Theories of Development Flashcards
What big metanarrative is modernisation theory influenced by?
FUNCTIONALISM
When did Modernisation theory come about?
- Cold War period - early 1960s
* 1947 Marshall Plan an active example of Modernisation Theory (lift the rest of the world out of poverty)
What does Modernisation theory argue?
- The theory explains how poorer countries could achieve development through economic growth & how Communism could not be the way to achieve development (CONTEXT - Cold War)
- ROSTOW subtitled his most popular work ‘an anti-communist manifesto’, describing communism as a disease that can stop modernisation.
What criticisms does modernisation theory face?
- It’s essentially an ethnocentric approach (only route to development is following the footsteps of the West)
- Sucess is based on mass consumption (like the US)
Explain Parson’s ‘evolutionary principles’
- For Parsons, the biggest difference = trad societies are more based on ascribed status & modern societies were individualistic/based on achieved status
- Parsons argues that society passes through evolutionary stages, marked by ‘evolutionary universals’ e.g the decline of trad kinship patterns (extended family –> nuclear family) and the emergence of stratification
How is Parson’s criticised?
- the difference in societies Parson’s draws on are questionable
- some of the supposed characteristics of trad society survive even in the most developed societies & some supposed characteristics of modern society can be found in less developed societies
What prevents development?
according to modernisation theorists
Obstacles to development are internal…
- having trad values/attitudes
- a lack of necessary modern values (differed gratification/the need for achievement)
- a lack of necessary institutions/organisations for economic growth (banks, lacking capital)
What is a major difference within modernisation theory?
Some key thinkers (Rostow) emphasise economic modernisation whereas, other key thinkers (Hoselitz) emphasise social obstacles
What are the five stages of Rostow’s staircase model?
- Traditional Society (subsistence, values limiting society)
- Pre-Conditions for Take Off (Western values take hold)
- Take Off (Industrial rev. and cultural change)
- Drive to Maturity (new ideas/improved tech, growth)
- High Mass Consumption (welfare system, disposable $)
What did Hoselitz argue?
- applied a functionalist model of change to developing countries
- argued they needed to modernise socially & culturally & economically
- Obstacles are social systems that limit social mobility & force people to accept new patterns of work
- main assets of modern society = educational opportunity, individual freedom & the rule of law
- argued that cities could act as centres of Western values & spread them to encourage modernisation
Explain modernisation theory today
- tends to be dismissed as irrelevant today
- laid foundations that prove durable (communism failed and capitalism achieving economic growth)
- rich countries continue to use development aid to help poorer countries to develop
- Rostow saw India & Chine as at the ‘take off’ stage (1950s), today they are nearly at ‘drive to maturity’ - an estimate of 60 yrs between these stages is accurate.
What metanarrative influences Dependency Theory?
NEO-MARXISM
When did DT emerge?
- 1970s - a response to modernisation theory
* Radical theories were strong in West & Third world due to activism sparked by the Vietnam War
According to DTs, what prevents development?
- obstacles to development are external
- developing countries have been forced into subordination (colonialism & neo-colonialism)
- claim political independence is not enough to escape dependency - they need to break away from the global capitalism
What is neo-colonialism?
The continuation of past economic dominance by former colonial powers over ex-colonies
What are the key points of DT?
- Rejects Modernisation Theory (external, not internal)
- Anti-Capitalist (global capitalism is a world exploitative system)
- The global situation today is seen as a DIRECT RESULT of historical capitalism, world trade & colonialism
- Developed capitalist countries benefit from cheap access to raw materials & markets for manufactured goods
- The theory emphasises third world countries nationalism & national unity & self-reliance NOT aid from West for development
How is underdevelopment seen by DT?
- Developed countries have made the poorer countries poor & it’s in their interest to keep them poor (Chang, 2003, ‘Kicking the ladder away’)
- Happens through a chain of relationships between the METROPOLIS & the SATELLITE states
- Chain of dependency = the development of the Metropole causes underdevelopment of the satellite
- the Metropole ‘buys off’ the comprador bourgeoisie allowing exploitation of people in poor countries & preventing change that would benefit the majority
Define the term ‘Comprador Bourgeoisie’
the groups of elites/leaders in poor countries
the people modernisation theorist would expect to lead development
What does Frank argue?
- Rich Western countries were never dominated & exploited, poor Eastern countries were and therefore are underdeveloped - so cannot follow the footsteps of the West
- DTs argue that non-Western societies were often wealthy & economically complex when the West first met them (e.g Ming Dynasty, China)
What are the three stages of development according to DTs?
STAGE 1: Mercantile Capitalism
(merchants travelling the world to collect goods to trade in Europe)
STAGE 2: Colonialism
(direct political control over countries)
STAGE 3: Neo-Colonialism
(economic control over ex-colonies keeping them dependent)
Why are developing countries in a different position to rich countries when they were developing, according to DTs?
- They’re locked into a one-sided relationship e.g exporting cash crops
- They have inherited inappropriate political, educational and healthcare systems from colonisers
In which way does neo-colonialism work to prevent development today?
- tried aid & aid with conditions attached
- Political alliances through which the developed dominate the developing
- TNCs
- Terms of trade
- Global Finance (IMF, World Bank) & Debt
How can underdeveloped countries develop?
According to DTs
DTs see underdevelopment as permanent & the only way out is to escape the capitalist system and the ‘master-servant’ relationship:
- Development needs to be state-led (external powers are the oppressors)
- Isolation - an attempt to be self-reliant and have little contact with the rest of the world (e.g China)
- Breaking away at a time when the colonial powers are weak (during war or recession)
- ‘associate development’ - some ‘limited’ development could occur when locked into capitalism but this has bad consequences