Theories of learning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Habituation

A

Getting used to a particular stimuli and getting desantitised to it( not responding)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Classical conditioning

A

Learning = associations
Natural occuring stimuli and unconditioned response vs. conitioned stimuli to an unconditioned stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Instrumental conditioning

A

Edward Thorndike - response depends on the reinforced behaviour

BF Skinner insisted actions are voluntary, operant - certain action brings certain consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Law of effect

A

Responses that are rewarded are strenghtened and the ones that are punished are weakened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acquisition of conditioned response CR

A

CR to a CS , CS leads + CS (secondary conditioned stimulus) = CR, blank + CS= CR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Extinction in learning

A

We develop associations connected to a stimulus and producing a reaction, but over time if the item to which we associated changes the response declines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Spontanious recovery & Reconditioning

A

After a break we try again and the original associated item is present some residial learning has left so the response reappears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Generalisation

A

Seeing similar objects to the original association but the conditioned response is still present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Discrimination

A

Over time we realise we won’t get what we want from the original association and earlier weve generalised to the original item.
Later we learn to discriminate between one and another association
Ihibitor - learning our original association is no longer valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Conditioned fear

A

CR is much more complex than just salivating (pavlov’s experiments) , conditioned emotional response procedure
- fear response is sometimes biological
- wolf initially ignores footsteps of danger while approaching food shack, continues to salivate
- later supresses salivation

KJ, 26 YO - CR to doing heroin at home so body reacted differently when in an unfamliar enviornment - overdose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conditioned fear

A

past negative experience leading to us quickly learn a negative association with something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

CR and UR connection

A

CR and UR are very similar however salive samples show different enzymes
UR - intense salivation, richer in enzymes (meat in mouth)
UR - fear conditioning - exposed to negative stimuli, heart rate increases (wolf exposer to teaser)
CR - footsteps wolf hears - wolf freezes, tenses muscles, heart rate slows = fearful anticipation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

We can adapt to conditioned responses

A

For example in diabetes, when people take insuline over and over again they can see changes in insulkine levels just by seeing the needle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Edward Tolman’s maze experiment

A

Cognitive learning- goal oriented or learn about the conditioned stimulus
In Classical conditioning animals don’t respond the same way to CS as US
They’re subtly or very different sometimes
CS signals that US is to follow - animal makes preparations
Signal needs to occur within close timeframe in classical conditioning so as to learn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contiguity (Pavlov)

A

Short period of time between CS and US for learning to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contingency

A

For learning to take place a stimulus must provide a signal of a likelihood of something happening
Reliably has to occur prior to event

17
Q

Contingency effect

A

Rescorla 1967,1988
Rats exposed to tone (CS) and shock (US)
Tone not always presented prior to shock
in 2 groups of rats tone indicated 40% chance of shock (CS-US pairing)

18
Q

The Blocking Effect - Leon Kamin, 1968

A

refers to the fact we larn less if a second stimulus which was previously reliable is now unreliable or inconsistent with our initial association

19
Q

Latent learning ( Tolman & Honzik, 1930)

A

Acquisition of new knowledge without change in behaviour

20
Q

Best studying/ learning techniques

A

Techniques that have evidence based research suggesting they work

21
Q

Elaborative interogation

A

Explaining why a specific fact is true

22
Q

Self explanation

A

Explain steps taken for problem solving, cxpl, how new info is incorporated with old info

23
Q

Keyword mnemonic

A

Using keywords and mental images to associate with verbal materials

24
Q

Interleaved practice

A

Schedule of study of different topics, materials within a single study session

25
Q

Presley et al1987

A

Self explanation works because it helps to incorporate new information to prior knowledge (students must be able to discriminate among related facts)

In this experiment Ps were asked to soon after revising, therefore not sufficient method for longer texts

26
Q

Highlighting and underlining

A

Most frequently used method

Fowler & Barker (1974) - Ps read an article, 1 hour of study, 1 week later 54 MCQs (allowed to review material 10 mins prior to test)
Highlighting groups didn’t outperform control groups

Draws attention to important information if highlighting has been used appropriately and distictively
Enhances understanding
Active engagement should benefit performance

27
Q

Practice testing

A

Low stakes or no stakes practice (eg. Practical recall, practice problem solving or questions)

28
Q

Retrieval practice

A

Practice test - MCQs, fill in blank tests, essay style recall tests
Added benefit to long-term retention

29
Q

Roediger & Karpicke (2006)

A

Passage read 4 tmes, no test - single test: passage read 3 times, students recall as much as poss, repeated test - read once then recall as much as poss on 3 occassions

Average recall waas 50% higher in the repeated test condition - ROBUST EFFECT

30
Q

Why is practice testing good for learning?

A

Mediated effect - better learning at next study
Carpenter (2009) testing improves retantion by triggering elaboratibe retrieval process (multiple pathways to facilitate access)

31
Q

Cramming vs. distributed practice

A

Distributed practice works better according to Bude et al. 2011
Capeda (2006) found 47% of students recall better after spaced study - robust effect

32
Q

Why is distributed practice good?

A

Deficient processing - not much effort to reread ntes or retrieve straight away, students can think they know more then they do
Reminding- what’s to be le-learned
Consolidation - second learning episode benefts from first learning episode

The longer the space between the learning episodes the longer the retenton?!

To remember something for a week episodes should be 12-24 hrs apart