Memory 2 - Process Models Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Visible persistance (vs. Iconic memory - visual memory, fast decay)

A

Visible persistance is when a visual stimulus appears before the eye for some time after it’s been presented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Working Memory (vs. Short-Term Store)

A

STS = controlling, “executive” system which is active and working memory as opposed to a passive store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dual Task paradigms - Baddeley & Hitch

A

Peform a primary task whilst simultaniosuly performing a secondary task which prsumably take up STS capacity (called “concurent memory load”)

Overt(qvna repeticiq) rehearsal for secondary task ensures non-switching between tasks

-Q: Does STS divide to deal with both tasks? - A: It’s possible to carry out both task which require STS
- Error rate held constant
-Increase in reasoning time is significant but not large (35%) = speed-accuracy trade-off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Working Memory Model

A

Visuo-spatial Sketch Pad (inner eye) - Central Executive - (Articulatory loop or phonologcal loop = inner voice) - Phonological Store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evidence for Phonological loop

A
  • Dual task results
  • Phonological confusability effect (Conrad 1964; Baddeley 1966)
  • Word- Length Effect (Baddeley, 1975)

Speech-based phonological system with 2 components:

  • Phonological Store = stores for a few secs before fading
  • Articulatory (Phonological) Loop = rehearsal process results in subvocal (inner) speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Word- Length effect

A

Greater span for short words than for long words, whther written or heard
It also corresponds with speed at which words are read

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Articularly Supression

A

Method used to inhibit inner rehearsal of items in a memory test or experiment by requiring the Ps to perform a distracting verbal task (such as counting or naming during retention period)

Results: word-length effect dissapears (for written words only!)

Explanation: Articulation of irrelevent items dominates the Articulatory Control Processes, so words cannot be rehearsed- word length has no influence
Spoken words go straight to phonological store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What’s the phonological loop for?

A
  1. Learning to read - lower memory spans-reduced reading ability
  2. Vocabulary acquisition - correlation between non-word repetition ability and vocabulary size
  3. Language comprehension - patients with STS impairments have difficulty comprehending complex sentances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Visuospatial Sketch-pad

A

A segment of memory where an image can be stored and manipuated to influence behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Brooks Matrix Task (1967)

A

Learn sequence of sentances to remember:
-Spatial (left/right, beneath/above) better with verbal instructions
-Non spatial (quick/slow, good/bad) perf. better with written instructions
Result: recall 8 spatial vs 6 non spatia - benefit of spatial imagery
Visual and spatial interfere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What’s the sketch pad for?

A

Not as well studied
Geographical location - how to navigate our way in the enviornment
Planning and performing spatial tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Central Executive

A

Most complex and least understood component of Working memory
- divided by storage and processing demands
- model suggests CE co-ordinates the activity of two slave systems?!
- Functons more like an attentional system than memory store
-Coordinating retrieval strategies and selective attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evidence for existance of Working Memory

A
  • Partial report technique
  • Brown-Peterson Paradigm
  • Digit span
    -Phonological Confusability
    -Semantic COnfusability
  • Serial Position Curve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is it a Sensory Store or Processing mechanism?

A

Visual icon is a memory store that decays rapidly (<500 miliseconds)
-Sperling’s (1960) Partial Report Technique
- Eriksen & Collins (1967) :Dot- pattern fusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Eriksen & Collins (1967) dot pattern fusion

A

Dot patterns shown with a big and small time gap, the smaller the gap the more fusable the pattern
ISI - inter-stimulus interval (in msecs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is persistese of visual information a phenomenon of visual processing?

A

Yes and not sensory memory store

Proof?

17
Q

Hogben & Di Lollo (1974), Di Lollo (1977,1980)

A

Di Lollo argued it’s not sensory store but a sensory processing
-Begins from onset of S1 and runs its course
-As ISI increases decline in performace increases because effecive overlap decreases

18
Q

Coltheart (1980) Three separate phenomena

A

-Neural persistence (overlap in neural processing; very brief)
- Visible persistence (overlap in visual processing; Di Lollo <200)
- Informational persistence (memory that decays; Sperling 150-300 msec)

19
Q

Haber (1983) my GUY

A

Criticised heavily the ecological validity of the study of iconic (sesnory) memory - stating it didn’t matter if it’s processing or memory because the tasks were useless and non-applicable to daily life (like readiing in a thunder storm)

20
Q

The Levels of Processing framework

A

3 types of processing: orthographic, phonological and semantic - deeper at semantic level more superficial at orthographic level same with retention

-Incidental learning paradigms support the idea that encoding can occur without rehearsal

21
Q

Elaboration effect

A

High elaboration leads to better retention
Elaborate processing increases the number of associations between stimulus and context

22
Q

Elaborative effect ( Craik & Tulving, 1975)

A

Elaborate process creates more associations between stimuli and context

23
Q

Problems with LOP

A

Circularity of the definition ‘depth’
In order to break circularity and independent measure of depth is required

24
Q

Lockhart & Craik (1990) responded

A

qualitatively different domains of processing; eg. semantic vs phonemic can be defined in absence of effect on memory performance

25
Q

Other criticism of LOP

A

Morris, Brandsford & Franks (1977)- LOP effect for recgnition test, but opposite for rhyming test, therefore deep processing doesn’t alwats enhance memory

26
Q

Transfer Appropriate Processing - Morris, Bransford & Franks (1977)

A

Memory performance depends on the extent to which processes used at the time of learning are the same as those used when memory tested