Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Relationships Paper 3 > Theories of Romantic relationships > Flashcards

Theories of Romantic relationships Flashcards

1
Q

4 theories of Romantic relationships?

A
  1. Social exchange theory
  2. Equity theory
  3. Rusbult’s investment model of commitment
  4. Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where can these theories apply to?

A
  • friendships, work colleagues
  • formation, maintenance & breakdown of a relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is social exchange theory & who proposed it?

A
  • Thibault & Kelly (1959)
  • suggests behaviours in relationships reflects economic theories
  • proposes relationships involve exchanging resources
  • benefits vs costs of a relationship
  • individuals will try to maximise the benefits & minimise costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How will someone calculate the outcome of a relationship?
when is the relationship likely to break down using the calculation?

A
  • using cost-benefit analysis
    Outcome = Rewards - Costs
  • relationship starts costing more than it benefits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What 2 elements are used to measure the benefits in a relationship?

A
  1. comparison level: comparison of previous r’ships to the current one
  2. Comparison level to alternatives: other potential r’ships to see if they offer more benefits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social exchange theory 4 stages of development made by Thibault & Kelly 1959?

A
  1. Sampling stage: benefits & costs are assessed in a number of r’ships
  2. Bargaining stage: benefits & costs identified in the r’ship
  3. Commitment stage: benefits/costs become predictable as r’ship develops
  4. Institutionalisation stage: interactions become predictable & coupls ‘settles down’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO3 social exchange
Research support Rasbult & Martz?

A

P - Rasbult & Martz research support
E - applied SET to women in abusvie relationships
- women would tend to go back into abusive relationships, briefly leaving because there was no better alternative (comparison level)
E - Suggested women would prefer to be with an abusive partner than be by themselves as the abusive r’ship offered benefits in some form
L - support SET theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AO3 social exchange
Research support Hatfield?

A

P - Hatfield research support
E - Found partners who under benefitted in a r’ship were angry & felt deprived
- whereas those who over benefitted felt guilty & uncomfortable
E suggests an equilibrium is required for r’ship to be effective
L - SET has practical benefits if practiced for people’s general wellbeing in a r’ship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AO3 social exchange
SET is socially sensitive?

A

P - SET is socially sensitive due to the negativity of the theory
E - By basing relationships on the notion that humans are selfish & a relationship revolves around economies (cost v.s. benefits) causes a negative outlook
E - Could cause people with different r’ship views to fear involving themeslves in a r’ship if they’re being judged by their benefit/cost rather than them individually
L - SET socially sensitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AO3 social exchange
Practical application?
(ICBT)
(Chrisetnsen 2004)

A

P - Useful practical application
E - Integrated Behavioural Couples Therapy (IBCT) where partners are encouraged to increase positive exchanges & decrease negative exchanges, by changing negative behaviour patterns
E - Christensen 2004 found 2/3 of couples that used ICBT reported their r’ship had improved
L - shows SET can be used to help couples showing its real world application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is equity theory?
Who came up with it?
What theory did it refine?

A
  • equity theory is based on fairness (equity) not necessarily equality
  • made by Walster refining SET
  • individuals become dissatisfied with r’ships if they feel they’re unfair (inequity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In equity theory when is a r’ship likely to end?

A
  • if a partner feels they are over benefitting/under benefitting as the r’ship is inequitable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain perceived ratios of inputs & outputs (equity & equality)?

A
  • inequity doesn’t mean inequality - two people can put in different amounts & still have equity
  • person will hold subjective views on relative inputs & outputs of themselves & their partner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s the difference between SET & Equity theory?

A
  • SET is about maximising the profits of a relationship & equity theory is about fairness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In relation to equity theory:
Profit?
Distribution?
Dissatisfaction?
Realignment?

A
  • Benefit (usually financial) that should be equal minus the costs
  • ET focused on determining whether distribution of resources is fair
  • Perceptions of inequity are associated with dissatisfaction
  • More unfair the r’ship feels the harder the partner will work to restore equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AO3 Equity theory
Research support Dainton?
(link perceived low equity & low satisfaction)

A

P - Research support Dainton
E - Found there was a link between perceived low equity & lowered satisfaction
- 219 Pt’s showed motivation to return to equity increasing the chances of relationship success
E - Indicates equity plays a major role in the maintenance of a r’ship
L - So, the theory has some clout in describing what processes maintain a r’ship

17
Q

AO3 Equity theory
Individual differences that limit credibility?
(Huseman 1987)
(Benevolents & Entitleds)

A

P - Individual differences limit the credibility of ET
E - e.g. not all partners in r’ships are concerned with achieving equity
E - Huseman 1987 suggested some people are less sensitive to ET than other & are separated into two groups of people: Benevolents & Entitleds)
L - suggests ET cannot be applicable to every couple as its relative

18
Q

AO3 Equity theory
Cultural differences?

A

P - ET cannot apply to all cultures
E - Couples from other cultures (where groups needs is above the individual) were more satisfied when over benefitting than those in individualistic cultures (where needs of the individual is above the group)
E - some cultures have beliefs that one member of the r’ship should benefit more e.g. in a traditional nuclear family the man works & the female is a housewife
L - Not all cultures could adopt Equity theory because of their cultural practices & norms

19
Q

What is Rusbult’s investment model of commitment theory?

what is the model?

A
  • expanded on SET by adding in the impact investment has on commitment in a relationship

satisfaction
alternatives – commitment = stay/leave
investments

20
Q

Rusbult suggests commitment depends on 3 factors?

A
  1. Satisfaction: To what degree does the partner meet your needs
  2. Comparison with alternatives
  3. Investment size: The longer the relationship lasts the more the partners would have invested (ending the r’ship at this point would be pointless)
21
Q

5 maintenance behaviours in Rusbults investment model of commitment?

A
  1. ACCOMMODATION of your partner
  2. WILLINGNESS TO SACRIFICE for the cause of the r’ship
  3. FORGIVENESS to resolve a problem
  4. POSITIVE ILLUSIONS form of self-deception to look for positives in themselves/partner
  5. RIDICULING ALTERNATIVES any potential partners to be viewed as worse than their current partner
22
Q

AO3 Rusbult model
Lin & Rusbult?

A

P - Research support Lin & Rusbult
E - Found females generally reported higher satisfaction levels, poorer scores for alternatives, but greater investment scores & commitment overall
E - supports idea that there a gender differences but also backs up previous research theories on evolutionary aspects of relationships
L - shows Rusbult investment model is credible

23
Q

AO3 Rusbult model
Theoretical issues?
(Goodfriend & Agnew 2008)

A

P - Theoretical issues with Rusbult
E - Theory is an oversimplified idea of investment, Goodfriend & Agnew argue that it is not just things we bring to the table as investments but also a couple’s plan for the future
E - Partners will be committed to staying in r’ship because they want to see the future planned
L - Shows investment is more comprehensive than what the theory proposes making the investment model reductionist

24
Q

AO3 Rusbult model
Practical application?
(Explanation for why people stay in abusive relationships)
(Rusbultz & Martz)

A

P - Investment model provides an explanation for why people stay in abusive r’ships
E - According to the model if a partner feels their investments will be lost if they leave they are more likely to stay in a r’ship even if the costs are high
E - Rusbult & Martz in their ‘battered women’ study found women would return to an abusive partner if they had invested in it & there were no alternatives
L - shows investment model ca be applied to different relationship scenarios that ET & SET fail to explain, thus increasing IMC to everyday society

25
Q

Duck proposed there are 3 major types of relationship breakdown?

A
  1. Pre-existing doom
  2. Mechanical failure
  3. Sudden death
26
Q

Duck proposed 5 minor reasons which contribute to relationship breakdown?

A
  1. Intrapsychic
  2. Dyadic
  3. Social
  4. Grave dressing
  5. Resurrection phase
27
Q

Explain Intrapsychic phase?
6 things

A
  • Focus on partners behaviour
  • Assess the adequacy of partners performance
  • Focus on negative aspects of relationship
  • consider costs of breaking up
  • assess the benefits
  • private dilemma of whether to raise the issues or not
28
Q

Explain Dyadic phase?
4 things

A
  • Confront partner over inadequacies
  • Negotiation of future behaviour
  • Possible attempt to repair problems
  • Both assess the costs of withdrawing from r’ship
29
Q

Explain Social phase?
4 things

A
  • Negotiate post-relationship dynamic
  • Gossip in friendship/family circles
  • Face-saving stories are created in case of breakup (blame partner)
  • Consideration of the social backlash of r’ship breakdown
30
Q

Explain Grave Dressing?
3 things

A
  • Perform ‘getting over it’ activities
  • Becomes retrospective about the r’ship
  • Publicly give own version of breakup
31
Q

Explain Resurrection phase (added in 2006)?

A
  • reconfiguring oneself for future r’ships, showing personal growth
32
Q

AO3 Duck’s theory
Evidence to support Tashiro & Frasier 2003?

A

P - Research support for Duck
E - Tashiro & Frasier 2003 showed viewing the situation holistically rather than through one’s own faults can help people see the relationship breakdown in a positive light, as Duck’s model predicts
E - Strengthens the claims made by the model & highlights the application of the theory to everyday r’ships
L - Should lead to recovery & growth

33
Q

AO3 Duck’s model
Not culturally applicable?

A

P - Model is based on r’ships from individualistic cultures, where ending the r’ship is a voluntary choice where separation/divorce is easily attainable
E - This is not the case in some collectivistic cultures where r’ships are arranged by other family members & involve greater family involvement
E - Results in the termination of a r’ship to prove difficult meaning Duck’s model is not applicable to these cultures
L - Duck’s model is therefore culturally biased as it assumes the break-up process in universal

34
Q

AO3 Duck’s model
Ethical issues?

A

P - Significant Ethical issues involved in investigating r’ship breakdown
E - If research involves invasions of privacy or the research is dealing with victims of domestic abuse which involves issues involving protection from harm & confidentiality
E - This therefore makes the topic difficult to investigate due to its sensitivity
L - Therefore research done may have breached ethical guidelines or failed to go into depth due to fears of upsetting participants thus making research into this topic dubious

Relationships Paper 3 (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions