Theories Of The Family Flashcards
The functionalist perspective on family
The function of belief of society
Functionless believe that society is based on a set of shared norms and values where society socialises its members. This enables them to corporate harmoniously to meet societies needs and achieved shared goals.
The functionalist perspective on family
How society is made up
Functionalists regards society as a system made up of different parts that depend on each other, such as the family, the education, system and economy.
The functionalist perspective on family
Society like a human body
Functionalist compare society to biological organisms like the body. just as organs perform functions, vital to the well-being of the body, families meet the societies essential needs such as need to socialise children.
The functionalist perspective on education
George, Peter Murdoch
essential functions needed for society
-Stable satisfaction of the sex drive with the same partner
- reproduction of the next generation
-Socialisation of the young
-Meeting members economic needs such as food.
The functionalist perspective on family
Criticisms to Murdock
Some doubt that the four functions developed by Murdock are the most important, and some argue that they could be performed quickly by other institutions, or by non-nuclear families.
The functionalist perspective on family
Criticism to Murdoch
Marxist
Marxist argue that families meet the needs of capitalism, not the needs of family members or society.
The functionalist perspective on family
Criticism to Murdoch
Feminists
Feminist, see the family are serving the needs of men and oppressing women.
The functionalist perspective on family
Criticism of Murdoch
Marxist and feminists
Marxist and feminist reject Murdochs rose tinted harmonious consensus view that the family meets the needs of society and the members of the family. They argue that functionalism neglects conflict and exploitation.
The functionalist perspective on the family
Parsons 1955
functional fit theory
In the view of Parsons, the functions that the family performs will depend on the kind of society in which it is found. The functions that the family has to perform or affect its shape or structure.
Functionalist perspective on family
Parsons “functional fit” theory
The 2 kinds of family structure
- The nuclear family of just parents and their dependent children
- The extended family of three generations living under one roof
The particular structure and functions of a given family type will fit the needs of the society in which it is found .
The functionalist perspective on family
Parsons functional fit theory
2 types of society
The nuclear family fits the needs of industrial society while the extended family fits the needs of pre-industrial society. When Britain became industrialised, the extended family began to give away to the nuclear.
Functionalist perspective on family
A geographically, mobile workforce
Preindustrial society
In the traditional pre-industrial society, people often spent their whole lives living in the same village working on the same farm.
Functionalist perspective on family
A geographically, mobiles workforce
Modern industrial society
In modern society, industries spring up and decline in different parts of the country, and this requires people to move to where the jobs are. Parsons argues that it is easier for the nuclear family to move and better fitted to the needs of modern industrial workforce
Functionalist perspective on family
Socially mobile workforce
Modern industrial society
based on constantly evolving science and technology, so requires a skilled competent workforce. An individual status is achieved by their own efforts and ability. The nuclear family is better equipped to meet the needs of industrial Society.
The functionalist perspective on family
A socially mobile workforce
Extended family and modern society
In the extended family, adult sons may live home with their fathers who have a higher status as the head of the house. However, the Son may have a highest achieved status in a job. this may inevitably give rise to tensions and conflict. The solution is for the son to move out and form his own nuclear family, which encourages social mobility.
Functionalist perspective on education
A socially mobile workforce
The result of mobile nuclear families
This is where nuclear families are structurally isolated from their relatives. They may keep in touch, but have no binding obligation towards them. And are unable to help one another as much as extended families
Functionalist perspective and family
Loss of functions
Pre-industrial family as multifunctional
The pre-industrial family was a multifunctional unit. It had a unit of production and a unit of consumption (feeding). It was more self-sufficient than the modern nuclear family and provided for its members, health and welfare.
Functionalist perspective on family
Loss of functions
Extended families as society industrialises
When society industrialises the family loses its structure and function. The family to be a unit of production as work moves into factories. It also loses functions to other institutions such as schools and health service.
Functionalist perspective on family
Loss of functions
The result of the loss of functions
As a result of the loss of functions the modern nuclear family comes to specialise in performing two essential functions the primary socialisation of the children and stabilisation of adult personalities
The functionalist perspective on family
Loss of functions
The two essential functions of the modern nuclear family
Primary socialisation of children
Primary socialisation of the children to equip them with basic skills and societies values to enable them to cooperate with others
The functionalist perspective on family
Loss of functions
The two essential functions of the modern nuclear family
The stabilisation of adult personalities
The family is a place where adults can relax and release tensions, enabling them to return to the workplace, professed and ready to meet its demands.
Functionalist perspective on family
Evidence against Parsons
Was the industrial family dominant in pre-industrial society?
Wilma and Young, 1973
According to young and Wilmot, the pre-industrial family was nuclear, not extended as Parsons claims with parents and children working together, for example, in cottage industries such as weaving.
Functionalist perspective on family
Evidence against Parsons
Was the industrial family dominant in pre-industrial society?
Peter, Laslett, 1972
From his study of English household from 1564 to 1821, he found that they were almost always nuclear families. The short life expectancy meant that grandparents were unlikely to be alive for very long after the birth of their first grandchild.
Functionalist perspective on family
Evidence against Parsons
Did the family become nuclear and early industrial society?
Wilmot and young
Wilmet and Young argue that the early industrial period, gave the rise to the “Mum centred” working class extended family based on ties between mothers and their married daughters, who relied on each other for financial and emotional support
Functionalist perspective on family
Evidence against Parsons
Is the extended family no longer important in the modern society
Wilmot and Young
Willmot and Young argue that from 1900 the nuclear family emerged as a result of social changes like higher standards of living that made the extended family less important.
The Marxist perspective on family
Marxist institutions such as education and family is helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism, the functions of the family are performed, purely for the benefit of the capitalist system.
The Marxist perspective on family
Inheritance of property
Mode of production
The key factor determining the shape of all social institutions is the mode of production, this is who owns and control societies productive forces. Modern society It is a capitalist class that owns and controls the means of production.
The Marxist perspective on the family
Inheritance of property
The classless society
Marxists called the earliest class society, “primitive communism”. There were no private property, and all members of society own the means of production communally.
The Marxist perspective on family
Inheritance of property
Classless Society and Frederick Engle
During classless society, there were no family as such. Instead, there existed, what Frederick calls the promiscuous horde or tribe in which there were no restrictions on sexual relationships.
The Marxist perspective on the family
Private property
The growth of society wealth
As the forces of production developed, societies wealth increased as well as the development of private property. a class of men emerged who were able to secure control of the means of production, brought the patriarchal monogamous nuclear family
The Marxist perspective on families
Private property
Frederick Engle, monogamy
Monogamy became essential because of the inheritance of private property. Men had to be certain of the paternity of their children in order to assume that their legitimate as inherited from them.