Factors affecting attraction Flashcards

1
Q

What 3 things affect attraction in romantic relationships?

A
  1. Self-disclosure
  2. Physical attractiveness & matching hypothesis
  3. Filter theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is self-disclosure?

A
  • Sharing of personal info to someone we like
  • creates a sense of trust when the info disclosed is ‘secret’
  • crucial element to early stages of a romantic relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is social penetration theory in self-disclosure?

A
  • as a relationship develops, communication moves from relatively shallow, non intimate levels to deeper more personal ones
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain breadth & depth of social disclosure?

what did Altman & Taylor suggest?

A
  • beginning of relationship, info disclosed is low risk & limited in breadth
  • as relationship develops info becomes high risk with breadth
  • disclosure signals an individual likes us & we feel rewarded for this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain reciprocity of self-disclosure from Laurenceau 2005?

A
  • asked pt’s to write daily diary entries about progress in their relationships
  • found self-disclosure & perception of disclosure led to greater intimacy
  • reverse was true: partners who complained about lack of intimacy self-disclosed less
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If self-disclosure occurs to early what could happen?

A
  • either encourages greater intimacy earlier on or the other person is intimidated jeopardising the relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AO3 research support Has & Hartford self disclosure?
(gay couples)

A

P - research support for self-disclosure
E - Has & Hartford found 57% of gay men & women considered open self-disclosure as a main way of maintaining close-relationships
E - demonstrates importance of self-disclosure in romantic relationships, as the theory predicted
L - So adds credibility to self disclosure as a factor affecting romantic r’ships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AO3 correlational research against self disclosure yet good practical applications?

A

P - most support for self-disclosure comes from correlational research
E - whilst there is an undoubted link between self-disclosure & success of r’ships, cause & effect cannot be established decreasing validity
E - However concept has useful practical applications as it can help improve communication leading to greater intimacy
L - shows social-penetration theory can be used to enhance an r’ship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AO3 self-disclosure ignored other factors?

A

P - concept fails to recognise mitigating factors like personality
E - offers support for attraction being predicated on other factors like physical attraction
E - personality is a crucial factor in self disclosure, if a person is open to everyone, their partner may not feel wanted
E - some individuals may not be comfortable with knowing, intimate details of their partner
L - So, shows self-disclosure lacks credibility and may only work person to person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In physical attractiveness what 2 things are looked at?

A
  1. Halo effect
  2. Matching Hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain importance of physical attraction?
(evolutionary perspective)

A
  • evolutionary explanation states attractiveness are indicators of good genetics & health
  • By choosing a partner you are ensuring healthy offspring
  • partner is capable of bearing children (female)
  • provide for the family (male)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline Halo effect?

favourability?
personality?

A
  • people deemed attractive tend to be favoured in society
    e.g. attractive person more likely to be acquitted of a crime & are deemed trustworthy & sociable
  • personality still has to be suitable for us
  • could be argued attractive people make their personalities more attractive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline the matching hypothesis?

A
  • people seek partners of similar attractiveness
  • we should have a realistic judgement of how attractive we are to be able to determine our partners
  • attempting to ‘punch above your weight’ could lead to rejection damaging self-esteem
  • if someone feels their partner is more attractive there is likely to be fears that partner will leave for someone else
  • So we do not go for the most attractive people rather our choice of partner is a compromise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3 research to support physical attractiveness Gunnell & Ceci?
(22% more likely…)
(22 months…..)

A

P - Research support Gunnell & Ceci
E - People who are less physically attractive are 22% more likely to be convicted than hot people & are more likely to get sentenced to 22 months longer
E - suggests physical attractiveness has a big impact on how we perceive people
L - supports concepts of physical attractiveness through the Halo effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

AO3 research support Physical attractiveness
Murtstein 1972 v.s. Walster?
Walster - computer dance experiment

A

P - Murstein 1972
E - asked dating couples to rate themselves in terms of physical attractiveness & asked judges to rate them
E - found real pairs were similar in terms of physical attractiveness v.s. random pairs
P - whereas Walster (computer dance experiment) did not find support for matching hypothesis
E - nearly 400 male & female students were randomly paired at a dance, & were later asked to rate their date
E - Physical attractiveness proved to be the most important factor in liking over general compatibility, it was the best predictor of the likelihood they would see each other again/not
L - Shows support for physical attractiveness but not matching hypothesis in generally liking someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AO3 Physical attractiveness
Towhey 1979 against?
(photos & biography)

A

P - Issues with physical attraction & matching hypothesis
E - Towhey 1979 gave pt’s photos of strangers & some biographical info: pt’s were asked to rate how much they liked the people
E - Towhey found physical attractiveness was more important for participants who were sexist
L - concept of physical attractiveness & matching hypothesis is sexist

17
Q

AO3 Physical attraction
Counterpoint to Towhey 1979 about evolutionary explanations for sexual attraction?

A

P - Towhey argued the mathching hypothesis & physical attractiveness however fails to appreciate an evolutionary perspective
E - For males intra-sexual selection is argued to be innate & therefore sexual attraction comes from physical attractiveness such as Hip-waist-ratio
E - Shows physical attractiveness being more important for some pt’s may be innate and not driven by sexism
L - weakens the validity of Towhey’s research and thus lacks credibility

18
Q

What is the filter theory & who came up with it?

what are the 3 filters in brief based on?

A
  • Kerchkoff & Davies (1962)
  • our choices of mates are limited by several factors which ‘filter’ down potential mates available to us
  1. proximity/demographics
  2. similarity in attitudes
  3. internal factors/complementarity
19
Q

what is the 1st filter?

A
  • social demography:
  • individuals with similar demographics to us
  • where we work/live (proximity)
  • religious/not
  • education/economic background
20
Q

what is the 2nd filter?

A
  • similarity in attitudes:
  • more likely to meet people with similar attitudes & beliefs to you
  • most important phase in forming an r’ship
  • partners must agree on the basics to encourage deeper intimacy & communication
21
Q

What is the 3rd filter

A
  • Complementarity:
  • how much does the partner satisfy their partner’s needs emotionally & sexually
  • does the partner have traits the other makes up for
  • important for leaving the initial stages & committing yourself
22
Q

AO3 filter theory
Festinger?
(stairwells)

A

P - empirical support for filter theoryby Festinger
E - found people who lived nearer the stairwells in apartments blocks knew most people in the block
E - suggests familiarity is important in r’ships & supports the filter theory, that social demographics (1st filter) play a role in romantic r’ships
L - supports filter theory

23
Q

AO3 filter theory
Deterministic?

A

P - Filter theory’s emphasis on societal factors seems deterministic
E - Suggests we have little control over potential mates & the filtering of individuals outside of our location & social group occurs before we begin to look for partners
E - could be argued to be a negative factor because it implies we are not in full control of our r’ship behaviour & ignores self-disclosure
L - implies without acknowledging role of free will in r/ships, filter theory is quite pessimistic

24
Q

AO3 filter theory
High level of face validity but emergence of dating apps?

A

P - High levels of face validity as sociodemographic factors, attitudes & complementarity is something people experience in everyday life
E - people can interact with filter theory because they easily understand it
E - However sociodemographic (filter 1) may not play a big role in modern times due to emergence of dating apps vs 2-3 decades ago as people are likely to meet others from different locations
L - Filter theory less valid