Explain why positive lenses are thicker in the centre than they are at the edge?
Positive lenses are thicker in the centre because the front surfaces are more curved than the back surfaces which means the lens surfaces will meet at the edges.
4) Where would you find the far point of a myopic eye?
the far point of a myopic eye is in front of the eye and closer than optical infinity.
Describe what prisms do
How can the effect be cancelled out
How can prisms be induced
Prisms bend the light towards the base but they appear as if they are bent towards the apex. So light moves towards the bsae but image moves towards the apex.
Prisms cause the eyes or rotate towards the prism apex. Optical centre is the point on a lens with no prismatic effect.
Horizontal is in and out. HSA VSS vertical up and down. Differential horizontal prism power is power and base but vertical is eye as well.
2)Prismatic effect could be cancelled out if light is still going parallel in the same direction. If different directions then the eyes have to rotate to fix this.
3) prisms can be induced by moving the oc away from the visual axis= induced prism. Or by tilting one lens surface relative to the other to get worked prism.
Prisms can sometimes be wanted proscribed prism control or cosmetic thinning or unwanted due to poorly centred lens or fitted specs. Or NVP in multifocals.
combining prism in the sa,e lens and separate lenses
In same lens same base direction so light bends more in that direction and we get additive effect
Opposite base directions light bends in opp directions so effect decreases es or cancels out depending on amount of pris,
Vertical again same thing- same base direc light will bend towards the base more but look as if its from apex.
In separate lenses- differential prism HSA VSS
To move ocs out by 1.5cm for each lens is this practical? What other way could we get to required prism
No as this would require a larger blank size and add to the overall thickness of the lens. The lens would be especially thick at the temporal edge, it will be much closer to the optical centre and positive lenses get thicker towards the oc. It would be better to use a semi finished lens and work prism onto the back surface along with the final rx.
What is presbyopia explain accomodation,
Emmetrope eye distant object describe the lens and for a near object and presbyopes
Presbyopia- makes the human eye an increasingly focus system and amp of accom decreases with advancing age. Fixed focus so accom reduced, even with no accomodation the eye still has some depth of focus due to small apertures of the eyes which allows us to focus a little closer than infinity.
Emmetropes or corrected ametropia eye for distant objects- ciliary lens is relaxed
Near object- lens fatter and rounder and converges onto retina
Presbyopes- lens cannot change shape cant converge or accom so cant refocus that image onto the retina so need extra add or positive power.
Problem is if too much positive power then focuses in front of retina= pseudo myope then blurry. Ignore cyls as add is a spherical correction
Different segment types and development of bifs
Segments are always positive
Down curve/round
D-seg (d28 most common)
E style
C segment- curved top
First distance and near lens chopped in half and stuck together as split bifocal
Cement bifs add portion stuck onto distance
Fused bifs- made of glass smooth fusion between distance and near
Solid bifocals- glass or plastic segment worked onto lens, only round and difficult to manfuacture
Seamless bifocals- edge of lens blended into lens but aberrations
E-seg- large reading area
We want good optics and wearer is looking through oc of d and n= split bifocal. All other lens designs compromise split we can use best form lenses for both but lenses can fall out. Cosmetically seamless is nice and round fused then solid round etc but optically split and e style are the best when they look the worst. Round and seamless worst.
Where is the nvp always
Always down a down and in as thats where the segment is. Segment displaced inwards slightly as we converge so we wan to look directly above the segment centre. Inset is a standard 2-2.5mm but not everyone converges by the age amount.
Can alter inset by moving oc in distance portion
NVP
Point where the eye converges and drops down to read
ON= near optical centre where prism often cancels out. Sometimes it doesnt exist and if its further from the NVP then we are looking more off axis and we get more aberrations. NVP and ON do not coincide in most multifocals and its not always a real point. Oc of combined distance and near segment.
problems with bifs
Poor control of near optical centration= depends on Rx, segment type which controls the amount of prism at nvp
Sudden change in image position (image jump) particularly in round segs. This can be eliminated in vertical directions by suitable segment choice or working base up prism onto segment but not laterally.
Poor va in segment= potential problem in fused due to wavy interface between lens material bc of induced prism
Monochromatic and chromatic aberrations in segment depends on rx and lens segment cannot control independently. Colour fringes at BVP when going for high index lenses generally.
Base direction in a d segs- on pg 12 of my notes. What would the base direction be if nvp was em below and 7mm below.
Radius of bottom half of segment is 19 depth is 24 which is the overall size of the segment. 24-19 means the segment centre is 5mm below the top.
3mm down= would be looking above the segment centre so positive lens so base down
7mm-= looking below segment centre which means a base up
Look at position of the NVP to see base direction
Bifocal jump and how to eliminate
Just past segment divide. Sudden introduction of prism at the segment top and the image jumps and eye has to refixate on the image. From distant to near and its hidden till the wearer moves their head. Used to it.
Distance from seg top to seg centre times the add. In round or downcurve this distance is the same as the radius.
Jump is independent of the distance rx, only the add. Can be avoided or eliminated by working the prism onto the segment that is equal and opposite to the jump or by having a smaller radius as the segment centre is closer to the segment top so less jump.
Jump for each segment
Jump at dividing line for round segs is always base down. For negative rxs they add to the base down induced by the distance portion at the nvp so there is more jump then d segs and image quality at nvp is poorer.
D28- usually base down unless the radius is equal to the depth in which case there is no jump
E seg- no jump if the OD and ON lie on a straight line as no prismatic effect at segment top so no sudden change in overall prism. (Seg centre can be on segment divide so base up at nvp can be cancelled out by base down due to distance)
Semi-circular seg- no jump as centre of segment at segment to
Bifocal problems tca
High index means lower v values means higher tca
Larger degree of prism at nvp= high tca
Average value before tca is noticeable= 0.1 dioptres
Solid bifs. Tca= prismatic effect at NVP/ constringence value
Fused bifs- tca must be calculated for 3 components distance recess curve and the high index segment and then added.
Bifocal fitting
Measuring bifocal adds
What does 4-250 mean in plastic c seg
Segment top level with lower limbus and lower if px finds seg top too noticeable. Some say 2mm below for d segs. Metal frames adjust heights, may prefer seg top higher if close working demands or lower if occasional near work.
If segment on rear of lens- measure BVP at distance and near and then add is Fnear-F distance. Measure on back. On surface that the segment is on.
If segment on front of lens measure FVP at distance and near and do the same but measured on the front. But distance power is always specified as bvp.
Front surface is +4.00 on a lens measure and the add is +2.50D. Rear surfaced w required sphere or toroidal curve required to get rx. Prisms may be added at this stage. Front normally done and thickness and everything added to back.
1)Why can’t bifocal and progressive lenses be supplied as finished lenses for astigmatic rxs?
Bifocal you have a segment which has to be in a particular position, finished lens means they’re both finished. Astigmatic position means you need your cyl power at an axis which means you would have to rotate the lens to get the cyl in the correct axis, and if you have seg or reading area in the correct position and you move the lens for the cyl it wont be in the right place anymore. Thats why varis and bifocals come as semi-finished the front surface has the bifocal or progression on it and then glazing house surface the back surface with the correct powers at the correct axis to give the final rx. It would also not be practical to store lenses with all cyl powers for all axes.
2) Why cant you provide prescribed prism by displacing the lens in a multi focal or pal?
it would displace lens and reading area to different position. The inset for bifocals and varis is set at about 2 or 2.5mm. If the lens is displaced to induce prescribed prism, the segment or progression would not be in the correct position and the wearer would not be looking through the centre of the segment or progression when they converge for near.
1)Explain why the near vision point and the near optical centre often do not coincide?
The near vision point is the point through which the wearer looks when reading whereas near optical centre is the point where there is no induced prism when the distance portion and the near point are combined for a bifocal- point where if induced prism caused by distance is cancelled out due to induced prism at the segment which will mean the near optical centre.
Dont often coincide as the near vision point is often not the point where they both cancel each other out. They will only coincide if the induced prism due to the segment is equal and opposite due to the induced prism due to the distance portion at the near vision point. This can only occur for positive rxs and round segments or low negative rxs and d segments unless prism control is used.
2) Dr L 46 has noticed she cannot read in her specs anymore. Rx of -1.50/-0.25x90 and L= -1.00/-0.50 x 95. Add= 1.25
she wants something which allows her to see in distance and near at same time she wants bifs as her husband had problems with varis. Occupation= university lecturer and hobbies include reading. Discuss her options including type of segment and advantages and disadvantages of each.
B)Will the px be comfortable using her computer screen with bifocals, other options other than bifocals?
Explain she might get on well with varifocals, persuade her to use varis firstly range of wd etc.
D-seg- most commonly used. D28- they are more noticeable than round segments, for negative rxs the base up due to the segment at the NVP cancels out some of the base down prism induced by the distance portion at the NVP. = less induced prism at the NVP.
Round segments- less noticeable than d segs- generally give more reading area, for negative rxs they add to the base down prism induced by the distance portion at the NVP , more jump than D-segs. more prism=looking further away from oc= more off axis aberrations, image quality at NVP= poorer.
E-style- largest reading area, most noticeable dividing line so cosmetically the worst, segment centre can be on segment divide so base up at the NVP cancels out base down due to distance. As the segment centre is on the segment divide there will be no jump.
B) with a +1.25 add she will still be able to see 80cm away so she should be able to see her screen through the bifocal segment but she may also have enough accomodation to see it through the distance portion depending on how far she works from the screen. She may get asthenopic sxs if she needs to accom for long periods.
if she views the screen through the segment it may be uncomfortable as she may have to tilt her head back. So screen position. You could prescribe her single vision rx for long periods of screen work- but in this case unlikely to be needed and in fact if she removed her specs she will be able to read and probably see screen clearly.
Average sphere in the right= -1.50-0.125= -1.625D and far point= 1/1.624= 0.615= 61.5cm working distance. Left- average sphere is 1.00-0.25= -1.25 far point= 1/1.25= 80cm.
3) Plastic 25 segment curve top solid bifocal. Distance power is approx Plano in this form. 4-2.50= +4.00 on lens measure and add is +2.50D. For the above semi finished lens if you assume this is a thin lens what would the back surface power be if the back vertex power is Plano.
2.Clearly this is not a thin lens and your value calculated in Q1 is only an approx, how would you need to adjust the back surface power to account for the lens thickness and why.
3. If the required final rx is -4.00D the minimum centre thickness required is 1.5mm and the refractive index is 1,5 what radius of curvature would need to be surfaced onto the back surface.
Thin lens just add front and back vertex together to get answer. Fv’= F1+F2= 0=+4.00+F2… F2= -4.00D
- The thickness of the lens contributes some positive power since the convergences of light increases as it passes from the front to back surface. Light hitting the back surfaces will have a vergence of greater than +4.00 which means back surface power would need to be more negative than -4.00D as a result. So its positive which means its converging so it adds more positive power so if the front surface is now more positive the back surface would need to be more negative. Rays would meet behind front surface.
- F1= +4.00D, t=0.015m n=1.5 and Fv’= -4.00D
use step along or the back vertex power equation to work out F2 and then use r= (n-n’)/F to work out the radius of curvature.
Explain difference between worked prism and induced prism
Worked prism= back surface is tilted relative to the front surface so the optical centre is shifted. Rays perpendicular to the front surface but not the back surface.
Induced prism= whole lens is shifted so no longer looking through oc and the rays are not perpendicular to either surface.
Differential prism in anisometropia how to work out prism (differential prism)
Interested in vertical because the distance from OD to NVP is greater in vertical than horizontal meridian as eyes converge smaller distance but look down more and also eyes can cope w horizontal rather then vertical.
So work out prism due to distance portion, forget prism due to the segment as long as it’s the same segment for each lens so same segment top, size addition which is mainly always the same. When working out diff prism just do it based on distance rather than due to the segment. So differential prism is independent of segment as long as the segment is same up both.
Conventional bifocals vs prism control bifocals
Conventional- same prism at distance and near- conventional bifs, makes life easier for glazing houses. Can work it on back surface or displace the lens. N
Prism at distance only or near only or different prism at distance and near= prism control bifs
Uses of prism controlled bifs and examples of prism controlled bifs
Neutralise prism at NVP= centre controlled bifs (moving oc to nvp)
Induce base in prism due to poorly controlled exophoria or convergence insufficiency
Eliminate differential prism induced at the NVP
No jump bifocals= segment OC on the segment dividing line
Franklin split bif- lens split in half like an e seg. Base in prism at near only due to differential prism
Presto bifocal segment is glued onto hole cut in distance lens. Better cosmetically than franklin split.
Inset what can changing it do
Changing the inset can change the prismatic effect
Generally set at 2mm for bifs by lens manufac. can increase it to induce base in at near -horizontally.
Inset-convergence times add which is the extra bit of prism induced due to segment
Also have to take prism due to distance into account
Summary ab bifs
Round or downcurve seg= increase bd prism larger eg= greater the prism
More prism more aberrations
Round= greater jump compared to D but less visible than d
E largest reading area and if you put seg centre on dividing line it induces base in prism. more visible no jump if OD and ON lie on a straight line.